This post makes a good point on naming software systems and libraries.
Uncategorized
3
Posts
2
Posters
12
Views
-
This post makes a good point on naming software systems and libraries. However, in a rich ecosystem the namespace of descriptive names may quickly fill up.
-
This post makes a good point on naming software systems and libraries. However, in a rich ecosystem the namespace of descriptive names may quickly fill up.
@amoroso This was my major issue when starting with Smalltalk a few years ago: weird package names. Metacello for package management. Iceberg for version control.
-
@amoroso This was my major issue when starting with Smalltalk a few years ago: weird package names. Metacello for package management. Iceberg for version control.
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
That's kind of you to say, @evan . I'm still somewhat concerned people will think I'm spamming the timeline.
@pluralistic does it and people don't mind; but I'm not the same kind of writer.
Really, this ought to be a blog post, not a thread; I should really reactivate my blog.
-
Vi ho mai mostrato il porta PC portatile da parete che feci qualche anno fa? Stasera ho smontato tutto per sfilare e ripulire la PS4 accanto.
Quello bianco è un pannello in PVC di recupero dalla galvanica, lo buttavano via, poi c'è un profilo ad angolo in alluminio e pellicola lucida effetto carbonio del negozio di cinesi.
Si nota la presa d'aria che ho fatto di sotto verso il centro?
-
@mpjgregoire this is a great thread. Thank you!
-
@mcc@mastodon.social absolutely — they just look nicer that way.
-
That said, about 13% of delegates voted non-confidence, so support is
not unanimous. I ran into delegates who lamented that people they knew who'd
always supported the Conservatives wouldn't vote for the party with
Mr. Poilievre as leader.12/12
-
5. Pierre Poilievre. Members of the CPC like him personally, like where he
stands on issues, like the way he's a fighter, like the way he's brought new
support into the party. I ran into one guy who said that he'd be another
Robert Stanfield, someone who'd be an excellent PM but who would never win.
But I didn't run into anyone who'd admit to opposing Mr. Poilievre; there was
no one organising against him; there were not even anti-Poilievre buttons
around.11/n
-
I did bring up Pres. Trump a few times,
and when I did so, the response I received was that he was doing crazy things
and that he was bad for our electoral chances. But people weren't really
talking about Pres. Trump one way or another, so I can't claim to know that
that was the general feeling.10/n
-
4. Trumpiness. The party struck me as essentially the same as it was twenty-five
years ago: same sort of spirit, same sort of issues, even many of the same
individuals (I ran into people who fought in the Clark-Mulroney struggle). I
have to say that there wasn't much discussion of Canada-US issues; mostly I
talked about domestic policy (the CBC! Zoning!) or current regional/national
politics (John Rustad was terrible!).9/n
