Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

Random idea: a federated alternative to Amazon Prime built from independent shops?

Fediverse
28 24 0
  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Yoooo, fediverse ecom?! I love that idea.

    And it's totally doable. Ecom has been going through a "headless" revolution for a while now, meaning way better APIs and metadata.

    There's A LOT of problems in the ecom world around product images, availavle inventory, and metadata accuracy, but it's definitely worth exploring.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Love the idea in concept. One major issue is the shipping. A major benefit of Amazon is just being able to add 20 things to your cart and get them all in like 1-2 boxes. In this hypothetical scenario, you'd presumably still have to handle checkout through each individual store, and if you ordered 20 things, you'd be placing up to 20 individual orders, each with their own shipping costs.

    This becomes more problematic when maybe multiple stores you're buying from sell multiple things on your list... ideal case would be to buy as many things from one store as possible, to consolidate shipping, but what if their prices for the individual items vary? Now you've got to search each individual storefront for each item and calculate the difference in cost. (This store sells item A for $2 cheaper but shipping is $3.50, is there another item I can add in to save shipping? They sell item B for $0.50 more, but I might save on shipping costs...)

    Technically this is no worse than it is now if you're shopping from a variety of stores rather than one megastore, but it would be a large barrier to adoption if you're trying to capture some of the "fed up with Amazon but still like the convenience" crowd.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    We have this in Czechia. Search engines that aggregate many small web shops together into a single search. Then you can go to whichever shop has the best deal or whatever. It's what we use locally instead of Amazon, and I always feel much better giving my money directly to the small specialty shops. It's not technically federated I guess but it achieves the same thing.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    This is basically eBay.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Requires a fully funded and staffed public postal service in a county that's dismantling, privatizing, and outsourcing core components of public sector package shipping

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Not quite what you want but Flohmarkt (flea market in German) is federated. https://codeberg.org/flohmarkt/flohmarkt

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    The biggest problem I see is that retailers generally don't want to increase visibility for their competition. Competition usually lowers prices, good for consumers, but business is not a fan. Even in non competing markets, consumers only have a limited amount of money. That $50 you spent on clothes is $50 not spent on power tools. The main reason some sell on markets like eBay/amazon/etc is because they're so large and centralized that you can't really avoid them.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Amazon is more “warehousing and fulfillment” than it is “storefront”.

    This would be hard to replicate without immense capital.

  • We have this in Czechia. Search engines that aggregate many small web shops together into a single search. Then you can go to whichever shop has the best deal or whatever. It's what we use locally instead of Amazon, and I always feel much better giving my money directly to the small specialty shops. It's not technically federated I guess but it achieves the same thing.

    We had this in Greece and it was great. Then you could order through the aggregator itself. Then it got its own delivery service that shops could use (still better than all other delivery companies). Then shops were added that don't have their own site nor a physical shop. Now it's trying to expand to other countries and there is a subscription that gives you lower delivery fees. It's still good and most people buy stuff from there but it's clear it's trying to become Amazon and I'm afraid most similar centralized services will go this way sooner or later.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    I mean, I buy stuff off eBay a lot, and it's often from small mom-and-pop shops. I needed new ribbon for my typewriter recently and ended up getting it from a store that just sells ink ribbons. They have an off-eBay presence too.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    A Search and streamlined payment program would be neat, but customer support and other things would have to be the responsibility of each store, so at minimum you'd have to gather stuff like contact info and return policies in a standardized way to show users

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    I love this idea!

  • We had this in Greece and it was great. Then you could order through the aggregator itself. Then it got its own delivery service that shops could use (still better than all other delivery companies). Then shops were added that don't have their own site nor a physical shop. Now it's trying to expand to other countries and there is a subscription that gives you lower delivery fees. It's still good and most people buy stuff from there but it's clear it's trying to become Amazon and I'm afraid most similar centralized services will go this way sooner or later.

    This is kinda the same process amazon itself went through back in the day

  • Love the idea in concept. One major issue is the shipping. A major benefit of Amazon is just being able to add 20 things to your cart and get them all in like 1-2 boxes. In this hypothetical scenario, you'd presumably still have to handle checkout through each individual store, and if you ordered 20 things, you'd be placing up to 20 individual orders, each with their own shipping costs.

    This becomes more problematic when maybe multiple stores you're buying from sell multiple things on your list... ideal case would be to buy as many things from one store as possible, to consolidate shipping, but what if their prices for the individual items vary? Now you've got to search each individual storefront for each item and calculate the difference in cost. (This store sells item A for $2 cheaper but shipping is $3.50, is there another item I can add in to save shipping? They sell item B for $0.50 more, but I might save on shipping costs...)

    Technically this is no worse than it is now if you're shopping from a variety of stores rather than one megastore, but it would be a large barrier to adoption if you're trying to capture some of the "fed up with Amazon but still like the convenience" crowd.

    A major benefit of Amazon is just being able to add 20 things to your cart and get them all in like 1-2 boxes.

    If this has worked for you in the last 5 years, your Amazon experience has been very different than mine.

    It was wonderful, when they did that.

  • A major benefit of Amazon is just being able to add 20 things to your cart and get them all in like 1-2 boxes.

    If this has worked for you in the last 5 years, your Amazon experience has been very different than mine.

    It was wonderful, when they did that.

    I had a horrible Amazon experience 3 or 4 years ago and haven't shopped there since, so I'm probably remembering the time when it did work.

  • Not quite what you want but Flohmarkt (flea market in German) is federated. https://codeberg.org/flohmarkt/flohmarkt

    Are there any instances of this? It looks promising

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    Amazon is local independt shops too, and better shipping, I just wouldnt do that to myself when amazon exists and ik I can get returns + fast shipping, you need buyers, more than a few altruistic ppl

  • We have this in Czechia. Search engines that aggregate many small web shops together into a single search. Then you can go to whichever shop has the best deal or whatever. It's what we use locally instead of Amazon, and I always feel much better giving my money directly to the small specialty shops. It's not technically federated I guess but it achieves the same thing.

    Like the other comments said, it's prob on it's way to becoming it's own amazon like figure there, thats how they start out

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40697282

    This is mostly just word-vomit, but I had a random idea while doing a tonne of Xmas shopping and figured you guys might appreciate possibly chewing on it.

    What if there potentially was a Fediverse-style alternative / competitor to Amazon Prime, etc. but instead of being one giant marketplace (a la Flohmarkt, etc.), it was made up of independent websites that federate together?


    Think something architecturally similar to Lemmy, Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed, Loops by Pixelfed, etc, but:

    No “instances” in the traditional sense (like Lemmy servers, Mastodon, instances, etc.)

    Instead, each shop is its own fully independent website

    (e.g.

    Gotyka,

    Dolls Kill,

    Dracula Clothing,

    VampireFreaks,

    Killstar,

    Hot Topic,

    Barnes and Noble,

    Home Depot,

    Everlane,

    Kotn,

    Pact,

    American Giant,

    Taylor Stitch,

    Outerknown,

    plus other shops for books, electronics, home goods, etc.)


    The federated layer wouldn’t replace their storefronts. It would just:

    Aggregate listings / catalogs

    Allow discovery, search, wishlists, maybe reviews

    Potentially handle things like recommendations without centralizing power

    Function kind of like a decentralized “market index” rather than a single store

    In other words:
    a protocol + shared infrastructure, not a mega-store.


    Some half-baked thoughts:

    Users might sign in via each individual shop (or perhaps via a shared fediverse identity like ActivityPub / OAuth / something new)

    Each store keeps control of branding, stock, payments, policies

    The “platform” just connects them into one large, searchable, decentralized marketplace

    No single Amazon-style choke point that can enshittify everything


    I love this idea in theory, but realistically:

    I don’t have the skills, knowledge, or time to build anything like this

    I also don’t know if this already exists in some form (OpenBazaar vibes? Solid? Something ActivityPub-adjacent?)

    This is more of a conceptual “what if” than a proposal


    But the idea stuck with me because:

    I hate how centralized Amazon is

    I like how the Fediverse decentralizes control

    And holiday shopping really highlights how fragmented yet monopolized online commerce has become


    So I’m mostly curious:

    Is this technically feasible with existing Fediverse tech?

    Has something like this already been attempted?

    What would be the biggest blockers — payments, trust, logistics, identity, incentives?

    Would independent shops even want this, or would it be more attractive to smaller creators?

    Is there a protocol or project adjacent to this idea?


    This idea honestly came from Xmas shopping fatigue and bouncing between a million tabs, wishing there was a non-Amazon way to do “one stop shopping” without recreating Amazon itself.

    Curious to hear thoughts, critiques, or “this already exists and you reinvented the wheel” responses.


    Also, feel more than welcome to steal the idea.

    I think this is a good idea


Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
  • Sounds like Rakuten actually...

    read more

  • This is kind of how it works in countries that haven’t been infected by Amazon Prime. In Sweden for example most e-commerce is done directly from individual stores. There are aggregation sites like prisjakt which lists prices of all different stores so you can find the best deal.

    It’s not perfect and maybe not as convenient as Amazon Prime, but I don’t see how a fediverse alternative could do it better.

    read more

  • Try shopping on Discogs or EBay. They both can handle a single cart with multiple vendor items shipping from different places.

    read more

  • read more

  • The main reason for a store to sign up on a website would be:

    Advertising Centralised shipping Centralised handling of payments (and note, this one is especially hard due to laws surrounding KYC and complexities in handling different payment methods)

    The Fediverse, being decentralised, has a hard time implementing the latter two. The first is basically not much different than being discoverable on Google.

    So fun as it sounds, it won't be easy to implement. You'd likely have to have independent "shippers" and PSPs sign up to this, and somehow have webshops choose which to use. And that's a very awkward structure for a Fediverse-minded solution.

    read more

  • There are actually 2. One is being more blatant about this and enshittifying in its attempt to be more like Amazon and hide the sellers. The other one is trying ads/subscription. I use the second.

    read more

  • In the near-term, a better idea might be to establish an alternative under a co-op model, like Subvert is trying to do for music as a Bandcamp successor. Vendors are part-owners of the entity and have input into its governance. Any code should be open source, too. Federation would be great to later help turn it into a truly resilient global platform.

    read more

  • I think this is a good idea

    read more
Post suggeriti
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    13 Views
    Right on the heels of WordPress 6.9 we released a new version of the ActivityPub plugin, making quote comments visible in the Reactions block and bringing you new ways of customizing your author pages.Quotes Join the Reactions PartyWhen someone quotes your post on Mastodon or other Fediverse platforms, you’ll now see it right alongside your likes and reposts. Quotes get their own row in the Fediverse Reactions display, making it easy to see at a glance who’s building on your ideas and adding their own commentary.Behind the scenes, we improved how we’re detecting quotes. Different platforms have their own ways of handling quote posts, and not all of them speak the same language. The plugin now understands these variations better, so whether someone quotes you from Mastodon, Misskey, or elsewhere, it just works.This means your engagement stats tell a fuller story. A quote isn’t just a repost—it’s someone adding their voice to yours, and now WordPress can recognize and display that distinction.Show Off Your Fediverse IdentityIf you’ve set up extra fields on your Fediverse profile—things like your website, pronouns, location, or links to other accounts—you can now display them directly on your WordPress site with the new Extra Fields block.Drop it onto any page, post, or your author archive template, pick a style that fits your theme, and your profile details appear right where your visitors can see them. Choose from a clean table layout, a stacked list, or styled cards. You can also control how many fields to show and customize colors to match your site.ChangelogAddedAdd documentation guide for using ActivityPub blocks in classic themes with Block Template PartsAdded a new Fediverse Extra Fields block to display ActivityPub extra fields, featuring compact, stacked, and card layouts with flexible user selection options.Added support for quote comments, improving detection and handling of quoted replies and links in post interactions.Add notifications for boosts, likes, and new followers in Mastodon apps via the Enable Mastodon Apps pluginAdds support for turning tags, categories, and custom taxonomies into federated collections in the Reader view so you can browse and follow topics more seamlessly.Prevent email notifications for comments on ActivityPub custom post types.Send a Reject activity when a quote comment is deleted, revoking previous quote permissions and ensuring consistent inbox handling.Store and retrieve webfinger acct for remote actors to improve identification and reduce lookupsChangedImprove gallery and image block markup for ap_posts with better alt text and optimized layouts.Improve support for media attachments by handling Audio, Document, and Video object types in addition to Images.Maintain consistent return values in Create handler.Remove trailing hashtags from incoming posts to prevent duplication with taxonomy tags.Store comments and reactions from followed actors on reader posts, and keep them separate from your site’s comments in wp-admin.Update compatibility testing for PHP 8.5 and WordPress 6.9Use tag name instead of slug for hashtag display.FixedAlways includes id, first, and last links in collection responses, ensuring followers and following lists display correctly in Mastodon.Automatically approves reactions on ActivityPub posts in the Reader view for a smoother, more seamless interaction experience.Deliver public activities to followers only.Disable REST API endpoints for internal post types.False mention email notifications for users in CC field without actual mention tags.Fix “Filename too long” errors when downloading attachments from URLs with query parameters (e.g., Instagram CDN URLs).Fix make_clickable corrupting existing anchor tags in ActivityPub contentFix PHP 8.5 deprecation warnings for ReflectionProperty::setAccessible() and ReflectionMethod::setAccessible()Improved handling of unusual activity data to avoid errors when activities contain unexpected formats.Preserve original ActivityPub activity timestamps when creating posts and comments instead of using current time.Prevented duplicate email notifications when ActivityPub instances re-send Follow activities for already-following actors.Prevents unwanted comment types—like pingbacks, trackbacks, notes and custom system comments, from being federated, ensuring only real user comments are shared with the fediverse.Removed a redundant instruction from the custom post content settings to simplify the UI.Reply block now shows fallback link when oEmbed fails instead of empty div.Simplified reply links by removing special handling for federated comments, making replies work the same for all comments where replying is allowed.Undefined array key warning in Scheduler::async_batch when called without arguments.DownloadsWordPress.org: activitypub.7.7.0.zipGitHub: tag/7.7.0Thank You!As always, a huge thanks to everyone who contributed code, reported bugs, tested early builds, and shared ideas. Every bit of feedback helps make ActivityPub for WordPress better for the whole community.Version 7.7.0 is available now—update and let us know what you think!
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    8 Views
    @Edent those are interesting numbers. Thank you for sharing them!
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    18 Views
    One of my favourite features of the #fediverse is seeing people *learning things*. There are so many folks here discovering dying arts and trades. People learning how the things we take for granted work, and endeavouring to implement them themselves!People getting their #HAMradio licenses, #selfhosting, making clothing, blacksmithing, gardening, repairing their own things, backporting modern software to run on windows 3.11... Y'all are my people. Never stop learning, and never stop sharing what you've learned.
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    15 Views
    Since the influx of Blue Sky and Twitter users, Mastodon Dot Social had unfortunately — but temporarily — experienced a few Nazi accounts, all of which have since been removed. However, a few individuals are now wrongfully claiming that the Fediverse is no different, simply because a few bad individuals managed to make it here. What they’re choosing to ignore is the key difference: those accounts were dealt with and rightfully removed. The fact that they weren’t caught immediately does not support the implications being made. 🙄Haters are going to hate. 🤷#Fediverse #ActivityPub #Mastodon #BlueSky #Twitter #Nazis