Mozilla's survey about the future of Mozilla and AI is terribly biased towards AI.

[dalias@hachyderm.io]

@chillybot "Holding corporations accountable for their AI products" is really the only good option to that question which doesn't admit much twisting. It's what I'd recommend selecting.

[petesmom@kolektiva.social]

@chillybot
There is a narrative answer box if you skip to the bottom where you can just tell them: WOW! Award winning biased survey and also do not want AI polluting tech tooks I use and if you try to force AI on people no worries, someone will fill the void you leave while you die on the vine with the other douchebags.

[xyla@transfem.social]

@mttaggart@infosec.exchange @chillybot@infosec.exchange @DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange the thing is, this is their replacement for the revenue they lost due to the google antitrust lawsuit.
instead of a search/ad engine paying them, AI Companies will do so now.

[mttaggart@infosec.exchange]

@Xyla @chillybot @DaveMWilburn That's not entirely accurate, as the remedies for that case did not prevent sweetheart deals like the one Moz has with Google for default placement.

[the_turtle@mastodon.sdf.org]

@chillybot action taken.

I don't think I used the word "motherfuckers" enough, though.

[xyla@transfem.social]

@chillybot@infosec.exchange @DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange @mttaggart@infosec.exchange it didn’t but it did result in a loss of funding due to the scrutiny.

as such Mozilla has been looking at other sources of income and the AI industry is throwing it around right now.

[jbriancoyle@mas.to]

@chillybot
Hope they read the server logs & see my survey was submitted using @Vivaldi 🤭🤫

[longspeak@chirp.enworld.org]

@chillybot And then they ask for a donation.

[scottwilson@infosec.exchange]

@chillybot I absolutely made the most of those “Other” and free text fields to put Mozilla on blast RE: #AI

[unchartedworlds@scicomm.xyz]

@mttaggart

Thanks for this!

About the line "So of these organizations, 3 of them need to have flagship AI products by 2028."

It looks to me like that might be accidentally smushing together 2 different aims,

"All Mozilla orgs have a flagship AI product by 2028"
and
"3 Mozilla orgs have more than $25M in revenue (currently: 1)"

Or am I wrong?

[mttaggart@infosec.exchange]

@unchartedworlds MZLA is excluded from the requirement, I believe

[jackemled@furry.engineer]

@chillybot My answers to the survey were basically "Want my data for your AI? Fuck you, pay me."

[raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie]

@chillybot
I can't in honesty fill in such an absolutely broken survey!
It's got missing important questions.

They have totally lost the plot.

[wyatt@soc.megatokyo.moe]

@chillybot it won't matter but here's how i filled it out

[crazyeddie@mastodon.social]

@chillybot Done. Noted in the commentary that very little of the survey was about developing a web browser and that we need a team that is focused on making a good web browser.

[crazyeddie@mastodon.social]

@dalias @chillybot It's not a radio group. You can leave that section blank. The survey does post if you decide none of the responses are valid.

[aimeemaroux@mastodon.social]

@chillybot I took the survey and told them I want absolutely no AI anywhere near Mozilla. Thanks for sharing!

[nyquildotorg@gts.nyquil.org]

@chillybot FYI to others: don't fall for the "choose three" thing; you can submit with just "other" selected.

[jguillaumes@mastodont.cat]

@chillybot my response to the final text box:

‘No AI at all. That technology is toxic and there is no way to use it ethically’

[luluhelle@ohai.social]

@chillybot i refused to answer the important things in AI question. Hopefully that doesn't invalidate my survey