Does anyone know of any sex worker friendly/safe instances who allow advertising/content selling?
Uncategorized
7
Posts
3
Posters
0
Views
-
Does anyone know of any sex worker friendly/safe instances who allow advertising/content selling?
-
Does anyone know of any sex worker friendly/safe instances who allow advertising/content selling?
@babe Check the "kinkycats". They are very sexworkers friendly and I think they may allow such type of toots as well.
-
@babe Check the "kinkycats". They are very sexworkers friendly and I think they may allow such type of toots as well.
@MartinaNeumayer That's one I had a look at but while it says sex positive it doesn't explicitly mention sex work anywhere, either in allowing it or saying it's not allowed, so it's a little ambiguous
-
Does anyone know of any sex worker friendly/safe instances who allow advertising/content selling?
I know a lot that allow NSFW content generally but I cannot think of a single one that's public anymore that explicitly mentions allowing sex work.
-
@MartinaNeumayer That's one I had a look at but while it says sex positive it doesn't explicitly mention sex work anywhere, either in allowing it or saying it's not allowed, so it's a little ambiguous
@babe You can always ask the boss..
@bastetandptah Can you please confirm this or correct me if I'm wrong?
Thank you in advance Dear 😘 -
@babe You can always ask the boss..
@bastetandptah Can you please confirm this or correct me if I'm wrong?
Thank you in advance Dear 😘@MartinaNeumayer we have already other sexworkers like @harmonycorrupted who can verify that the instance is sex workers friendly and we can ensure that. @babe
-
I know a lot that allow NSFW content generally but I cannot think of a single one that's public anymore that explicitly mentions allowing sex work.
(this isn't for me, as a lawyer I've already got my own instance)
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic on
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@tess I'm actually asking a real question about the craft.
-
@aeva I don't think your interpretation of RFC 2119 SHOULD is correct. RFC 2119 SHOULD basically means "MUST, unless you have a really good reason."
-
@alice I got mine before the move to AZ because I wasn't sure they'd even be available here.
Gladly there's pockets of actual humans here in this "red" state. (I think it's turning blue from what I hear. Well, it's more blue now with me here rofl)
-
-
@aeva I think there's an interesting part of your answer. There's a minimum amount of time just to deal with dependency changes, triage bugs and hopefully fix some. But doing that minimum is probably not sustainable -- it probably means you're losing interest in the project. Having a little more time for new features, refactors, and so on is probably better for the long term.
-
@alice @benroyce @lispi314
Are you hiring, do you need a developer, if you like i can run the whole dev department. i am a people person what is wrong with youuuuuu?
-
@aeva thank you so much for this answer! It really means a lot to me.
-
@evan
and I'm not talking about very small projects.
it also depends what the project is.
If you fail in it, what will happen with the people who uses your project?Will there life goes on without it?
"with great power comes great responsibility"....and you should have a team, a bus can hit you and the project (your legacy) is unmaintained forever.
So, I still stand with my first answer: as much as you want and as long as it's healthy.
+ GET A TEAM ;-)
