What do we want
-
@dtl A lot of gamer hardware (coloured lights on water cooling blocks and the temperature thresholds for when the pumps kick in ) can now configured by WebUSB to prevent having to write custom apps.
Forcing people to user Chrome to configure hardware is a pain
(Or so I'm told from a bunch of podcasts I listen to about folks doing gaming stuff on Linux...)
@ben I was just trying to add a new Bluetooth to WiFi gateway to the system, nothing too fancy. Plug in ESP32 board and hit flash, then I hit all the issues elsewhere in this thread.
-
@dtl As I mentioned before, I unfortunately don't have either the spoons or the time to actually get around to writing that any time soon. I just have the "rough sketch" of how it would probably work. But will do if I ever manage to start it and get to a working state.
My current project list is about a mile long:
- Finish lego Notre Dame
- Finish that little laser-wood bookshelf diorama
- Build the Yukikaze PlaMo I just acquired
- Do Something with my model railway layout
- Put the "borrowed" RAM back into my SGI box and buy some new stuff for the IPX lunchbox
- Finish reverse engineering my radio scanner's memory format (I have basic channels down, but that's it) and implementing it in CHIRP
- More stuff I've forgotten about until I see the pile of parts lying around
@becomethewaifu same, too many projects not enough me.
-
What do we want?
WebSerial and WebBluetooth in #FirefoxWhat don't we want?
Any AI shit in Firefox.@dtl UDP!
-
@dtl Hell, even a form of WebUSB where the device (or OS driver/config) needs to be explicit about enabling WebUSB access (which moots 99% of mozilla's "security concerns") would be great...
I've been tempted to do a "native extension" thing that implements webUSB-as-RPC with a 'shim' extension and small daemon, but that requires both spoons and time, of which I have neither... Someone already made one for the FileSystem API IIRC.
@becomethewaifu @dtl and for WebSerial
-
What do we want?
WebSerial and WebBluetooth in #FirefoxWhat don't we want?
Any AI shit in Firefox.@dtl WebSerial is being actively worked on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=926940
I don't think that's the case with WebBluetooth.
With that said, I can't wait for people complaining about the browser breaking some hw.
-
What do we want?
WebSerial and WebBluetooth in #FirefoxWhat don't we want?
Any AI shit in Firefox.@dtl Web browsers interacting with peripherals still seems like alien technology to me...I never really moved past thinking of them as document viewers.
-
@dtl Web browsers interacting with peripherals still seems like alien technology to me...I never really moved past thinking of them as document viewers.
@growlph I generally agree. Except sometimes it would be really useful.
-
@growlph I generally agree. Except sometimes it would be really useful.
@dtl Yeah I'm not against it, making stuff more accessible is a good thing, it just creates some cognitive dissonance to learn that it exists at all.
-
What do we want?
WebSerial and WebBluetooth in #FirefoxWhat don't we want?
Any AI shit in Firefox.@dtl@8bitorbust.info i'd actually rather not give my browser access to either of those things -
@dtl@8bitorbust.info i'd actually rather not give my browser access to either of those things@dtl@8bitorbust.info like, not even in theory. if they add it, then i would like a version of the binary that does not include the code implementing this feature. same for WebUSB.
-
@dtl@8bitorbust.info like, not even in theory. if they add it, then i would like a version of the binary that does not include the code implementing this feature. same for WebUSB.
@linear fair enough, I disagree, but I can see why you might not want it.
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic on