Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

Complete this sentence:

Fediverso
169 88 79

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
  • @johannab No, not at all snarky. 💕

    What is so interesting is to discern between the technical and social, and I think that most people have a very functional-technical perspective of what it means to communicate online, so to say. Consider it merely as extra channels to interact with others, more choice to connect.

    But of course our online social network is much more than merely a channel, and we have to 'project our social' somehow over these thin copper and fiberglass wires, while we try to make sense and interpret the social signals that come from other remote places.

    I think we underestimate the impact of communicating online, and the narrow 'social bandwidth' that our current networking tools support. Then we translate online situations to how we would behave offline and get wrong expectations, misconceptions, and subequenctly miscommunications.

    We are still all youngers online, still all learning the ropes, while we do social networking offline for 1,000's of years already.

    read more

  • @smallcircles

    Awesome!

    I hope my response didn't come off snarky, as that wasn't how I meant it - at worst I intended to be a bit pedantic. And relatable analogies are *always* at my fingertips when talking to the inexperienced or "non-tech" social network users, for sure.

    But *eventually* we need to draw people in to a little more media- and tech-literate understanding.

    I'm bookmarking your blog post, thanks - this is a topic in my current academic modules and my hoped-for masters capstone

    read more

  • @johannab

    What I particularly like in your definition, is that it makes clear that "fediverse" by itself indicates a pure technosphere. It enables social communication, and merely facilitates it. What people do on that channel, the way they communicate and how they interact with others then determines the social experience.

    SX starts to consider a social experience from the most personal perspective, where a person has individual needs wrt their online participation. Then using the "Pyramid of perspective" this scale up to consider inter-personal relationships, and at the top of the pyramid and at the largest scale we shape the constructs of society together.

    (Note that SX is a universal solution development methodology, even though it starts with a focus on social web and software development.)

    See also: https://coding.social/blog/reimagine-social/#pyramid-of-perspective

    read more

  • @johannab

    That is a good, more matter of fact characterization to all the analogies indeed. Thank you.

    read more

  • @smallcircles

    Other: loosely-bound meta-network of more tightly-bound community or topical networks.

    I *describe my experience* using all kinds of analogies such as the other options in this poll.

    read more

  • @Curry @theraccoonbytes I was thinking of privately reaching out to Casey and PJ first (Kevin has barely used the instance) to see what their plans are for the future...

    and then maybe try to assemble a group of volunteers to see if anyone is interested in helping out with hosting, moderation, onboarding, community engagement, etc.

    For now whenever I can I browse their local timeline and interact with people to make them feel seen and valued...

    read more

  • @draNgNon thanks, some very good food for thought.

    I think the crucial point is that we do not know and do not offer proper ways to deal with different modes of communication, esp. if the only medium channel constitutes a stream of sticky notes, such as we have here in this space.

    On the first point, when is something an vs. a healthy interest area, I think depends how well one is able to cross the 'membranes' of all the various social contexts and information spaces one navigates online, as it were.

    There should be a place for 'influencing' to an extent if only to reach your crowd and build community and such. But all in balance and proportion and clear social context preferably. Non-profits and groups want to influence, we may want to be informed.

    To the last point. There's urgency to address the dark world situation, and either organize or lose. defines as a way to engage in constructive ..

    https://social.coop/@smallcircles/116159361728695210

    read more

  • @theraccoonbytes @_elena Are there specific measures I can be taking to help keep our beloved alive? Besides being active myself?

    read more
Post suggeriti
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    11 Views
    More progress on the AP implementation on my site. I got HTTP signature verification on Follow activities working and started the groundwork to migrate from my current instance to my website. Some things I want to do before migrating: 1. Export my archive, I'm especially interested in preserving who I'm follows and bookmarks. 1. For bookmarks: Create a page on my site that links to the bookmarks. 1. For follows: Create an OPML file linking to their RSS feeds and add those feeds to my feed reader. One thing I will miss after I retire my instance is the timeline. I always discover interesting posts and people that way. My plan is to follow RSS feeds for tags that I'm interested in. I know it's not as good or spontaneous as the timeline but it's a way to stay engaged in the conversation. Also, my site effectively will work one-way for now. I don't have a way to receive replies or DMs, nor do I have a way of replying to people directly from my site. Maybe that's something I'll add later on but not a priority at the moment. My main priority at the moment is to maintain a presence in the Fediverse without having to maintain my own instance. I know technically I could just join someone else's instance, but I don't want to create yet another account nor become a maintenance burden for someone else. More importantly though, I want my website to be my digital hub, with protocols like ActivityPub, Nostr, and AT Protocol serving as spokes to reach different networks. My content and identity remain on my site, independent of any single platform. If any protocol or network disappears, my content and identity remain intact.
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    8 Views
    Huh, I’m nearing 1,000 followers on here! And it’s been so much nicer than Instagram the whole time. I actually feel connected to people here, instead of just posting into an ad network void. Thank you to all of you who follow me. I really enjoy my time here with all of you around. It genuinely means a lot, and I feel lucky to have you around.#socialmedia #mastodon #mastoArt #embroidery #artist #throwbackThursday
  • 0 Votes
    8 Posts
    40 Views
    @bovaz @stefan @tsadilas indeed. And for WordPress, the fact that you can e.g. comment on a WP article from the rest of the Fediverse really drives the “shared social network” concept. And IIRC they are working on making the integration even tighter (esp. in the other direction).I'm not familiar enough with Ghost's integration to comment on that though.
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    16 Views
    @WeirdWriter @rysiek These two paragraphs struck me in particular:> That’s in stark contrast to, say, Google+, which despite corporate backing, incomparably larger budget, and being pushed down people’s throats through forced integration with YouTube, survived mere seven years, nine months, and a week.Because unfortunately Google probably doesn't see that as a problem. Or even as the Fedi winning. For them, longetivity doesn't matter, but peak user count.> And once it shut down, it shut down. A social network of millions just blipped out of existence one day. All those moments – lost in time, like tears in rain.This, too, for them is a good thing. No-one else can profit from "their" data.This just makes it so crystal clear how the big one's interests aren't aligned with ours. Google+ wasn't really failing in their book, it had served its purpose and then ceased to do so. To us, this is loss. To Google this is just business.