120 – Perché non bloccano i contenuti pericolosi online?
Uncategorized
1
Posts
1
Posters
0
Views
-
120 – Perché non bloccano i contenuti pericolosi online? https://www.camisanicalzolari.it/120-perche-non-bloccano-i-contenuti-pericolosi-online/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon
-
undefined Cybersecurity & cyberwarfare shared this topic
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@aeva yes. i think it was my mum who ultimately had the last word. i don't simply fall in line when told to so you can imagine what an achievement of her it was to make me stop fighting forever. and i think she only could because she had a very similar phase in her youth.
(you never get rid of it completely. there is always a danger of getting swept up in the moment.)
-
@jana I'm usually using them only as 4g routers. I'm usually managing the failover at a higher level, using the main router (so directing the traffic to the 4g one only if the main routes are down). Sometimes I use the 4g as a "power up" solution, when clients have some traffic spikes. Sometimes, I send all the "guest" traffic to 4g, to keep the main traffic paths empty
-
@lritter actually i don't think that narrows it down, there's like a lot of parables involving wolves. what is with wolves that they're in so many parables?
-
-
@stefano I see, so I assume that device then also acts as the router and does the failover?
-
@lritter regardless there's a whole parable about what stops people from coming to the aid of vulnerable community members and it involves wolves and stuff
-
@lritter having not been there i can only speculate, but there could be other factors at play like whoever came to her support being someone whose trust she had earned, and/or then correctly recognizing you were an asshole
-
@jana it depends. If it's a simple 4g failover and the coverage is good, a MikroTik hAP ax lite LTE6 is more than enough. Otherwise, a MikroTik Chateu or, if the client has other devices, I use them, too.
