Military action against a sovereign state is illegal under the UN charter.
Uncategorized
8
Posts
5
Posters
1
Views
-
Military action against a sovereign state is illegal under the UN charter. There are two exceptions: self-defense, and UN Security Council approval.
Heads of state have personal immunity while in office from prosecution in foreign courts.
This attack is a serious breakdown of international norms.
UPDATE: edgelord replies not welcome, thanks.
-
Military action against a sovereign state is illegal under the UN charter. There are two exceptions: self-defense, and UN Security Council approval.
Heads of state have personal immunity while in office from prosecution in foreign courts.
This attack is a serious breakdown of international norms.
UPDATE: edgelord replies not welcome, thanks.
@evan uhm … like he cares?
-
Military action against a sovereign state is illegal under the UN charter. There are two exceptions: self-defense, and UN Security Council approval.
Heads of state have personal immunity while in office from prosecution in foreign courts.
This attack is a serious breakdown of international norms.
UPDATE: edgelord replies not welcome, thanks.
@evan <Manuel Noriega has entered the chat>
-
@evan uhm … like he cares?
This post is deleted! -
Military action against a sovereign state is illegal under the UN charter. There are two exceptions: self-defense, and UN Security Council approval.
Heads of state have personal immunity while in office from prosecution in foreign courts.
This attack is a serious breakdown of international norms.
UPDATE: edgelord replies not welcome, thanks.
@evan this tracks with how the US has done things for a very long time, especially in the western hemisphere. Things like international law are cosplay. This is just regime change for oil, colonialism and plunder
-
Military action against a sovereign state is illegal under the UN charter. There are two exceptions: self-defense, and UN Security Council approval.
Heads of state have personal immunity while in office from prosecution in foreign courts.
This attack is a serious breakdown of international norms.
UPDATE: edgelord replies not welcome, thanks.
@evan americans are way too lazy and comfortable to do anything but netflix and chill as democracy is so gratuitously removed from them
-
@evan this tracks with how the US has done things for a very long time, especially in the western hemisphere. Things like international law are cosplay. This is just regime change for oil, colonialism and plunder
@kworker No, it doesn't. The US used invaded and occupied Latin American countries in the first half of the 1900s, but after the formation of the United Nations it was more involved in funding and supporting civil wars. Exceptions like the invasion of Panama have been criticized in the world community, and the mining of Nicaragua's harbours was a crime per the International Court of Justice. That kind of normalization is extremely dangerous.
-
@evan americans are way too lazy and comfortable to do anything but netflix and chill as democracy is so gratuitously removed from them
@brotherpsyche international law doesn't require anything from Americans.
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
Vergogniosa mistificazzione daa realtà sur folle attacco a no stato sovrano. Na guera insensata contro gli interessi nazzionali ha stata voluta dar solito circo con la scusa senpre bona daa difesa dei diritti carpestati dar dittatore di turno
Me riferisco a l'attacco a Gheddafi in Libbia. La cosa de Maduro in Venezzuela invecie è perfetta come ogni cosa che fa Donard! 😻
-
@Otttoz ma io je la davo pure, l'Itaglia, e che nun la vuole 😢
-
@NullTheFool the whole reason for its existence was to prevent liberals from discovering life outside of corporate social silos
-
@ariadne jellyfin media import sure takes a long time everywhere.
-
#anno2026 0601 #Pensiero #mattutino
Toh! Nevica... 🌨️❄️☃️
-
-
could yoiu please hold it closer to your screen so I can hear it better?
-
Behold! A game.
