Launch: New Blocking Features on Bridgy Fed.
General Discussion
1
Posts
1
Posters
13
Views
-
Launch: New Blocking Features on Bridgy Fed. #activityPub #ATproto
Posted into THE FEDIVERSE VS. CORPORATE SOCIAL MEDIA @the-fediverse-vs-corporate-social-media-mobileatom
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@julian Just not with lemmy/piefed, if you are not able to follow an individual (WP-blog in this case) residing out of the walled fedi garden.
Not sure about mbin. Couldn't test that yet, as I am still waiting for my registration... :/
-
@mikka@mstdn.social that's correct, this is how all software running AP works.
-
@julian @pfefferle Yes, but only if you have at least one follower on the targeted flavor of fedi.
-
@mikka@mstdn.social @pfefferle@mastodon.social the answer is yes.
WP federates out as a group actor which threadiverse software understands.
-
@silverpill@mitra.social it seems like a fair starting point to establish some common formats. There's clearly a lot of work still to be done.
There are some choices that seem questionable to me; the document seems to imply that KeyPackages as an attribute of the Actor objects can be retrieved without much control. I think that's problematic. They're only usable one time and they could easily be exhausted if distribution isn't controlled (they have to be replenished by the client and the client has to maintain all active packages in its key store).
I gate access behind a verified signature and record who is given which package at the server to establish some limits.
-
@pfefferle @liaizon @julian @notiz.blog Actually I wanted to know if it is possible to follow *from* lemmy/piefed > someone elsewhere. Because this is a necessitiy to federate anything from a WP-installation running activitypub (plugin) to fediverse.
-
@mikka @liaizon @julian you can follow a blog on lemmy (see @notiz.blog ) and following others using WordPress is an early beta and I have not tested to follow communites/groups, but we definitely plan to support that.
