Fascinating story from a software dev Fedi friend, shared with permission to keep it anonymous:
Uncategorized
19
Posts
10
Posters
4
Views
-
@inthehands Norbert Wiener wrote in 1948, in the book that defined Cybernetics:
"Let us remember that the automatic machine is the precise economic equivalent of slave labor. Any labor which competes with slave labor must accept the economic consequences of slave labor.”
@emenel @inthehands complete tangent, but this is the big honking injustice at the center of that beloved children's story setting: Star Wars. The Old and New Republics are both slave states -- it is not a neutral fact that 3P0 calls Luke 'master'.
You can't unsee it.
-
@emenel @inthehands complete tangent, but this is the big honking injustice at the center of that beloved children's story setting: Star Wars. The Old and New Republics are both slave states -- it is not a neutral fact that 3P0 calls Luke 'master'.
You can't unsee it.
@Unlikelylass @emenel
Yup. And the sin of the Empire is extending the slave boundary, not creating it. -
I agree with the storyteller: the experience of having a slave is abhorrent, simulated or not, and this story is a window into something •deep• about the present moment. Even without having slaves, we are all in danger of having a •slaver mindset•. It’s a disease that’s running rampant now in billionaire-shaped techno-utopian circles.
I wrote this thread on the topic earlier:
https://hachyderm.io/@inthehands/113295613785073188
…and even having written that, it’s still shocking — not surprising, exactly, but shocking — to hear those thoughts expressed so baldly by the colleague in the story above.
@inthehands I'm confused and feel like I'm missing something. But this feels like a category error.
No, we don't want slaves, real or virtual. But a machine cannot be enslaved, any more than a hammer can be. It's a tool, leave it alone and it does nothing. Tools are meant to be used.
Which is not to say that all tools are amoral, or should always be used. A machine to grind up puppies is a tool, sure, and also terrible and should not exist. But you did not force it to exist.
You don't want to treat people like tools, which is what slavery does - they're not people, they're machines, less than human.
You also don't want to treat machines as humans.
What am I missing? It feels this is like arguing over the taste of blue.
Edited to add: To be clear, I find this person's coworkers feelings to be terrible and seriously question the person's ethics and morality. So please don't take anything I'm saying as trying to excuse it. I just feel conclusions are being drawn that I don't see or understand
-
@inthehands I'm confused and feel like I'm missing something. But this feels like a category error.
No, we don't want slaves, real or virtual. But a machine cannot be enslaved, any more than a hammer can be. It's a tool, leave it alone and it does nothing. Tools are meant to be used.
Which is not to say that all tools are amoral, or should always be used. A machine to grind up puppies is a tool, sure, and also terrible and should not exist. But you did not force it to exist.
You don't want to treat people like tools, which is what slavery does - they're not people, they're machines, less than human.
You also don't want to treat machines as humans.
What am I missing? It feels this is like arguing over the taste of blue.
Edited to add: To be clear, I find this person's coworkers feelings to be terrible and seriously question the person's ethics and morality. So please don't take anything I'm saying as trying to excuse it. I just feel conclusions are being drawn that I don't see or understand
@Bfordham
The category error you are making is thinking that the distinction is about the •tool• instead of the •mindset of the person• who is using the tool.I’d also be disturbed by somebody who thinks of their hammer as a slave.
-
@inthehands like, what is the difference between a tool and a slave that lacks consciousness? I can only think that it’s in the way you treat it. You can’t be cruel to a tool. You can’t dominate a tool. You can’t derive status from being above a tool.
Blechhhh
@minmi @inthehands I dunno. One can be neglectful, abusive, or even purposely damage or destroy a tool. It does not have sentience, but the attitude of the user/abuser does say a lot. I've watched people bang the crap out of a hammer, chewing up the handle, and throwing it on the ground like an angry child.
-
@minmi @inthehands I dunno. One can be neglectful, abusive, or even purposely damage or destroy a tool. It does not have sentience, but the attitude of the user/abuser does say a lot. I've watched people bang the crap out of a hammer, chewing up the handle, and throwing it on the ground like an angry child.
-
@Unlikelylass @emenel
Yup. And the sin of the Empire is extending the slave boundary, not creating it.@inthehands @Unlikelylass @emenel Another one is the book Feet of Clay, by Terry Pratchett. Golems, artificial people, made to do work. Is it slavery? One of the characters says, "Of course it isn't. You might as well try to enslave a table." But it is.
-
@inthehands @Unlikelylass @emenel Another one is the book Feet of Clay, by Terry Pratchett. Golems, artificial people, made to do work. Is it slavery? One of the characters says, "Of course it isn't. You might as well try to enslave a table." But it is.
@benfulton @inthehands @Unlikelylass @emenel hi, isn't there at least one book where a woman takes on the job to fight for their rights? The one where they invent the postal office, I think. My memory is fuzzy. And she is treated more seriously by the narrative than, say, Hermione fighting for elf rights. Admittedly a low bar.
-
@benfulton @inthehands @Unlikelylass @emenel hi, isn't there at least one book where a woman takes on the job to fight for their rights? The one where they invent the postal office, I think. My memory is fuzzy. And she is treated more seriously by the narrative than, say, Hermione fighting for elf rights. Admittedly a low bar.
Yes, and over the course of several novels the golems free each other and become a (very odd) balancing force in the Discworld international system. Optimistic, but there’s not a surplus of that going around.
-
@inthehands Norbert Wiener wrote in 1948, in the book that defined Cybernetics:
"Let us remember that the automatic machine is the precise economic equivalent of slave labor. Any labor which competes with slave labor must accept the economic consequences of slave labor.”
@emenel @jimbob @inthehands So labour-saving devices like dishwashers and washing machines are morally reprehensible, and the only ethical alternative is to do the work manually or pay someone a fair price for their time and labour? That’s quite a take…
-
@emenel @jimbob @inthehands So labour-saving devices like dishwashers and washing machines are morally reprehensible, and the only ethical alternative is to do the work manually or pay someone a fair price for their time and labour? That’s quite a take…
You are confusing the words “economic” and “moral.”
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic on
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
There are still so many features that had been introduced there (client-side includes with fallback, “everything is a link”, etc) that are still sorely missing 8-(
I wonder if there was also a growing dislike for XML in general behind this choice? (hurr durr namespace confusing). It's ironic that we have to thank MS for pushing for the little support of XML in browsers we still have (and they are now working on removing 8-/).
-
IIRC the WHATWG was set up before Google had its own browser (I think it was Mozilla + Opera + Apple at the time?) and it almost made sense, although there was no reason to ditch XHTML 2.0 altogether. What really drives me mad is that EVEN IF one could consider the XEvent and XForms interface to be suboptimal for the kind of “dynamic” web that was being pushed (possibly by Google behind the scenes) that was really no reason to throw away the whole of XHTML 2.
-
Must see from @euronews
Fact check: Is the EU launching a social media platform called #WSocial?
"A spokesperson for the European Commission told The Cube, Euronews' fact-checking team, that the EU is not launching or funding any social media platform, and that there is currently no EU-backed project called "W"
[...] W is a privately owned social media start-up incorporated in Sweden, backed by private investors mainly from the Nordic region."
Please share widely
-
@aeva My thoughts on the moon...
-
Nella cattolicissima #Malta è in vigore la legge sull'#aborto più retriva d'Europa. Mentre la società civile chiede una norma più laica il governo prova a uscire dall'imbarazzo promettendo la grazia per le donne condannate per interruzione di gravidanza.👇
https://www.quotidiano.net/luce/attualita/aborto-malta-8bd29db4
-
Does this mean that capitalism is about making money and not defending rights?
Wow, who would have ever thought...
-
By the way, whenever I'm in the West, my confidence in my English speaking really takes a hit. I have a hard time understanding people if they speak even a little bit fast, and I feel like communication is a struggle because my own accent is so strong. 😩
