“I'm afraid,” he said at last, “that the Question and the Answer are mutually exclusive.
Uncategorized
1
Posts
1
Posters
5
Views
-
“I'm afraid,” he said at last, “that the Question and the Answer are mutually exclusive. Knowledge of one logically precludes knowledge of the other. It is impossible that both can ever be known about the same Universe.”
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic on
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
Malattie rare, ora colpiscono 36 milioni di persone. Nell’UE avanzano, con l’Europa ferma al palo
@news
https://www.eunews.it/2025/12/15/malattie-rare-ora-colpiscono-36-milioni-di-persone-nellue-avanzano-con-leuropa-ferma-al-palo/
In Parlamento europeo si fa il punto della situazione, e i conti non tornano: si sa che sono circa 8mila, ma mancano una definizione chiara e terapie. La ricerca la chiave per la cura, necessaria per malati in un aumento
-
@ghalfacree you have my sympathy - that is not a fun keyboard to type on! (looking forward to reading the review!)
-
@arkjun@hackers.pub 実はそれは私もよく知らないですね。😂
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
@Yaku
Ho cominciato a cercare ma ci sono solo plugin per disabilitare l'editor a blocchi, non quello tradizionale. Continuo a cercare
-
My full review will be going up on #Hackster later in the day, and it's a big 'un - written, because as I've said before I will always commit to the bit, on the Commodore 64 Ultimate itself, in Mini Office II. Got to admit, I haven't used that in a few years. Or, err... decades.
-
And... yeah, it works. The only thing that gave it even the slightest pause was the Sound Expander, and only because I had to manually disable the internal virtual "cartridge" to route the signals properly - a quick flip in the settings menu, no more than that.
-
"By comparison, at least, the way the Chinese government speaks about AI is more modest. Yes, China’s economic leadership views AI as a priority and has boldly claimed it seeks to lead the world by 2030. Yet the rhetoric lacks the eschatological tone common in Silicon Valley. Chinese economic planners appear more interested in AI as a tool for industrial processes than as a means of creating a superintelligence that will reach the singularity. The State Council’s 2025 “AI+” initiative is focused entirely on efficiency-enhancing applications rather than intelligence explosions.
There is another important difference. China is banking far more heavily on simpler, lower-cost open-source AI models. In the US, most of the leading “frontier” AI models are secret and proprietary, in part as a business model and in part due to the apocryphal fears that the wrong actors could trigger human extinction. The smaller, lower-cost Chinese models may be seeking, in that sense, to be the more nimble 1970s Toyota rivals to the giant American cars produced by General Motors.
More importantly, China is hedging its bets by investing heavily in a wide range of other technologies that might reasonably be described as “the future”. In 2024, the country invested an estimated $940bn in clean-energy capex, broadly defined as renewables, electricity grids and energy storage (batteries), dwarfing its AI investments. In these sectors, AI is meant to be a complement — the glue rather than the structure.
While China’s overall economy remains weaker than it was in the 2010s, elements of this broader strategy seem to be bearing fruit."
https://www.ft.com/content/12581344-6e37-45a0-a9d5-e3d6a9f8d9ba
