Last month, I made a post where I described neural networks as "bad".
Uncategorized
35
Posts
32
Posters
0
Views
-
alkdsfjldafljgglkgjlf
@mcc <incoherent gibberish>
-
Last month, I made a post where I described neural networks as "bad". This resulted in many emotionally charged responses, from people bothered I do not like a type of math that some of you like. Well, guess what! I don't like category theory either!! Yeah! I said it! I think it's a poorly constructed formalism! I think its attempts to make a clean break with all previous mathematical terminology obscure more than they reveal!!
@mcc these greetings go out to everyone who knows me and i'm wishing for "the look" by roxette!
-
alkdsfjldafljgglkgjlf
-
alkdsfjldafljgglkgjlf
Do let us know how the test turns out!
-
alkdsfjldafljgglkgjlf
-
@mcc This reply is not interesting.
-
alkdsfjldafljgglkgjlf
@mcc why study category theory when you could study cat eatery theatre
https://meow.camera -
alkdsfjldafljgglkgjlf
@mcc irieitalisvital
-
Last month, I made a post where I described neural networks as "bad". This resulted in many emotionally charged responses, from people bothered I do not like a type of math that some of you like. Well, guess what! I don't like category theory either!! Yeah! I said it! I think it's a poorly constructed formalism! I think its attempts to make a clean break with all previous mathematical terminology obscure more than they reveal!!
@mcc just answered to the post below. adding this in case it might help for the test to be successuseful
-
alkdsfjldafljgglkgjlf
@mcc Everyone knows two wrongs make a right so you should take up neural category net theory.
-
alkdsfjldafljgglkgjlf
@mcc im fuckin mclosin it
-
alkdsfjldafljgglkgjlf
-
alkdsfjldafljgglkgjlf
@mcc that’s a lot of pressure to be interesting
-
alkdsfjldafljgglkgjlf
@mcc How could you ignore me?!?!
-
@mcc that’s a lot of pressure to be interesting
@glyph replying to the muted conversation post, minus mcc from mention here.
-
alkdsfjldafljgglkgjlf
@mcc to quote wiggles the dog,
(I got really shook by IIRC epimorphisms in the category of groups)
-
alkdsfjldafljgglkgjlf
@mcc is this a thread for secrets then?
-
alkdsfjldafljgglkgjlf
@mcc sdlkfjsdlkfjslk;fajsd;fasdjkl
-
alkdsfjldafljgglkgjlf
@mcc Replied to the key smash.
-
alkdsfjldafljgglkgjlf
@mcc does alkdsfjldafljgglkgjlf mean anything?
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
Alone Season 5 watch thread. Spoilers ahead.
Mongolia!?
-
my house smells like bread
-
@Jeffool I keep thinking of games to make for myself to help me learn stuff I want to learn, so maybe.
-
I wonder if there's a market for adult-aimed learning games.
-
@hipsterelectron this is true
-
@hipsterelectron i wouldn't call it impulsive so much as "occasionally prone to fits of passion"
-
Non è la rete tutta ad essere "tossica", così come non sono le persone comuni ad essere necessariamente "una massa di ignoranti" (qui mi viene da criticare Eco). Queste idee portano a volte a implicazioni pericolose, come quella che la democrazia sarebbe nei fatti impossibile ("basta guardare cosa succede su Facebook, Instagram e TikTok", dicono). Pensiamo invece a che differenza passi tra TikTok e Wikipedia, e riflettiamo su quello.
-
https://www.internazionale.it/magazine/flurin-claluna/2026/01/22/che-succede-con-wikipedia
Bell'articolo. Il successo di Wikipedia, (così come quello di GNU/Linux fin dai tempi di Raymond, Torvalds e Stallman) dimostra come la gente comune quando si mette insieme, anche in modo apparentemente disorganizzato, può creare GRANDI COSE. Dimostra inoltre che tossicità e ignoranza dominanti in certi contesti non dipendono dall'intrinseca incapacità dell'uomo di dominare i propri più bassi istinti, ma da come certe altre piattaforme vengono COSCIENTEMENTE progettate.
