@iams exactly. There's a huge difference. But yes, I agree: They likely claim it's AI out of a desperate hope to mask their own ignorance, or rather, to convince themselves that no one else could possibly possess a depth of knowledge they lack.

It was sorta warming up when I headed out for this morning's bike ride, 10°F (-12C) and no wind. But either blood thinned out or gloves were damp, because I was stopping every ten minutes to try and get life back into the fingers.
Another inch of snow last night and mine were the first tire tracks. Looked like a Coyote had taken a liking to the single track, I was following their footsteps for quite a while.

#BikeTooter #NHwx

@hackeryarn so, to sum up: if it's perfect, it's AI. If it's not perfect, it's AI. It's always AI 😂

@stefano Huh. I read your "I Solve Problems" and, unlike AI, any disjointed prose therein had purpose. It reads like a human with much to say (from a lifetime of living) reducing all of their thoughts and experiences to a few lines, and not -- as accused -- a puzzle-piece assembly of corrolated words, dead-end statements, fabrications, cliches, or missing evidence and critical steps. As someone else said already it's likely your accuser is a poor writer, poor reader, and relies on AI for both.

Stasera di Giuseppe Ungaretti (Alessandria d’Egitto, 1888 – Milano, 1970)

Balaustrata di brezza
per appoggiare stasera
la mia malinconia ... https://cctm.website/giuseppe-ungaretti-stasera/

#giuseppeungaretti #poesia #malinconia #cctmwebsite #anoipiaceleggere #leggere

@stefano I feel this. On my last article my spell checker broke because of an update so the final edit ended up getting published with few misspelled words… oops.

Multiple people commented that it was a technique to make an AI generated article seem more human 🤦

@kissyagni 🙌🙌🙌 @leanderlindahl @EUCommission

@gabardino Salvini torna qui!