This is how the new Loops app Notifications screen looks like.
General Discussion
8
Posts
3
Posters
22
Views
-
This is how the new Loops app Notifications screen looks like.
Notice the lack of webfinger addresses, and the instant action buttons like Reply and Like?
All of these notifications are from remote accounts, but we hide the complexity of federation and only show the relevant details.
Pretty cool eh?
-
This is how the new Loops app Notifications screen looks like.
Notice the lack of webfinger addresses, and the instant action buttons like Reply and Like?
All of these notifications are from remote accounts, but we hide the complexity of federation and only show the relevant details.
Pretty cool eh?
@dansup I'm not sure if hiding the instance is a good idea. I mean, in the fediverse our usernames are both the handle and the instance, and if we start losing the notion of instance…
-
@dansup I'm not sure if hiding the instance is a good idea. I mean, in the fediverse our usernames are both the handle and the instance, and if we start losing the notion of instance…
@manum we actually never show the full username unless you view the account, we use the display name, like TikTok
-
@manum we actually never show the full username unless you view the account, we use the display name, like TikTok
@dansup @manum It does not seem that the TikTok design carries well to a federated situation. You can use a display name to trivially impersonate someone else. User names+instance are used to verify an account.
"BBC News liked your post"
"BBC News (troll@randominstance) liked your post. "
"BBC News (news@bbc.co.uk) liked your post"
-
@dansup @manum It does not seem that the TikTok design carries well to a federated situation. You can use a display name to trivially impersonate someone else. User names+instance are used to verify an account.
"BBC News liked your post"
"BBC News (troll@randominstance) liked your post. "
"BBC News (news@bbc.co.uk) liked your post"
-
-
-
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@bengo i'm genuinely curious to hear your thoughts on this matter, because it seems to me like activitypub and fedi were never really on the same page, and the w3c spec diverged from the mastodon network almost before it was ever published. is there a path to fixing this within w3c cg/wg structure? what does that look like? are there any other paths?
-
> It's a bad and unfair idea [to make class 3 and 4 changes] [...] Totally respect your position if you disagree
i'm not super familiar with the w3c process but from a pragmatic standpoint what do you do when userspace is already broken and nothing is class conformant?
activitystreams was intended to describe streams of activities, and activitypub was intended for publishing activities to those streams of activities. no one in fedi does this. they syndicate posts and discard activities
-
@SimonTB @javahippie no fosdem for me unfortunately. Keep an eye out for the first commits. Still mulling over a testing strategy that is manageable and not too complex.
-
@tokyo_0 Whoever shows up and contributes. So you could!
-
@myfear @javahippie looks like what I've been wanting to build for a long time. Even similar tech stack (Java + Postgres). Guess it'll be hard to contribute as long as there's no existing code, right? But I'll keep an eye out for my chance to join #OpenPace :)
You guys don't happen to be at #FOSDEM to discuss about this project? Note: I'm not sure yet, if I can make it to FOSDEM this year.
-
@julian yes. BadgeFed has an API. But the concept is really simple, it is a Note (or Document) that has an attachment. The attachment is a property of the ActivityPub object usually used for videos or images. In this case the attachment includes a full OpenBadge object.
The only restriction is that the Note attributed (activitypub actor) MUST be the url in the OpenBadge issuer (issuer = actor). Also the recipient url from the OpenBadge SHOULD be mentioned in the Note.
With this simple mechanism you can pretty much create a compatible badge that can be decentralized with BadgeFed.
-
This needs integration with #GadgetBridge, of course
-
@mapache@hachyderm.io from what I understand you're using the ActivityPub note for compatibility. I wonder if a custom object type might open more doors.
Doesn't really matter, just thinking out loud 🙂
Does BadgeFed have an API to create new badges? Or fetch badges?
