I... 👉👈 I made an Open Source.
Uncategorized
6
Posts
4
Posters
0
Views
-
I... 👉👈 I made an Open Source. 🤭
It's a C# front-end for #GodotEngine
🦮
(for libgodot, to be specific)Sill very early, and quite janky. Fun! Take the sad blue robot for walkies!
-
I... 👉👈 I made an Open Source. 🤭
It's a C# front-end for #GodotEngine
🦮 (for libgodot, to be specific)Sill very early, and quite janky. Fun! Take the sad blue robot for walkies!
Soon(tm) this will hopefully become a nuget package, but since godot dev builds are verifiably huge, I still have to figure out the logistics of that. 🏋️♀️
-
Soon(tm) this will hopefully become a nuget package, but since godot dev builds are verifiably huge, I still have to figure out the logistics of that. 🏋️♀️
@jupiter "huge"
*looks at her UE5 build folder*
-
I... 👉👈 I made an Open Source. 🤭
It's a C# front-end for #GodotEngine
🦮 (for libgodot, to be specific)Sill very early, and quite janky. Fun! Take the sad blue robot for walkies!
@jupiter awesome stuff! I had been wondering about the possibility of using libgodot from a C# project lately, it's brilliant to see it actually being done.
-
@jupiter awesome stuff! I had been wondering about the possibility of using libgodot from a C# project lately, it's brilliant to see it actually being done.
@Devilbox thanks! Still a lot of things to try out, but it works!
I'm looking into trying GDextension over the really weird GodotSharp stuff that kept (and keeps) me thoroughly befuddled.
But just seeing that headless unit test run was a moment of beauty that made it all worth it. (I want to build an engine to accompany this, that uses a different resource and node architecture, and predominantly uses RenderingServer etc.)
It's cool though to just be able to play& control normal Godot PCKs.
-
I... 👉👈 I made an Open Source. 🤭
It's a C# front-end for #GodotEngine
🦮 (for libgodot, to be specific)Sill very early, and quite janky. Fun! Take the sad blue robot for walkies!
@jupiter wow this is super cool! Is it to get some special integration with fennecs?
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic on
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
-
What's the best accessory for a night out?
-
Is it easy to migrate from Firefox and keep saved bookmarks and login passwords ?
-
I worry everything is getting stupider
-
@jon No AI is based.
-
Is the Theory of Special Relativity Wrong?
There’s an adage coined by [Ian Betteridge] that any headline ending in a question mark can be answered by the word “No”. However, Lorentz invariance – the theory that the same rules of physics apply in the same way in all frames of reference, and an essential component of special relativity – has been questioned for some time by researchers trying to unify general relativity and quantum field theory into a theory of quantum gravity. Many theories of quantum gravity break Lorentz invariance by giving photons with different energy levels very slightly different speeds of light – a prediction which now looks less likely since researchers recently analyzed gamma ray data from pulsed astronomical sources, and found no evidence of speed variation (open-access paper).
The researchers specifically looked for the invariance violations predicted by the Standard-Model Extension (SME), an effective field theory that unifies special relativity with the Standard Model. The variations in light speed which it predicts are too small to measure directly, so instead, the researchers analyzed gamma ray flare data collected from pulsars, active galactic nuclei, and gamma-ray bursts (only sources that emitted gamma rays in simultaneous pulses could be used). Over such great distances as these photons had traveled, even slight differences in speed between photons with different energy levels should have added up to a detectable delay between photons, but none was found.
This work doesn’t disprove the SME, but it does place stricter bounds on the Lorentz invariance violations it allows, about one and a half orders of magnitude stricter than those previously found. This study also provides a method for new experimental data to be more easily integrated into the SME. Fair warning to anyone reading the paper: the authors call their work “straightforward,” from which we can only conclude that the word takes on a new meaning after a few years studying mathematics.
If you want to catch up on relativity and Lorentz invariance, check out this quick refresher, or this somewhat mind-bending explanation. For an amateur, it’s easier to prove general relativity than special relativity.
Top image: Crab Pulsar, one of the gamma ray sources analysed. (Credit: J. Hester et al., NASA/HST/ASU/J)
-
Brescia: giornata di azioni antisfratto promosse da “diritti per tutti”
@anarchia
Lotta per la casa. Giornata di mobilitazione contro gli sfratti il 15 gennaio 2026 con attiviste e attivisti dell’Associazione Diritti per tutti di Brescia impegnati in tre azioni https://www.rivoluzioneanarchica.it/brescia-giornata-di-azioni-antisfratto-promosse-da-diritti-per-tutti/
-
Signal, the private messaging app.
Curious to see what the uptake is on Fedi.
#poll #signalApp
