@elena I’m not a lawyer.
Uncategorized
6
Posts
3
Posters
1
Views
-
@elena
I’m not a lawyer. You don’t seem like the “play it safe” type. That said, there would be a way to reframe your opening paragraph more in terms of your curiosity over how the developers intend to follow through on their selling points, given the issues you’ve identified. You could come across as striving to be helpful to them, rather than being bent on puncturing their hype balloon. -
@elena
I’m not a lawyer. You don’t seem like the “play it safe” type. That said, there would be a way to reframe your opening paragraph more in terms of your curiosity over how the developers intend to follow through on their selling points, given the issues you’ve identified. You could come across as striving to be helpful to them, rather than being bent on puncturing their hype balloon.@Poindex76 very very good point and I’ve already re-written the opening to “soften” it. Thanks
-
@Poindex76 very very good point and I’ve already re-written the opening to “soften” it. Thanks
@elena @Poindex76 maybe you can add a disclaimer?
e.g.
Disclaimer:
This article reflects my personal opinions and interpretations based on publicly available information and my own independent research. All views expressed are my own and should not be taken as statements of fact beyond what is explicitly sourced.or
Disclaimer:
This article represents my personal opinions, commentary, and conclusions formed through independent research using publicly available sources. Any characterizations, interpretations, or inferences are presented as opinion, not as statements of objective fact. Readers are encouraged to review the referenced materials and draw their own conclusions. -
@elena @Poindex76 maybe you can add a disclaimer?
e.g.
Disclaimer:
This article reflects my personal opinions and interpretations based on publicly available information and my own independent research. All views expressed are my own and should not be taken as statements of fact beyond what is explicitly sourced.or
Disclaimer:
This article represents my personal opinions, commentary, and conclusions formed through independent research using publicly available sources. Any characterizations, interpretations, or inferences are presented as opinion, not as statements of objective fact. Readers are encouraged to review the referenced materials and draw their own conclusions.@mapache this is amazing, thank you Maho 🙏 @Poindex76
-
@mapache this is amazing, thank you Maho 🙏 @Poindex76
@elena @Poindex76 some extra reccomendations a friend sent me:
Attribute aggressively (“according to…”, “appears to…”, “based on…”)
Separate facts from conclusions (facts first, opinion after)
Avoid stating intent as fact (“intended to”, “designed to”), frame it as inference
Link sources whenever possible -
@elena @Poindex76 some extra reccomendations a friend sent me:
Attribute aggressively (“according to…”, “appears to…”, “based on…”)
Separate facts from conclusions (facts first, opinion after)
Avoid stating intent as fact (“intended to”, “designed to”), frame it as inference
Link sources whenever possible@mapache thank you for the brilliant tips Maho 🙏 @Poindex76
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@Ashedryden Oh, yeah!
-
-
-
@rolery cara Rolery, un film che invito tutti e tutte a vedere
-
But it's not meant to work that way, such a structure should not be a dynamic rigid body. In the final game you'll be able to choose if you want your design to be dynamic (like a vehicle) or static (for a building, a bridge, etc.) Either way you'll be able to add the same parts, be it to make an articulated vehicle or a hangar door, water lock, or anything you can imagine (hopefully).
-
On the technical side, the system is quite simple. The beam part is a small #Godot scene consisting of a rigid body with a box collider and box mesh (placeholder graphics). You can then instantiate this small scene at will.
To attach two parts together, I don't use joints (would be bad for performances and physics engine stability). Instead, I merge the rigid bodies, and add all the colliders as child nodes (and also update the total mass). So, the final bridge is a single rigid body.
-
A bit of stress testing the system, and already found #EmergentGameplay out of a single non-resizable dumb rectangular part 😉
Here is how you can build a bridge, even though you don't have the right parts, and also that you can't (yet) lift or otherwise move your contraption, and deleting parts is not implemented either.
Which means you have to find creative ways to tilt the orientation of the thing during construction and be careful about the weight balance.
-
@Ashedryden@xoxo.zone @evan@cosocial.ca I was fully expecting a list of "Killing in the Name"-type songs, but this is so much funnier
