Mozilla's survey about the future of Mozilla and AI is terribly biased towards AI.
Uncategorized
42
Posts
30
Posters
91
Views
-
Mozilla's survey about the future of Mozilla and AI is terribly biased towards AI. Make your voices heard. Tell Mozilla to be stewards of privacy and the open web, to not use AI and to stop violating the trust of the users
-
Mozilla's survey about the future of Mozilla and AI is terribly biased towards AI. Make your voices heard. Tell Mozilla to be stewards of privacy and the open web, to not use AI and to stop violating the trust of the users
The questions are basically "how do you want AI to be used" without providing a real option to say "none of the above I don't want AI to exist in Firefox"
-
The questions are basically "how do you want AI to be used" without providing a real option to say "none of the above I don't want AI to exist in Firefox"
I mean there are freetext inputs so you can and should say that, it's just not multiple choice options.
-
The questions are basically "how do you want AI to be used" without providing a real option to say "none of the above I don't want AI to exist in Firefox"
@chillybot I resort to "Other (specify)" most of the time.
Yeah, low likelihood of being actually read, but eh.
-
The questions are basically "how do you want AI to be used" without providing a real option to say "none of the above I don't want AI to exist in Firefox"
@chillybot I think that's rather honest of them. They have no intention of backing off from AI. They'll ride that bomb all the way to the ground.
-
@chillybot I think that's rather honest of them. They have no intention of backing off from AI. They'll ride that bomb all the way to the ground.
@mttaggart
searches "how to stage an intervention for a large non profit" -
@chillybot I think that's rather honest of them. They have no intention of backing off from AI. They'll ride that bomb all the way to the ground.
It's incredible how obtuse they are about their own user base, and what motivates someone to choose Firefox to begin with. Anyone who likes this crap is already perfectly happy using Chrome or Edge.
-
@mttaggart
searches "how to stage an intervention for a large non profit" -
It's incredible how obtuse they are about their own user base, and what motivates someone to choose Firefox to begin with. Anyone who likes this crap is already perfectly happy using Chrome or Edge.
@DaveMWilburn @chillybot I have been following this for some time, and I think the answer is clearly that they don't think of Firefox as anything more than legacy debt, despite their language. Their investments are in AI because that's where donor money is. The user base is not the revenue source. Their corporations that chase VC are.
-
@mttaggart
searches "how to stage an intervention for a large non profit" -
Mozilla's survey about the future of Mozilla and AI is terribly biased towards AI. Make your voices heard. Tell Mozilla to be stewards of privacy and the open web, to not use AI and to stop violating the trust of the users
@chillybot Thanks. I responded asking them to oppose the genocidal and ecocidal military-industrial complex and invest in a community-led internet
-
@chillybot It's too late: https://taggart-tech.com/mozilla-cycle-pt3
@mttaggart
Fantastic read as always! I am still giggling over "Blavidia" xD -
The questions are basically "how do you want AI to be used" without providing a real option to say "none of the above I don't want AI to exist in Firefox"
@chillybot "Holding corporations accountable for their AI products" is really the only good option to that question which doesn't admit much twisting. It's what I'd recommend selecting.
-
Mozilla's survey about the future of Mozilla and AI is terribly biased towards AI. Make your voices heard. Tell Mozilla to be stewards of privacy and the open web, to not use AI and to stop violating the trust of the users
@chillybot
There is a narrative answer box if you skip to the bottom where you can just tell them: WOW! Award winning biased survey and also do not want AI polluting tech tooks I use and if you try to force AI on people no worries, someone will fill the void you leave while you die on the vine with the other douchebags. -
It's incredible how obtuse they are about their own user base, and what motivates someone to choose Firefox to begin with. Anyone who likes this crap is already perfectly happy using Chrome or Edge.
@mttaggart@infosec.exchange @chillybot@infosec.exchange @DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange the thing is, this is their replacement for the revenue they lost due to the google antitrust lawsuit.
instead of a search/ad engine paying them, AI Companies will do so now. -
@mttaggart@infosec.exchange @chillybot@infosec.exchange @DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange the thing is, this is their replacement for the revenue they lost due to the google antitrust lawsuit.
instead of a search/ad engine paying them, AI Companies will do so now.@Xyla @chillybot @DaveMWilburn That's not entirely accurate, as the remedies for that case did not prevent sweetheart deals like the one Moz has with Google for default placement.
-
Mozilla's survey about the future of Mozilla and AI is terribly biased towards AI. Make your voices heard. Tell Mozilla to be stewards of privacy and the open web, to not use AI and to stop violating the trust of the users
@chillybot action taken.
I don't think I used the word "motherfuckers" enough, though.
-
@Xyla @chillybot @DaveMWilburn That's not entirely accurate, as the remedies for that case did not prevent sweetheart deals like the one Moz has with Google for default placement.
@chillybot@infosec.exchange @DaveMWilburn@infosec.exchange @mttaggart@infosec.exchange it didn’t but it did result in a loss of funding due to the scrutiny.
as such Mozilla has been looking at other sources of income and the AI industry is throwing it around right now. -
Mozilla's survey about the future of Mozilla and AI is terribly biased towards AI. Make your voices heard. Tell Mozilla to be stewards of privacy and the open web, to not use AI and to stop violating the trust of the users
@chillybot
Hope they read the server logs & see my survey was submitted using @Vivaldi 🤭🤫
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
partita con un mare di errori ma fantastica vittoria dell'Italrugby!
È da trent'anni che aspettavamo di battere l'Inghilterra, era pure ora.
Or speriamo di battere pure il Galles alla prossima e stabilire un nuovo record di vittorie.
-
-
@aeva I believe it's a straight read? The shader in question is: https://gitlab.com/amini-allight/lambdamod/-/blob/master/src/shaders/lit_textured_fragment.glsl
-
@_elena I used to think like you until I saw this in Japan. Then I got jealous of the Japanese. 😉
-
@Godai71
Lo ricordo anch'io.
Ne parlarono tutti, era in copertina sulle riviste di cinema, qui ebbe successo e ne rimase traccia a lungo.
-
@grepe @_elena Yeah, it's probably the same plant doing stuff funny. I found quite a few in my grandparents' garden, and none anywhere else. Though I haven't been looking much lately.
-
@AminiAllight Anyway, to rule this out, sample both textures first, and only then select one of the read values based on whatever condition you have.
-
@AminiAllight Is this a whole mesh or is it two separate meshes? If it's the former and you're selecting the image in the shader, the following can happen: a pixel selects one image, but it's neighbour selects another, and they can't decide on the appropriate mipmap level (which is computed based on uv differences in neighbouring pixels). Though in that case I'd expect 2x2-pixel-sized artifacts, while yours seem to be in some larger pixel tiles.
