A step toward the #ActivityPub threaded view we deserve ?
General Discussion
4
Posts
2
Posters
21
Views
-
A step toward the #ActivityPub threaded view we deserve ?
https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/@mms/115453453780836386
POC by @mms
-
A step toward the #ActivityPub threaded view we deserve ?
https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/@mms/115453453780836386
POC by @mms
strk@floss.social threaded views exist in many ActivityPub software already, including Lemmy, Piefed, mbin, and NodeBB (though that last one is a linear view.)
-
@julian any of them running on Android ?
-
@julian any of them running on Android ?
strk@floss.social NodeBB is installable via PWA. I'm using it as an app on my phone right now via Chrome. Push notifications included.
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
Emd to end => Client side encryption. And only you will hold the private keys.
Messages travel via ActivityPub inboxes, but are opaque to the servers.
-
@bonfire @swf @sovtechfund @benpate is it client or server side?
-
@acb @bonfire @swf @sovtechfund
This *specific* tech will make private groups, similar to Apple Messages, Signal, and WhatsApp.
It won’t make “Friends Only” posts, but.. both Emissary and Bonfire already provide different flavors of “Circles” that let you choose the visibility of your posts. https://emissary.dev/circles
Id live for other Fediverse tools like Mastodon to add this too.
-
@bonfire @swf @sovtechfund @benpate Will this mean the possibility of friends-only (i.e. people you select, rather than anyone who follows you) posts on Mastodon/Pixelfed/similar? If ActivityPub ever gets mass adoption, that will be important, because when everyone’s here, so are griefers, trolls, pig-butchers and as yet uncategorised hostile actors.
-
@soatok @ligasser @bonfire let's start a thread to make sure we are clear amongst ourselves! We all really want to see collaborative and interoperable solutions, especially when so much expert thought has gone into them
-
@alisynthesis The initial idea is that all fediverse apps (clients and servers) should implement the standard for maximum interoperability. But it's definitely worth thinking about what we could do to make that possible in any case!
-
@bonfire is it feasible that someone could build a chat client that would let any Fediverse account privately talk with any other Fediverse account?
Because that would be insanely cool.
-
@ligasser @bonfire Not sure, but:
Specification: https://github.com/fedi-e2ee/public-key-directory-specificationImplementation: https://github.com/fedi-e2ee/pkd-server-phpAnnouncement: https://soatok.blog/2025/12/15/announcing-key-transparency-fediverse/The AuxData thing should also be useful for folks that want to build atop my feature to add transparency to other types of public keys (or any other public commitments of static data, such as security researchers publishing hashes of vulnerabilities being disclosed).
