After many years, I've just started testing #MooseFS again.
Uncategorized
6
Posts
5
Posters
16
Views
-
@stefano nice, worth a check now that IBM killed glusterfs.
-
@stefano nice, worth a check now that IBM killed glusterfs.
@Nux Would you happen to have a URL handy to some blog post or article on the killing of GlusterFS? I am superficially interested in things file system.
-
-
This post is deleted!
-
@stefano ah,
For a melancholy moment, I was reminded of Wuala. In the good old days, before LaCie got its hand on it.
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@Gina such a cuties
-
@cancel from reading the report from the copy right office it sounds like it is less of a matter of was a computer involved and more whether the human author did anything at all.
-
Current* conditions near Alpena, MI:
-
@res260 Sadly a likely observation :\
So many people just giving up on their craft.
-
@cwebber things sure are changing fast. code quality for example. and the ability of developers to write or recognize good code. now the direction of change isn't great, but...
-
@cwebber I'm hanging out there a lot and yes there is a lot of vibecoding. However, they don't seem to vibecode more than the average paid software dev.
In 2024, I'd say about 20% of my friends vibecoded. Today the number looks more like 90%. This is not specific to atproto, my understanding is that most people vibecode nowadays.
-
(Reposted as unlisted to not pollute my instance's discovery with slop-related content)
The US Supreme Court has declined to hear the AI copyright case. So, the new Copyright Office guidance that says the output of prompting systems that produce art, sound, text, etc., cannot be copyrighted, no matter how many times the human re-prompts or iterates the system, is upheld: https://www.theverge.com/policy/887678/supreme-court-ai-art-copyright
(Guidance from Copyright Office: https://copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intelligence-Part-2-Copyrightability-Report.pdf )
So, unless I'm misunderstanding somethingโฆ
1) If your corporate codebase is written with AI, and it leaks to the public, too bad -- no copyright protections. People can take it and use it.
2) AI generated code is incompatible with GPL and GPL-like projects, because GPL requires copyright to be assigned in order to enforce the license. (Edit: only a problem if the project is 100% AI, since public domain can be mixed into GPL without problem.)
Is that really what's happening? Am I misunderstanding something here?
-
Trump si conferma come il Presidente che ha ucciso piรน statunitensi in patria e allโestero.
From: @peacelink
https://sociale.network/@peacelink/116165350333099284
Post suggeriti
-
Latest ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐ก๐ฒ๐๐ - ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฑ/๐ญ๐ฎ/๐ฎ๐ฎ (Valuable News - 2025/12/22) available.
News
1
-
-
-
Interview with Igor Ostapenko: Starting FreeBSD Development'nIn this FreeBSD Journal article, Igor Ostapenko shares how he first got involved with FreeBSD, his path into operating system work, and his advice for new contributors.
Uncategorized
1
