Companies react to SF possibly reviving the Overpaid Executive Tax:
Uncategorized
3
Posts
3
Posters
0
Views
-
Companies react to SF possibly reviving the Overpaid Executive Tax:
-
Companies react to SF possibly reviving the Overpaid Executive Tax:
@jef I wonder if this is cash salary or total remuneration including stocks and gifts, etc.
-
Companies react to SF possibly reviving the Overpaid Executive Tax:
@jef Heads you lose, tails I win
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic on
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
-
@strypey @darius a good example might be adding a description of how the `replies` collection is managed.
-
@strypey @darius I think that's about right. Darius may have more details.
And we should probably be clear about the change in the AP spec. It will likely be iterative and backwards compatible. A lot of the work will be clarifying badly defined behavior, adding more and better examples, and so on. It's going to be evolutionary, not revolutionary.
-
@Cheeseness why not in peertube? @davidrevoy @doctormo
-
@evan @maj
So the third item should be "Anyone who are following both Alice and Bob" to be clear. Current form of the item (candidate) can be read "Anyone following whichever Alice or Bob, but not both" as I've confused.
-
Quizzino della domenica: a,b
@matematica - Non sbagliatevi con le operazioni aritmetiche..
-
@evan You asked "should", not "does", so my answer is "only people who follow *both* Alice and Bob", that is, the intersection of both sets of followers. (Your 3rd option, to me, reads like "people who follow *either*", that is, the union.)
Whether Alice-only follower Carol (resp. Bob-only follower Dave) should gain access to Bob's reply by following Bob (resp. Alice) after Bob's reply is unclear to me.
-
@dubito_ergo_sum @sport ma soprattutto perché l'arabo che alle olimpiadi invernali è pressoché inesistente e non il cinese per esempio?
