Creating fake, sexual images of women and children is a cruel and unacceptable form of abuse.
Uncategorized
32
Posts
25
Posters
118
Views
-
We have also extended our on-going investigation on X, to evaluate whether X diligently assessed and mitigated all systemic risks associated with its recommender systems.
🔗 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_26_203
@HennaVirkkunen this will only be meaningful if every politician, political party, and Governmental Department move off Twitter/X to a European owned and hosted solution. The tacit support of using the platform for official channels has to stop.
-
Creating fake, sexual images of women and children is a cruel and unacceptable form of abuse. We will not accept that.
Today, the European Commission has launched new investigation against X under the DSA. We have taken investigative steps and suspect that X has not properly assessed and mitigated risk on Grok´s functionalities. This includes the risk of spreading illegal content in the EU, like fake sexual images and child abuse material.
@HennaVirkkunen And all the 🇪🇺 goverment and voted members will stop using X and go into the Fediverse
-
Creating fake, sexual images of women and children is a cruel and unacceptable form of abuse. We will not accept that.
Today, the European Commission has launched new investigation against X under the DSA. We have taken investigative steps and suspect that X has not properly assessed and mitigated risk on Grok´s functionalities. This includes the risk of spreading illegal content in the EU, like fake sexual images and child abuse material.
@HennaVirkkunen And yet you are accepting it.
Everyone involved in senior positions in the EU really need to delete your Twitter accounts immediately if you want to be taken seriously when you claim such things are unacceptable.
-
Creating fake, sexual images of women and children is a cruel and unacceptable form of abuse. We will not accept that.
Today, the European Commission has launched new investigation against X under the DSA. We have taken investigative steps and suspect that X has not properly assessed and mitigated risk on Grok´s functionalities. This includes the risk of spreading illegal content in the EU, like fake sexual images and child abuse material.
@HennaVirkkunen it’s absurd that any company still exists/advertises on twitter
-
Creating fake, sexual images of women and children is a cruel and unacceptable form of abuse. We will not accept that.
Today, the European Commission has launched new investigation against X under the DSA. We have taken investigative steps and suspect that X has not properly assessed and mitigated risk on Grok´s functionalities. This includes the risk of spreading illegal content in the EU, like fake sexual images and child abuse material.
But creating fake, sexual images of men and elderly is an acceptable from of abuse then?
-
@HennaVirkkunen I strongly welcome this decision. As I find this issue very pressing, i would like to know:
1. When will you make a decision about interim measures? I find it unacceptable to have this kind a crime committed and could imagine a temporary ban of the delinquent service beeing a great measure to mitigate harm done to the eu and its citizens.
2. when will there be a decision about non-compliance ? The investigation has been going on for over 2 years now and fines do not seem to help.Agreed and adding the following:
3—How many people are on the cases? It appears the EU is by no means interested to swiftly and effectively deal with the number of DSA violations.
4—The embarrassingly low amounts of fines the EU has exercised so far is an act of cowardice.
5—The Commission pushing forcefully for our mass surveillance + sucking up to the fascistic Trump terror regime + the enemies of European democracy from the Silicon Valley is unacceptable. -
We have also extended our on-going investigation on X, to evaluate whether X diligently assessed and mitigated all systemic risks associated with its recommender systems.
🔗 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_26_203
@HennaVirkkunen What I'm about to say/ask probably it's beyond your capabilities, nevertheless, please also try this: Get politicians to move here ( Mastodon) journalists will follow. @leavex is a remarkable example of awareness and brilliant strategy.
cc/ @leanderlindahl
-
undefined 77nn@goto.77nn.it shared this topic on
-
If they break the law. Ban.
If they are right-wing echo-chamber, sadly that's not enough. Banning them on this basis would be censorship.
@jarekrozanski @HennaVirkkunen some years ago, I would have agreed your opinion. But there is no level playing field dealing with dangerous Maniacs as Musky when they weaponize their Platforms ind the mind of MAGA against EU. But maybe you have some better ideas to fight back and protect our values?
-
@HennaVirkkunen Great step... BUT... We should also stop lending any hint of legitimacy to X by having governments and official bodies communicate using this platform. Also given current events it's the prudent move to improve European digital sovereignty.
We don't need to ban it. Just leave.
@rraggl @HennaVirkkunen it really is that easy.
So easy.
-
What I don't understand: why does the Europan Commission still have an Account on X? You are supporting a criminal who Funds and Supports AI generated child abuse.
The EC should delete all it's posts and leave a note how to find it's fediverse Account.
my2ct
@strigga_ @HennaVirkkunen at the end of the day most people just don't care and go there because that's where the user base is. Its why I stream across multiple platforms including X unfortunately so until the userbase for my audience leaves (football club) I'm stuck on the platform.
-
Creating fake, sexual images of women and children is a cruel and unacceptable form of abuse. We will not accept that.
Today, the European Commission has launched new investigation against X under the DSA. We have taken investigative steps and suspect that X has not properly assessed and mitigated risk on Grok´s functionalities. This includes the risk of spreading illegal content in the EU, like fake sexual images and child abuse material.
@HennaVirkkunen Very credible person. Congrats.
-
@HennaVirkkunen Great. Good Job. But why so late? This is honest question. Why it took a MONTH.
@jarekrozanski @HennaVirkkunen The Commission is a huge bureaucracy tied up by complex procedures, not a handful of people in a room making decisions on a whim. They will want to produce a bunch of internal documents and build the case before they initiate anything formally, and they will want to do it right.
A month is not a long time in this context, it's blazingly fast.
-
undefined _elena@mastodon.social shared this topic on
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@etc @eniko thanks! That's definitely one. There was I think another still from her that involved attaching the vibrator to one of those tools that go into the lock, but that was definitely the first I saw.
-
@luca 👍🏻😄
-
-
@G3rt e chi mette in dubbio che il colonialismo abbia portato morte e distruzione? Anche le conquiste di Roma non sono state una passeggiata di salute, così come quelle dei khan o dei califfi. Io però non vivo al tempo della regina Vittoria e non parlo latino. Ciò che vedo oggi in Europa sono poche decine di staterelli litigiosi, economicamente, demograficamente e militarmente insignificanti, incapaci di imporre anche solo politicamente una qualsivoglia visione.
-
Mass extinctions events
-
@jwz Given the ridiculously stupid things happening in the world now, I had this sinking feeling that it would be for real. But after reading FloofyWolf's full post, I'm fairly certain it is satirical.
(See https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2026/03/msg00018.html )
For me #Linux is the last bastion of computing freedom, now that MS and Apple appear to have become largely just #enshittified marketing/surveillance/fee-charging engines. I can certainly imagine a future where Linux (of all flavors) is under all-out assault from the tech-bros.
-
@stefano_zan 😍😍😍😍😍😍😍
-
@jwz the fuck?
I've read the first few posts in the original Ubuntu thread.
Am I mad? Or are they?
In the first few everyone just ponders how to actually do the censoring.
None asked the obvious question: ARE YOU BARKING MAD?
