#ActivityPub developers only please: how many items should be in a full collection page?
General Discussion
9
Posts
5
Posters
3
Views
-
#ActivityPub developers only please: how many items should be in a full collection page?
-
#ActivityPub developers only please: how many items should be in a full collection page?
If you implement ActivityPub on the server side, feel free to reply with your page size policy.
-
#ActivityPub developers only please: how many items should be in a full collection page?
@evan@cosocial.ca I don't support polls on NodeBB yet so can't vote, but...
Default
perPageis 20*. This is configurable in the admin control panel.* except for user outboxes. That uses a cursor, not pages.
-
There is no option "it depends.. ". Shouldn't this depend on what you intend to use the collection for? A design choice depending on your use case and domain model.
Or is the missing context to the poll's question is "..in a typical fediverse microblogging environment"?
-
-
-
#ActivityPub developers only please: how many items should be in a full collection page?
@evan Totally depends on the collection, shouldn't it?
-
undefined evan@cosocial.ca shared this topic
-
#ActivityPub developers only please: how many items should be in a full collection page?
@evan configurable 😀
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@squinky dude
-
@smallcircles @alex @MichalBryxi it's pretty common on the Fediverse.
That said, I'd love to add vocabulary terms for it. And you could edit your actor object and add them.
-
@alex @smallcircles @evan Side note: After few decades in IT the #NoBot solution integrated into user profile *text* / bio is something that immediately sounds 🚨🔕🧯as something that will be problematic (as it’s just a monkey patch on an incorrect spot) and should be redesigned when accepted conceptually.
-
@MichalBryxi you only federate if there is a "connection" (I think "a user interacted with a post from the other instance" is enough to establish one)
-
@alex yes, your suggestion was a good one. I did not mean to call you out, just to stipulate the matter to Evan in the mentions and other AP devs. Sorry, if that was unclear.
-
> The NoBot isn't app specific fwiw, it's pretty standard.
"pretty" boils down to de-facto standard, or rather it became a sorta kinda requirement by means of post-facto #interoperability. In other words: Who comes first, and popularizes some custom app-specific extension, becomes owner of that part of the spec that is now considered protocol-native.
#NoBot is app-specific too. Or Microblogging domain-specific perhaps, albeit implicitly then.
When it comes to considering it standard, we talk about accepting #ActivityPub protocol decay. Specifically:
- Considering the way account profiles are handled to be part of the protocol.
- To handle special control words (or just #NoBot) in the profile text.
-
@alex Thanks for your time btw. I could as well just google it and read on the topic.
-
@alex Purely from technical perspective there is no need to have central server. IMO. You follow account, your server and their server exchange information about activity so that your server can give you information on what they did.
I don’t see a reason why the same could not happen for a hashtag. Your server knows which accounts you follow as well as hashtags. Collection can happen for both.
Network load and other real world limitations aside of course.
