Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

Journalismus jenseits von Big Tech: unser Report ist da!

Fediverso
10 6 16

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
  • @jonny@neuromatch.social honestly good for you for investing the time to critique this knowing it's AI (adjacent or wholesale) involvement.

    read more

  • @julian @PortaFed
    giving a further read: I can't really imagine a case where someone would a) regularly be creating signed backups and also b) know in advance where you wanted to migrate to to set the destination_did. Like if this is for the case where the instance has shut down, you might have some signed backup, but you probably haven't planned in advance where you would want to migrate, and if the instance is down you wouldn't be able to create the migration object after the fact.

    the validation strategy for the export is sort of mystifying to me. if the whole object is signed, then why would you need a merkle tree for objects and also an object count? if the contents of the object have changed post signing, then the signature validation will just fail and those are irrelevant.

    true to form for LLM generated documents, several critical things are left undefined, like what last_accepted_sequence is or how that works.

    probably the most important problem is that it's not really clear how all other instances are supposed to handle this, which is the entire hard part of a migration spec. Like, if the purpose here is to preserve identity, then you would need to have all the other instances come to see the new identity as being equivalent to the old identity, and there's no discussion of how that process works for third-party instances at all. like e.g. in FEP-1580 i had to spend a long time gaming out scenarios for how third party instances would handle a move event.

    so without that it's not really an account portabiltiy spec, it's an account export/import spec, which is fine, just not really needed since signing objects and collections (which this spec should use anyway) is already described by other specs.

    read more

  • @silverpillThank you , these are important corrections and I appreciate you taking the time.
    You're right on both points. I'll update the spec to reflect that FEP-ef61 authority is not actor-rooted in the way I described, and that migration is possible via outbox export-import. I was overstating the gap.
    The distinction I was trying to draw is narrower:

    read more

  • @PortaFed

    I have a couple of comments regarding the spec https://codeberg.org/portafed/portafed/src/branch/main/portafed-spec/spec.md

    It contains a comparison with FEP-ef61, but it is not quite correct:

    - FEP-ef61 identity is not actor-rooted. The closest equivalent of FEP-ef61 identity in normal ActivityPub is a server with a domain name. A single FEP-ef61 authority can manage multiple actor documents.
    - FEP-ef61 does not lack a migration flow. Strictly speaking, it doesn't need one, because data is not attached to a server and can be continuously synchronized between multiple servers. But a more familiar migration flow is also possible via outbox export-import.

    @lutindiscret

    read more

  • @benpate That would be great and happy to contribute wherever it fits.
    My guess on the scope decision is the same as yours: hostile-server recovery is genuinely harder, and a cooperative spec is already a lot to get right. Makes sense to tackle it separately.
    Take your time reading. I'll put together a short write-up of how MigrationProof could slot into the existing spec easier to react to something concrete than to an abstract pitch.

    read more

  • @jonny@neuromatch.social tracks doesn't it 😝

    read more

  • @julian
    @evan @benpate @PortaFed
    Can't make heads or tails of this one

    read more

  • Warm up the fire! We're LIVE!

    Summer in Winter: Norcal Gma 2's Journey with her Dog - E79

    #owncast #streaming #interview #fediverse #fedi #people #show #firesidefedi #FsF

    https://stream.firesidefedi.live

    read more
Post suggeriti
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3 Views
    ICYMI, @fediforum's Growing the Open Social Web unworkshop took place today. Catch up on everything that happened via @tchambers's FediForum Surf feed.https://surf.social/feed/surf%2Fcustom%2F01jvprse7ptd6b9gccy3m9g547#FediForum #OpenSocial #SocialWeb #Fediverse #ActivityPub #SurfFeeds
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    12 Views
    And FULL peek on our research atNOAW unconference — CfP! Submit a topic! Get aboard!"Nodes on a Web: The Fediverse in/for Public Institutions”Thu/Fri 19/20 March 2026, Amsterdam!https://www.fedivariety.org/unconference#jugglingthefediverse #noaw #fediverse #event #unconference #fedi #fediforum #socialweb #opensocialweb #fossevent #OpenSocialWebSociety #publicspaces #activitypub #publicInstitutions #cfp #callforparticipation #research #activism #ccc #amsterdam
  • Big tech equals big crap

    Fediverso fediverse
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    11 Views
    Big tech equals big crapI am happy on the #Fediverse running on free open source software with no billionaire in sight
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    6 Views
    Guest?
    EDIT - informationThis tutorial is supposed to be published by the tutorial profile of this server.It is designed to have several chapters, each being distinctively seperated by an own titel. In total as of now there are like besides this introduction like 6 chapters.posting and edition time of and by this EDIT profileof ver05 as of now 1hsmastodon review contact: @bitpickup--Categories:@helpers@forum.friendi.ca SPOILER - click to open/close || IntroductionThis tutorial is an adaption of the tutorial "creating a friendica server - ubuntu" by @hankg based on the experience of the installation report by @jesuisatirebitpickup:squeet.me/display/962c3e10-576…and specific help by @raroun.Server specs and friendica version used:VPS server | Ubuntu 22.04 LTSPHP Version 8.1.2-1ubuntu2.144 Core CPU, 8 GB Ram with 300GB NVME DiskFriendica [STABLE] | 'Giant Rhubarb' 2023.05 - 1518SPOILER - click to open/close || Installation environment and HowToThe only reasonable way to work with a VPSserver on the web is using the console.If you are not familiar with that don't worry, it is easy and the only thing you have to do is being able to copy/paste the commands displayed:¡Copy/paste only the codeBoxes like this one, located outside of the spoilers of this tutorial one after another without altering the sequence!Of course it is necessary to change the specific file names and passwords for you indiviual site, but that's all. promise!On the console you wont be able to copy/paste with the keyboard ctrl-C/ctrl-V technique, you'll have to use the mouse "right click, chose option" technique.This tutorial was created on a #debian #linux desktop environment.There shouldn't be differences if you want to do this from a #windows machine.The method used for communication between your local computer and the VPS server is called #SSH:Wikipedia - Secure Shell:"Cryptographic network protocol for secure data communication, remote shell services or command execution and other secure network services between two networked computers."#linux #debian #ubuntu #friendica #fediVerse #fediTutorial #tutorial #fediHelp #fediTips #activityPub #HowTo #DIY #VPS #server #selfHosting@admin@tupambae.org @tutorial@tupambae.org