you don't need 4k and you certainly dont need 8k.
Uncategorized
6
Posts
6
Posters
4
Views
-
you don't need 4k and you certainly dont need 8k. if you tell me you can tell the difference i will simply not believe you
-
you don't need 4k and you certainly dont need 8k. if you tell me you can tell the difference i will simply not believe you
Are we talking resolution or RAM/ROM sizes here?
-
you don't need 4k and you certainly dont need 8k. if you tell me you can tell the difference i will simply not believe you
@eniko I don’t need 8k but I do need retina-class resolution or I can’t read antialiased text (or text that is designed to be antialiased but isn’t — only bitmap fonts)
-
you don't need 4k and you certainly dont need 8k. if you tell me you can tell the difference i will simply not believe you
@eniko 4k is good for text and graphics, not really so important for games / video. 8k is kinda silly
-
you don't need 4k and you certainly dont need 8k. if you tell me you can tell the difference i will simply not believe you
@eniko I can absolutely tell the difference between 1440p and 4k (assuming 27″ displays); between 4k and 5k the difference is mostly unnoticeable, but 5k is slightly better for running old stuff, because it's integer-scaled at 200%, so not blurry.
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic
-
you don't need 4k and you certainly dont need 8k. if you tell me you can tell the difference i will simply not believe you
@eniko so putting aside that it is highly dependent on relative distance between the viewer and screen, and the size of the screen, my dissenting opinion is that 4k and 8k are both bad because we don't have cute pixel art icons anymore because of ever increasing screen resolutions. however, if screen resolutions keep going up eventually it'll be good again because then we can have crisp resolution independent pixel art icons without weird aliasing or quantizing artifacts
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@eniko so putting aside that it is highly dependent on relative distance between the viewer and screen, and the size of the screen, my dissenting opinion is that 4k and 8k are both bad because we don't have cute pixel art icons anymore because of ever increasing screen resolutions. however, if screen resolutions keep going up eventually it'll be good again because then we can have crisp resolution independent pixel art icons without weird aliasing or quantizing artifacts
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
Non sapevo che questa sigla fosse stata scritta da Brian Eno.
Sigle di inizio e di fine - TG3 - RaiTre - 5/11/1994
Youtube Video
-
@eniko I can absolutely tell the difference between 1440p and 4k (assuming 27″ displays); between 4k and 5k the difference is mostly unnoticeable, but 5k is slightly better for running old stuff, because it's integer-scaled at 200%, so not blurry.
-
@eniko 4k is good for text and graphics, not really so important for games / video. 8k is kinda silly
-
@eniko I don’t need 8k but I do need retina-class resolution or I can’t read antialiased text (or text that is designed to be antialiased but isn’t — only bitmap fonts)
-
Are we talking resolution or RAM/ROM sizes here?
