Hey #rsync experts!
Senza categoria
3
Post
3
Autori
0
Visualizzazioni
-
Hey #rsync experts! I have a dilemma. I do a daily backup to an external disk, but some of the files (VM containers) are HUGE (100GB), and because they are zero-padded, their size is always the same. By the time the rsync for these files finishes, they have wildly different mod dates from the originals on my HDD. I can set --modify-wiindow to $BIGNUM, but then all the regular files *don't* back up.
Maybe the answer is to touch all the big files (originals and backup) at the end of the rsync?
-
undefined Evan Prodromou ha condiviso questa discussione
-
Hey #rsync experts! I have a dilemma. I do a daily backup to an external disk, but some of the files (VM containers) are HUGE (100GB), and because they are zero-padded, their size is always the same. By the time the rsync for these files finishes, they have wildly different mod dates from the originals on my HDD. I can set --modify-wiindow to $BIGNUM, but then all the regular files *don't* back up.
Maybe the answer is to touch all the big files (originals and backup) at the end of the rsync?
@pluralistic excluding these big files and setting up a separate run of your backup script with them is (not) an option?
-
Hey #rsync experts! I have a dilemma. I do a daily backup to an external disk, but some of the files (VM containers) are HUGE (100GB), and because they are zero-padded, their size is always the same. By the time the rsync for these files finishes, they have wildly different mod dates from the originals on my HDD. I can set --modify-wiindow to $BIGNUM, but then all the regular files *don't* back up.
Maybe the answer is to touch all the big files (originals and backup) at the end of the rsync?
@pluralistic I am not an expert, and I personally hate it when I ask a question and people answer a different question, BUT I'm going to do that anyway:
Could you mount the VM container image(s) on source and destination and rsync their filesystems separately?
-
undefined Oblomov ha condiviso questa discussione
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
-
BTW, I set up the timeline with a template and memorable address.
-
-
Maybe this is why I don't see the point of chatbots. I've just never had a problem politely asking computers for information and having them answer clearly.
Maybe the unwashed masses are just disabled and looking fof accommodations.
-
Set Phone to… Hyperspectral
While our eyes are miraculous little devices, they aren’t very sensitive outside of the normal old red, green, and blue spectra. The camera in your phone is far more sensitive, and scientists want to use those sensors in place of expensive hyperspectral ones. Researchers at Purdue have a cunning plan: use a calibration card.
The idea is to take a snap of the special card and use it to understand the camera’s exact response to different colors in the current lighting conditions. Once calibrated to the card, they can detect differences as small as 1.6 nanometers in light wavelengths. That’s on par with commercial hyperspectral sensors, according to the post.
You may wonder why you would care. Sensors like this are useful for medical diagnostic equipment, analysis of artwork, monitoring air quality, and more. Apparently, high-end whisky has a distinctive color profile, so you can now use your phone to tell if you are getting the cheap stuff or not.
We also imagine you might find a use for this in phone-based spectrometers. There is plenty to see in the hyperspectral world.
-
Since React launched, I have been labouring under the misapprehension that JSX was a little-used ECMAScript feature that had been dropped from the standard. But I was wrong! I was thinking of E4X, which worked a lot like JSX, and was supported by Firefox from the mid-2000s to the early 2010s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaScript_XML
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECMAScript_for_XML
It's interesting that Facebook decided to reinvent E4X, rather than using the existing standard.
-
@sundogplanets Deponia, but it's real life
-
Dato che non c'è due senza tre... mi aggancio qui perché dopo aver atteso qualche giorno il senso di nausea mi risale quindi ho deciso come prima cosa di eliminare il mio profilo linkedin già serviva a poco tanto meno mi servono nuovi clienti da quella socialfogna; secondo posso permettermi, già da subito, di non rinnovare certe consulenze "in scadenza". Nella mia personale classifica sono pochi per non dire pochissimi i clienti che non abbiano scelto la raccolta fondi avida e senza scrupoli, se poi lascio solo quelli che si comportano in modo corretto con dipendenti e sopratutto fornitori terzi mi sa che non si arriva alla decina... meglio pochi e dignitosi. Ad Maiora!
