u programmed this with claude?

[ojrask@piipitin.fi]

@vyllenjamnin @jacqueline

You're probably paying for the tool, or at least contributing to the so-called valuation of the company providing it, hence providing the company with resources to provide child killing services elsewhere.

[kinosian@mastodon.sdf.org]

@ottumm @jacqueline Sorry to hear that, but thank you for letting me know!

[andre123@snowfan.it]

@vyllenjamnin while I get your point, I think AIs (and of course people/companies behind them) are not as simple a tool as a pen. So I tend not to agree with your analogy in this case.

@jacqueline

[s0@cathode.church]

@jacqueline that sure got some rancid replies

[gsuberland@chaos.social]

@s0 @jacqueline endless blockfodder

[davidgerard@circumstances.run]

@allanb @jacqueline turns out it was literally Claude for target selection

[liquor_american@universeodon.com]

@vyllenjamnin @jacqueline Bad analogy. A pen isn't pushing anyone to do war crimes.

[unionwhore@ni.hil.ist]

@herrold @aparrish Heyy even if I agree with her behaving douchy, please don't call her a guy if her pronouns imply otherwise and as far as I've seen (which is just skimming over her profile) she never indicated being comfortable with being called a guy.

[j3rn@fosstodon.org]

@ruff I'm going to take a wild guess here and say that @jacqueline did not vote for Trump.

[gudenau@hachyderm.io]

@jacqueline You know, they frame stuff this poorly so I'll do it too.

As a treat.

[stumpythemutt@social.linux.pizza]

@s0 @jacqueline It's the very nature of any "AI" discussion. Somebody makes a clear, concise criticism of the technology and then the apologists and "I wrote my dissertation with chat gippity" simps pile on.

[herrold@dice.camp]

@unionwhore @aparrish it was unintentional. I apologize.

I didn't see any preferred pronuns on their profile.

[unionwhore@ni.hil.ist]

@herrold @aparrish maybe it's a federation issue. If that happens you can usually few the profile by opening it in a browser.

[ruff@social.librem.one]

@j3rn @jacqueline oh ok, that's totally changing everything. So let's blame the computer, yea, show him. make computer dumb again!

[allanb@mastodon.social]

@davidgerard @jacqueline reference?

[allanb@mastodon.social]

@davidgerard @jacqueline

It's not exactly open information, but Claude probably was involved in sorting out data in conjunction with Palantir's Maven, which presents targets for review. Apparently it is used to speed-up Maven's work. Human review is supposed to happen afterwards.

Claude has a kind of "constitutional governance" built-in, which is different from some of the other AIs.

There is a stripped-down version for DoD.

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/iran-school-attack-ai-investigation-b2937456.html

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.465515/gov.uscourts.cand.465515.1.0_5.pdf