Awwwwwws!..

[alterelefant@mastodontech.de]

@rysiek A lot of organisations have a very predictable usage of their services or products and therefore do not have the need for dynamic scalability. It is not difficult to maintain your own hardware for (web) hosting, hell, it might even be more affordable in the long run. Well, actually it is more affordable and is also makes you less susceptible for these kind of outages.

[frelsisbaratta@flokinet.social]

@rysiek they said it is unavoidable.
Self hosting is not stable. Does not scale.
What can go wrong :)

[stuart@social.brainsys.com]

@rysiek

Nice to know Amazon is protecting my confidential gov.uk data by denying access. Presumably it's even safe from both US & Chinese agency probes for the duration ;-)

Why is it stored in US-East?

[rysiek@mstdn.social]

Wow this is going to be massively, massively expensive for AWS due to all the contractual penalties they'll have to pay out to their clients based on their five-nines SLA contracts and hahahahahaha nope just joking why would Amazon agree to any such thing!

[rysiek@mstdn.social]

If you're wondering what AWS is, it's kinda like the operating system of the corporate Internet.

I call it bezOS.

[hugoestr@functional.cafe]

@alterelefant @rysiek But then you must pay a salary! Or two! Nooooooo /s

[szbalint@x0r.be]

@rysiek “here are some free AI credits for the outage, now fuck off”

…is my predicted AWS response

[alterelefant@mastodontech.de]

@hugoestr Or find a local company and pay them in order to do it for you. #SupportLocal
@rysiek

[raboof@merveilles.town]

@szbalint @rysiek "We will not charge you for the period in which our services were unavailable - and you'll thank us for it."

[rysiek@mstdn.social]

This would be a good time to ask Amazon how much of their stuff is vibe coded.

#AWS