Manipolazioni https://blog.quintarelli.it/2025/09/manipolazioni/
-
Manipolazioni https://blog.quintarelli.it/2025/09/manipolazioni/
-
Manipolazioni https://blog.quintarelli.it/2025/09/manipolazioni/
@quinta Speechless.
-
undefined quinta - Stefano Quintarelli ha condiviso questa discussione
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@versodiverso infatti, si dovrebbe pensare a tutte quelle persone che non sono in grado di gestire i social.
-
Comunque volevo dirvi che da noi fanno ancora la raccolta differenziata porta a porta *e* hanno messo i cassonetti per la differenziata con tessera sanitaria. E ne hanno già distrutto uno.
-
darius@friend.camp but to answer your initial query, I feel that summary is always going to be subservient to content. It's either a truncation or derivative of content, so if you have the capabilities to parse content, just use that in its entirety and pass over summary
(Until T&S standardize CWs, but that's a different story)
-
@julian @darius Hugo does the same by default, taking the first ~70 characters to the nearest word boundary (or something like that).
i'm just pointing out that there might be some needed disambiguation with how `summary` is used, to account for this kind of "excerpt vs subtitle", "duplicative vs additive" usage.
-
@criminalerin I like the joke but that's easy, 0 is female and 1 is male.
-
UE leader nei supercomputer (il secondo è italiano). Sull’Ai però va piano, Draghi: “Il divario con gli altri è netto”
@news
https://www.eunews.it/2025/09/16/ue-leader-nei-supercomputer/
L'HPC6 di Eni è il sesto computer al mondo. Ursula von der Leyen lo cita nel suo discorso a un anno dal rapporto dell'ex presidente della BCE
-
trwnh@mastodon.social end of the day. I think it's up to each implementor as to how they wish to populate summary.
NodeBB takes the first few sentences adding up to but not exceeding 500 characters, and uses those. It does change the HTML because simple truncation would leave you with broken or unfinished tags.
That's probably why darius@friend.camp said they were almost the same.
-
@darius @julian @technical-discussion one thing this suggests is that there is a semantic difference between "summary" in the sense of providing a short blurb that is additive to the content (kinda like a subheading!), vs "summary" in the sense of providing an excerpt to be used as a kind of preview (as in a list of articles)
