u programmed this with claude?

[stumpythemutt@social.linux.pizza]

@s0 @jacqueline It's the very nature of any "AI" discussion. Somebody makes a clear, concise criticism of the technology and then the apologists and "I wrote my dissertation with chat gippity" simps pile on.

[herrold@dice.camp]

@unionwhore @aparrish it was unintentional. I apologize.

I didn't see any preferred pronuns on their profile.

[unionwhore@ni.hil.ist]

@herrold @aparrish maybe it's a federation issue. If that happens you can usually few the profile by opening it in a browser.

[ruff@social.librem.one]

@j3rn @jacqueline oh ok, that's totally changing everything. So let's blame the computer, yea, show him. make computer dumb again!

[allanb@mastodon.social]

@davidgerard @jacqueline reference?

[allanb@mastodon.social]

@davidgerard @jacqueline

It's not exactly open information, but Claude probably was involved in sorting out data in conjunction with Palantir's Maven, which presents targets for review. Apparently it is used to speed-up Maven's work. Human review is supposed to happen afterwards.

Claude has a kind of "constitutional governance" built-in, which is different from some of the other AIs.

There is a stripped-down version for DoD.

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/iran-school-attack-ai-investigation-b2937456.html

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.1.0_5.pdf