@evan @darius what about switching to YAML for ActivityPub 2.0
-
@evan @darius what about switching to YAML for #ActivityPub 2.0
https://www.w3.org/TR/yaml-ld-10/
why? because we could!
😅 </irony>
-
@evan @darius what about switching to YAML for #ActivityPub 2.0
https://www.w3.org/TR/yaml-ld-10/
why? because we could!
😅 </irony>
@pfefferle @evan @darius “We've heard your criticisms about JSON-LD loud and clear, so today the Working Group is proud to announce...” 😇
-
@pfefferle @evan @darius “We've heard your criticisms about JSON-LD loud and clear, so today the Working Group is proud to announce...” 😇
-
@evan @darius what about switching to YAML for #ActivityPub 2.0
https://www.w3.org/TR/yaml-ld-10/
why? because we could!
😅 </irony>
@pfefferle@mastodon.social @darius@friend.camp @evan@cosocial.ca well all well-formed json is valid yaml so... it could
-
@evan @darius what about switching to YAML for #ActivityPub 2.0
https://www.w3.org/TR/yaml-ld-10/
why? because we could!
😅 </irony>
The great thing about YAML is that nothing would need changing except for the specs, because JSON is valid YAML hahaha
-
@evan @darius what about switching to YAML for #ActivityPub 2.0
https://www.w3.org/TR/yaml-ld-10/
why? because we could!
😅 </irony>
-
@evan @darius what about switching to YAML for #ActivityPub 2.0
https://www.w3.org/TR/yaml-ld-10/
why? because we could!
😅 </irony>
@pfefferle @evan @darius I’d say no to this but I’d be worried it would interpret it as Norway
-
@evan @darius what about switching to YAML for #ActivityPub 2.0
https://www.w3.org/TR/yaml-ld-10/
why? because we could!
😅 </irony>
@darius @pfefferle @evan You made me google the truly cursed search term "toml schema". Do not google that. -
@evan @darius what about switching to YAML for #ActivityPub 2.0
https://www.w3.org/TR/yaml-ld-10/
why? because we could!
😅 </irony>
@pfefferle @evan @darius would break all norway instances 😰
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic