I think "there won't be an election in November" is naive.
-
I think "there won't be an election in November" is naive.
There will be an election, it will be operated in conjuction with ICE, and thus only a select few people will vote.
There is no need to do the kind of spectacular destructions of constitutional legalism that some of y'all imagine. Things will occur much like they have: plausibly acceptable up until you decide they aren't.
-
I think "there won't be an election in November" is naive.
There will be an election, it will be operated in conjuction with ICE, and thus only a select few people will vote.
There is no need to do the kind of spectacular destructions of constitutional legalism that some of y'all imagine. Things will occur much like they have: plausibly acceptable up until you decide they aren't.
Like I'm not going to dig up sources for folk who probably would benefit from the exercise themselves, but all the right judges have been put in place, all the right rulings, for this election, like every other election in my lifetime, to be totally legitimate by every currently applicable rule.
I really don't get how some of y'all don't get that yet.
-
I think "there won't be an election in November" is naive.
There will be an election, it will be operated in conjuction with ICE, and thus only a select few people will vote.
There is no need to do the kind of spectacular destructions of constitutional legalism that some of y'all imagine. Things will occur much like they have: plausibly acceptable up until you decide they aren't.
there are elections in russia, putin alwsys gets 95% of votes ...
-
there are elections in russia, putin alwsys gets 95% of votes ...
@dibi58 @emsenn That's not much of a mandate. Saddam Hussein got 99.96% and a perfect 100% in Iraq.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1995_Iraqi_presidential_referendum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Iraqi_presidential_referendum
-
I think "there won't be an election in November" is naive.
There will be an election, it will be operated in conjuction with ICE, and thus only a select few people will vote.
There is no need to do the kind of spectacular destructions of constitutional legalism that some of y'all imagine. Things will occur much like they have: plausibly acceptable up until you decide they aren't.
@emsenn 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 finally. Someone gets it.
That goes for everything. Not just 'elections' or whatever we'll get.
-
I think "there won't be an election in November" is naive.
There will be an election, it will be operated in conjuction with ICE, and thus only a select few people will vote.
There is no need to do the kind of spectacular destructions of constitutional legalism that some of y'all imagine. Things will occur much like they have: plausibly acceptable up until you decide they aren't.
@emsenn
It’s not who votes that counts, it’s who counts the votes. -
I think "there won't be an election in November" is naive.
There will be an election, it will be operated in conjuction with ICE, and thus only a select few people will vote.
There is no need to do the kind of spectacular destructions of constitutional legalism that some of y'all imagine. Things will occur much like they have: plausibly acceptable up until you decide they aren't.
@emsenn
They still hold elections in Russia. "Fair and free."
Even N. Korea had elections.
They won't abolish elections, that was just a wet dream by Donnie.
I'm not an American, but you guys need to create a blue wave like nothing else before, this November. If you don't, future elections will not matter anymore. -
undefined quinta@mastodon.uno shared this topic