#Substack openly platforms—and profits from—#Nazis.
Uncategorized
9
Posts
9
Posters
3
Views
-
#Substack openly platforms—and profits from—#Nazis. And not just nudge-nudge-wink-wink types of Nazis, but literal black-swastika “NatSoc” Nazis. And they recommend Nazi writers.
If you are still on Substack either as a reader or publisher, please seriously consider leaving the platform. It’s a Nazi bar. You don’t want to give them your money or your attention. I hear ghost dot org is a great, Nazi-free alternative.
-
#Substack openly platforms—and profits from—#Nazis. And not just nudge-nudge-wink-wink types of Nazis, but literal black-swastika “NatSoc” Nazis. And they recommend Nazi writers.
If you are still on Substack either as a reader or publisher, please seriously consider leaving the platform. It’s a Nazi bar. You don’t want to give them your money or your attention. I hear ghost dot org is a great, Nazi-free alternative.
@drahardja Ghost is awesome and part of the Fediverse (so are WriteFreely and MicroBlog)
-
#Substack openly platforms—and profits from—#Nazis. And not just nudge-nudge-wink-wink types of Nazis, but literal black-swastika “NatSoc” Nazis. And they recommend Nazi writers.
If you are still on Substack either as a reader or publisher, please seriously consider leaving the platform. It’s a Nazi bar. You don’t want to give them your money or your attention. I hear ghost dot org is a great, Nazi-free alternative.
@drahardja @jwz this has been a thing for a long time.
The pattern is that someone notices, people complain loudly, protest peters out, more anti-nazi or just otherwise decent people hold their noses and start blogs there anyway, expect subscribers to pay the tithe while not acknowledging the conflict at all, wash rinse repeat.
It’s almost like protesting without naming names is ineffective, and rationalization is complicity.
One doesn’t fight nazis by subsidizing nazis, and bu choosing to produce or consume on the platform, that is effectively what one does.
-
#Substack openly platforms—and profits from—#Nazis. And not just nudge-nudge-wink-wink types of Nazis, but literal black-swastika “NatSoc” Nazis. And they recommend Nazi writers.
If you are still on Substack either as a reader or publisher, please seriously consider leaving the platform. It’s a Nazi bar. You don’t want to give them your money or your attention. I hear ghost dot org is a great, Nazi-free alternative.
This is the quite stance:
"We don't like Nazis either, but they're not going away. So we might as well make money off them."
– Substack founder Hamish McKenzieParaphrasing slightly. But barely.
-
#Substack openly platforms—and profits from—#Nazis. And not just nudge-nudge-wink-wink types of Nazis, but literal black-swastika “NatSoc” Nazis. And they recommend Nazi writers.
If you are still on Substack either as a reader or publisher, please seriously consider leaving the platform. It’s a Nazi bar. You don’t want to give them your money or your attention. I hear ghost dot org is a great, Nazi-free alternative.
@drahardja
WriteFreeley? -
#Substack openly platforms—and profits from—#Nazis. And not just nudge-nudge-wink-wink types of Nazis, but literal black-swastika “NatSoc” Nazis. And they recommend Nazi writers.
If you are still on Substack either as a reader or publisher, please seriously consider leaving the platform. It’s a Nazi bar. You don’t want to give them your money or your attention. I hear ghost dot org is a great, Nazi-free alternative.
@drahardja Just a moment ago I posted a question here on Mastodon asking whether sites - such as Substack, that take a piece of the revenue from content posted by others - are protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996?
It seems that in such cases (and this also includes youtube) that the premises underlying immunity in Section 230 are not met, that the website is not a mere conduit, but is, rather, an active partner in the content and thus ought to share liability with the creator.
I'm not a Section 230 expert and would be interested to hear an expert's point of view on this.
-
@drahardja Just a moment ago I posted a question here on Mastodon asking whether sites - such as Substack, that take a piece of the revenue from content posted by others - are protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996?
It seems that in such cases (and this also includes youtube) that the premises underlying immunity in Section 230 are not met, that the website is not a mere conduit, but is, rather, an active partner in the content and thus ought to share liability with the creator.
I'm not a Section 230 expert and would be interested to hear an expert's point of view on this.
@karlauerbach @drahardja whoever told you that is mistaken
-
#Substack openly platforms—and profits from—#Nazis. And not just nudge-nudge-wink-wink types of Nazis, but literal black-swastika “NatSoc” Nazis. And they recommend Nazi writers.
If you are still on Substack either as a reader or publisher, please seriously consider leaving the platform. It’s a Nazi bar. You don’t want to give them your money or your attention. I hear ghost dot org is a great, Nazi-free alternative.
Ghost charges $15 USD monthly (minimum) so it isn't for people who can't spare $180 per year. It's free to use if you run it on your own server.
If you have a Wordpress blog you can use a plugin called "Activitypub for Wordpress" to integrate it with the fediverse. It's had some good recent updates and looks pretty functional. Haven't tried it, though.
-
@drahardja Just a moment ago I posted a question here on Mastodon asking whether sites - such as Substack, that take a piece of the revenue from content posted by others - are protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996?
It seems that in such cases (and this also includes youtube) that the premises underlying immunity in Section 230 are not met, that the website is not a mere conduit, but is, rather, an active partner in the content and thus ought to share liability with the creator.
I'm not a Section 230 expert and would be interested to hear an expert's point of view on this.
@karlauerbach @drahardja I mean, who tf knows with the current court and their absolute contempt for precedent, but imo as someone who has had to teach media law, that would really be a stretch. It should take more than getting paid for providing publishing tools, Substack would have to exercise editorial control. You could argue their bad behavior is actually evidence they don’t.
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@cykonot sorry to hear that. It's bizarre what's happening in the US. I installed TikTok again last night because it's one the few ways left to get news from the US that isn't propaganda.
-
Il disagio causato dalle #campane rumorose oltre i limiti di legge è diffuso. Riceviamo tante richieste di aiuto da persone esasperate allo sportello SOS Laicità.
Per difendersi dalle campane "selvagge" 👇
https://www.uaar.it/laicita/campane/
-
La paralisi di Bruxelles mette a rischio il controllo europeo sui social network
Per vedere altri post come questo, segui la comunità @informatica
La debolezza della Commissione nell’applicare il Digital Services Act apre la strada a iniziative nazionali sui social network, alimenta lo scontro con le Big Tech e minaccia la tenuta del mercato
-
@fucinafibonacci @antonej @dubito_ergo_sum @sport
@fucinafibonacci @dubito_ergo_sum speravo di non aver capito bene, e invece
1) certo, e se mio nonno avesse avuto le ruote sarebbe stato una carriola. Cosa c'entra?
2) Sì, anche. E viceversa. Così funziona quando si è famosi
3) come sopra. Non vedo il nesso. E comunque ogni persona comunica o non comunica i suoi messaggi con i suoi mezzi e con i suoi modi.
-
Croazia, Plitvice: siamo tutti acqua (lo splendido parco dei laghi mi insegnato ad accettarmi).
In questo episodio, il n. 13, rifletto sul passato sanguinoso della zona vicina ai laghi di Plitvice in Croazia.
Si può davvero fermare l'umanità, i suoi spostsmenti? Ha senso provarci?
-
@elettrona grazie per la citazione! ❤️ Ma soprattutto per avere riconosciuto lo sforzo e l'impegno che metto dietro ad ogni episodio. Personalmente non mi sognerei mai di dire "sulle principali piattaforme" se il podcast non è distribuito per benino. Forse chi ha scritto l'articolo pensa che esista solo Spotify. Non è sarcasmo il mio, ma purtroppo è molto comune. È li, su spotify e ai meno attenti basta.
A proposito, ho appena distribuito la puntata n. 13 su castopod! 😃
-
@monja @dubito_ergo_sum @sport Uh! Ah! https://video.sky.it/skyuno/questo-e-sky/video/gialappashow-882544
-
@RnDanger they made the announcement, not me.
Laws are always enforced selectively. It could be argued that going to first friday is a "reasonable, legitimate and specific business or activity directed or permitted by [his] parent“
https://phoenix.municipal.codes/CC/22-1
Like, it's a legitimate event, and they could just leave them kids alone and not assault crowds. They didn't ask the youths if they had permission, and their parents could easily be in the crowd lol
Post suggeriti
-
-
-
It’s horrifying how many of our global issues have been caused by three white men in their seventies clinging to power to avoid prison.'n— John Boursheid'n#politics #tyranny #FascistAmeriKKKa #OrangeRapist #Putin #Netanyahu #nazis
Uncategorized
1
-
"The purpose of propaganda is to make one set of people forget that other sets of people are human."-- Aldous Huxley#politics #Propaganda #FascistAmeriKKKa #Nazis #Tyranny #OrangeTyrant #Racism #misogyny #bigots
Uncategorized
1
