Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

Random idea: a federated alternative to Amazon Prime built from independent shops?

Fediverse
28 24 0
  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Yoooo, fediverse ecom?! I love that idea.

    And it's totally doable. Ecom has been going through a "headless" revolution for a while now, meaning way better APIs and metadata.

    There's A LOT of problems in the ecom world around product images, availavle inventory, and metadata accuracy, but it's definitely worth exploring.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Love the idea in concept. One major issue is the shipping. A major benefit of Amazon is just being able to add 20 things to your cart and get them all in like 1-2 boxes. In this hypothetical scenario, you'd presumably still have to handle checkout through each individual store, and if you ordered 20 things, you'd be placing up to 20 individual orders, each with their own shipping costs.

    This becomes more problematic when maybe multiple stores you're buying from sell multiple things on your list... ideal case would be to buy as many things from one store as possible, to consolidate shipping, but what if their prices for the individual items vary? Now you've got to search each individual storefront for each item and calculate the difference in cost. (This store sells item A for $2 cheaper but shipping is $3.50, is there another item I can add in to save shipping? They sell item B for $0.50 more, but I might save on shipping costs...)

    Technically this is no worse than it is now if you're shopping from a variety of stores rather than one megastore, but it would be a large barrier to adoption if you're trying to capture some of the "fed up with Amazon but still like the convenience" crowd.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    We have this in Czechia. Search engines that aggregate many small web shops together into a single search. Then you can go to whichever shop has the best deal or whatever. It's what we use locally instead of Amazon, and I always feel much better giving my money directly to the small specialty shops. It's not technically federated I guess but it achieves the same thing.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    This is basically eBay.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Requires a fully funded and staffed public postal service in a county that's dismantling, privatizing, and outsourcing core components of public sector package shipping

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Not quite what you want but Flohmarkt (flea market in German) is federated. https://codeberg.org/flohmarkt/flohmarkt

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    The biggest problem I see is that retailers generally don't want to increase visibility for their competition. Competition usually lowers prices, good for consumers, but business is not a fan. Even in non competing markets, consumers only have a limited amount of money. That $50 you spent on clothes is $50 not spent on power tools. The main reason some sell on markets like eBay/amazon/etc is because they're so large and centralized that you can't really avoid them.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Amazon is more “warehousing and fulfillment” than it is “storefront”.

    This would be hard to replicate without immense capital.

  • We have this in Czechia. Search engines that aggregate many small web shops together into a single search. Then you can go to whichever shop has the best deal or whatever. It's what we use locally instead of Amazon, and I always feel much better giving my money directly to the small specialty shops. It's not technically federated I guess but it achieves the same thing.

    We had this in Greece and it was great. Then you could order through the aggregator itself. Then it got its own delivery service that shops could use (still better than all other delivery companies). Then shops were added that don't have their own site nor a physical shop. Now it's trying to expand to other countries and there is a subscription that gives you lower delivery fees. It's still good and most people buy stuff from there but it's clear it's trying to become Amazon and I'm afraid most similar centralized services will go this way sooner or later.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    I mean, I buy stuff off eBay a lot, and it's often from small mom-and-pop shops. I needed new ribbon for my typewriter recently and ended up getting it from a store that just sells ink ribbons. They have an off-eBay presence too.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    A Search and streamlined payment program would be neat, but customer support and other things would have to be the responsibility of each store, so at minimum you'd have to gather stuff like contact info and return policies in a standardized way to show users

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    I love this idea!

  • We had this in Greece and it was great. Then you could order through the aggregator itself. Then it got its own delivery service that shops could use (still better than all other delivery companies). Then shops were added that don't have their own site nor a physical shop. Now it's trying to expand to other countries and there is a subscription that gives you lower delivery fees. It's still good and most people buy stuff from there but it's clear it's trying to become Amazon and I'm afraid most similar centralized services will go this way sooner or later.

    This is kinda the same process amazon itself went through back in the day

  • Love the idea in concept. One major issue is the shipping. A major benefit of Amazon is just being able to add 20 things to your cart and get them all in like 1-2 boxes. In this hypothetical scenario, you'd presumably still have to handle checkout through each individual store, and if you ordered 20 things, you'd be placing up to 20 individual orders, each with their own shipping costs.

    This becomes more problematic when maybe multiple stores you're buying from sell multiple things on your list... ideal case would be to buy as many things from one store as possible, to consolidate shipping, but what if their prices for the individual items vary? Now you've got to search each individual storefront for each item and calculate the difference in cost. (This store sells item A for $2 cheaper but shipping is $3.50, is there another item I can add in to save shipping? They sell item B for $0.50 more, but I might save on shipping costs...)

    Technically this is no worse than it is now if you're shopping from a variety of stores rather than one megastore, but it would be a large barrier to adoption if you're trying to capture some of the "fed up with Amazon but still like the convenience" crowd.

    A major benefit of Amazon is just being able to add 20 things to your cart and get them all in like 1-2 boxes.

    If this has worked for you in the last 5 years, your Amazon experience has been very different than mine.

    It was wonderful, when they did that.

  • A major benefit of Amazon is just being able to add 20 things to your cart and get them all in like 1-2 boxes.

    If this has worked for you in the last 5 years, your Amazon experience has been very different than mine.

    It was wonderful, when they did that.

    I had a horrible Amazon experience 3 or 4 years ago and haven't shopped there since, so I'm probably remembering the time when it did work.

  • Not quite what you want but Flohmarkt (flea market in German) is federated. https://codeberg.org/flohmarkt/flohmarkt

    Are there any instances of this? It looks promising

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Amazon is local independt shops too, and better shipping, I just wouldnt do that to myself when amazon exists and ik I can get returns + fast shipping, you need buyers, more than a few altruistic ppl

  • We have this in Czechia. Search engines that aggregate many small web shops together into a single search. Then you can go to whichever shop has the best deal or whatever. It's what we use locally instead of Amazon, and I always feel much better giving my money directly to the small specialty shops. It's not technically federated I guess but it achieves the same thing.

    Like the other comments said, it's prob on it's way to becoming it's own amazon like figure there, thats how they start out

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    I think this is a good idea


Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
  • Sounds like Rakuten actually...

    read more

  • This is kind of how it works in countries that haven’t been infected by Amazon Prime. In Sweden for example most e-commerce is done directly from individual stores. There are aggregation sites like prisjakt which lists prices of all different stores so you can find the best deal.

    It’s not perfect and maybe not as convenient as Amazon Prime, but I don’t see how a fediverse alternative could do it better.

    read more

  • Try shopping on Discogs or EBay. They both can handle a single cart with multiple vendor items shipping from different places.

    read more

  • read more

  • The main reason for a store to sign up on a website would be:

    Advertising Centralised shipping Centralised handling of payments (and note, this one is especially hard due to laws surrounding KYC and complexities in handling different payment methods)

    The Fediverse, being decentralised, has a hard time implementing the latter two. The first is basically not much different than being discoverable on Google.

    So fun as it sounds, it won't be easy to implement. You'd likely have to have independent "shippers" and PSPs sign up to this, and somehow have webshops choose which to use. And that's a very awkward structure for a Fediverse-minded solution.

    read more

  • There are actually 2. One is being more blatant about this and enshittifying in its attempt to be more like Amazon and hide the sellers. The other one is trying ads/subscription. I use the second.

    read more

  • In the near-term, a better idea might be to establish an alternative under a co-op model, like Subvert is trying to do for music as a Bandcamp successor. Vendors are part-owners of the entity and have input into its governance. Any code should be open source, too. Federation would be great to later help turn it into a truly resilient global platform.

    read more

  • I think this is a good idea

    read more
Post suggeriti
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    6 Views
    Destroying Autocracy – December 04, 2025Welcome to this week’s “Destroying Autocracy”.It’s your source for curated news affecting democracy in the cyber arena with a focus on protecting it. That necessitates an opinionated Butlerian jihad against big tech as well as evangelizing for open-source and the Fediverse. Since big media’s journalism wing is flailing and failing in its core duty to democracy, this is also a collection of alternative reporting on the eternal battle between autocracy and democracy. We also cover the cybersecurity world. You can’t be free without safety and privacy.FYI, my opinions will be in bold. And will often involve cursing. Because humans. Especially tech bros. And fascists. Fuck ’em.The Programmer’s Fulcrum is the future (and smaller) home for a fusion of Symfony Station and Battalion. Its tagline is Devs Defending Democracy, Developing the OMN.You can sign up now and for 2025 get an email with links to each week’s Symfony Station Communiqué and Battalion “Destroying Autocracy” post along with their featured articles. And you’ll be set with TPF after the fusing in January.We are posting on the Fediverse now at @thefulcrum @thefulcrum.dev and original website content will start next month.Featured Item(s)Hamish Campbell writes:ActivityPub is a shared vocabulary, a public language for moving meaning and connection across the open web. It gives you nouns and verbs, and the community defines the grammar through lived use.This is why the OMN works with ActivityPub, a metadata and meaning layer, not a platform, flows, not silos. ActivityPub is the widely deployed 4 Opens protocol that treats publishing as a flow, a conversation.Unlike the more vertical stacks (ATProto is a good example), ActivityPub doesn’t force a worldview. It doesn’t tell you, “this is how your network must be structured.” It doesn’t enforce hierarchy or lock you into one interpretation of identity, authority, or workflow. It’s a KISS path – here’s a shared language, verbs for publishing and receiving, express objects, updates, relationships. The rest is up to the commons.This flexibility is exactly why the OMN can become a part of this flow.Why the OMN works with ActivityPub – And why we need a bridge to p2pWe start and end with good news to make the middle bearable.The response to Russia’s War Crimes, Techno Feudalism, and other douchebaggeryDDEV has:Power Through Blackouts: How DDEV Community Helped Me in UkraineTechPolicy Press shares:How to Test New York’s Algorithmic Pricing LawThe EU’s Digital Omnibus Must Be Rejected by Lawmakers. Here is Why.Singapore announced an:Issuance of Implementation Directives to Apple and Google Under the Online Criminal Harms ActThe MIT Press Reader has:The Secret History of Tor: How a Military Project Became a Lifeline for PrivacyThe Guardian reports:Irish authorities asked to investigate Microsoft over alleged unlawful data processing by IDFNeutralTechPolicy Press reports:What the European Commission and Civil Society Both Get Wrong on the Digital OmnibusWhy Platforms Don’t Catch Climate Misinformation — and How to Change ThatEuroNews asks:Which European countries are building their own sovereign AI to compete in the tech race?Numerama reports:Mistral AI dévoile Mistral 3 et Ministral : des modèles qui replacent la France sur la scène open sourceTechCrunch reports:Mistral closes in on Big AI rivals with new open-weight frontier and small modelsWired reports:The Age-Gated Internet Is Sweeping the states. Activists Are Fighting Back.The Evil Empire (AKA Autocracy) Strikes BackThe Electronic Frontier Foundation reports:Lawmakers Want to Ban VPNs—And They Have No Idea What They’re DoingEDRi has:Promises unkept: The EU-US Data Privacy Framework under fire404 Media reports:Flock Uses Overseas Gig Workers to Build its Surveillance AIPariah StatesDarkReading reports:Tomiris Unleashes ‘Havoc’ With New Tools, TacticsDPRK’s ‘Contagious Interview’ Spawns Malicious Npm Package FactoryStudent Sells Gov’t, University Sites to Chinese ActorsTechPolicy Press reports:The Gulf’s AI Rise and the Risk of Entrenching AuthoritarianismThe Register reports:Stealthy browser extensions waited years before infecting 4.3M Chrome, Edge users with backdoors and spywareChina using AI as ‘precision instrument’ of censorship and repression, at home and abroadBig MediaAxios reports:Fox News hires Palantir to build AI newsroom toolsBig surprise.Big TechThe Guardian reports:How big tech is creating its own friendly media bubble to ‘win the narrative battle online’More than 1,000 Amazon workers warn rapid AI rollout threatens jobs and climateAnti-immigrant material among AI-generated content getting billions of views on TikTokBleepingComputer reports:Leak confirms OpenAI is preparing ads on ChatGPT for public roll outBig surprise here. But, if you’re amoral enough to use it, you deserve all the privacy invading ads you get.Google deletes X post after getting caught using a ‘stolen’ AI recipe infographicNature reports:Major AI conference flooded with peer reviews written fully by AIWow.The Guardian reports:The question isn’t whether the AI bubble will burst – but what the fallout will beNational Review reports:Meta Researchers Privately Compared Instagram to Addictive Drug, Bombshell Court Filing ShowsWanna-be Big TechOMG Unbuntu has:Mozilla’s ‘Rewiring’ to AI – Saving the Web or Saving Itself?Cybersecurity/PrivacyTechCrunch reports:European cops shut down crypto mixing website that helped launder 1.3B eurosDarkReading reports:New Raptor Framework Uses Agentic Workflows to Create PatchesBleeping Computer reports:Fake Calendly invites spoof top brands to hijack ad manager accountsThe Register reports:Microsoft quietly shuts down Windows shortcut flaw after years of espionage abuseFediverseCoywolf has:Mastodon creator shares what went wrong with Threads and ponders the future of the fediverseBen Werdmuller shares:Introducing RoundaboutSean Coates explores:The Fediverse and Content Creation: MonetizationGreat and important stuff.Ploum asks:Is Pixelfed sawing off the branch that the Fediverse is sitting on?Wouldn’t the fix to this would be to show a larger version of a user’s profile image with text posts?RSSPlanet Codigo has:Mi solución RSS con software libre y autogestionadoSlightly Decentralized Social MediaTBDCTAs (aka show us some free love)That’s it for this week. Please share this edition of Destroying Autocracy.Follow me on the Fediverse. Or this site via the button in the footer. Or via RSS. Or even our future home in 2026, if you want a head start.Keep fighting!Ringleader, BattalionReuben Walker Follow me on the Fediverse#ActivityPub #AI #Autocracy #BigJournalism #BigTech #Democracy #Fascism #Fediverse #Mastodon #Pixelfed #Roundabout #RSS #StopChina #StopIsrael #StopRedAmerica #StopRussia #SupportUkraine #TechnoAnarchism #TechnoFeudalism #Threadshttps://battalion.mobileatom.net/?p=4147
  • Good morning Fedi friends!

    Fediverso fediverse
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    17 Views
    @thriftygamer83 amen to that ! 🙌
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    17 Views
    I've gone live!Fireside Fedi - Episode 58 - Connector, Instigator, Maker#owncast #streaming #interview #fediverse #fedi #people #show #firesidefedi #FsFhttps://stream.firesidefedi.live
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    31 Views
    Piefed would do an on-demand pull of the content.