Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

Ovviamente scrivere qualcosa sui sociale non è un obbligo, anzi.

Uncategorized
3 2 0

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
  • @inherentlee I believe one would only need one o-ring, a touch of silicone grease, and a ton of liquid absorbent material to safely carry it around in case the plastic breaks, right? :D
    read more

  • @dvl @aaron

    it's just an old ipv4 silliness about number choices from earlier in my career, and loosely associated with my acquisition of too many rfc1918.$TLD domains.

    Perhaps others do this too... I have a tendency to dis-prefer odd numbers (they're surely the devil's work, like left-handed people lol jk) and to prefer numbers in base 4 (who doesn't?). with that in mind, what are 192 and 254 but de-constructible objects of fun within the limits of v4 quad-notation?

    ```
    192 == 64 x 3 == sixty-four PRIMEs, lovely
    64 == winrar of numbers, obviously
    64 == 16 x 4 == four is best-base, what could be better than four of fours?
    64 == 4x4x4 == the best number cubed, lovely.

    254 == last addressable IP in a v4 (255 is a downward tangent, we won't go there now)
    254 / 64 = 3.96 (evil, clearly)
    254 / 4 = 63.5 (almost decent yet part of the curse)
    254 / 2 = 127 (everyone knows where home begins)
    ```

    ---

    rfc1918.hosts = baremetal hosts
    rfc1918.dev = dev systems
    rfc1918.io = storage protocol scopes (iscsi, fcoe, roce, ib)
    rfc1918.ai = GPU/ML compute VMs
    rfc1918.systems = embedded systems
    rfc1918.${others}

    there are several additional ones that I use for other roles, and while I could use subdomains to sort ... I also already use subdomains to sort. also, whoever owns rfc1918.net needs to sell it to me. :D

    read more

  • Lughino

    read more

  • @vonblubba in che senso sbagliato? ne hai fatti troppo pochi? :D
    read more

  • @Tiberio sì, ma parlare di pensiero alternativo può essere fuorviante. Oggi una parte consistente del cosiddetto "pensiero alternativo" è solo un coacervo di patetica propaganda, solo un po' più sfigata.

    Il mainstream infatti non è falso per definizione e il "pensiero dominante" non è falso a prescindere.

    Chi si vuole accreditare come attendibile solo perché si oppone al pensiero dominante o è un ingenuo o un manipolatore.

    @lastknight

    read more

  • @zako uhm...here it worked immediately, after installation. But it's an old installation (May) so I don't know if something has changed since then.

    read more

  • @valhalla PREPPYS as eyedroppers???? omg! I would never 😰

    read more

  • postate cosa avete mangiato oggi...dopo!

    read more
Post suggeriti