Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

Oh, serendipity!

Uncategorized
89 41 0
  • Oh, serendipity! A few things line up together, creating opportunities for rare discoveries. This time it's a thing that probably will require someone to go and edit the Wikipedia page for Ubuntu...

    How did we end up here? Well, first, I've been meaning to play with an old Ubuntu for a long time. Second, Atsuko unpacked out our Pentium III desktop last week. Third, Atsuko left me alone for half a day, and the only thing I could bring myself to do was trying out different Linuxes on this Pentium III machine.

    Buckle up, I'm about to share many screenshots of old Live CDs, and some of them might surprise you (a little bit?).

    Thread 🧵

  • Oh, serendipity! A few things line up together, creating opportunities for rare discoveries. This time it's a thing that probably will require someone to go and edit the Wikipedia page for Ubuntu...

    How did we end up here? Well, first, I've been meaning to play with an old Ubuntu for a long time. Second, Atsuko unpacked out our Pentium III desktop last week. Third, Atsuko left me alone for half a day, and the only thing I could bring myself to do was trying out different Linuxes on this Pentium III machine.

    Buckle up, I'm about to share many screenshots of old Live CDs, and some of them might surprise you (a little bit?).

    Thread 🧵

    @nina_kali_nina wow 4.10! so old

  • Oh, serendipity! A few things line up together, creating opportunities for rare discoveries. This time it's a thing that probably will require someone to go and edit the Wikipedia page for Ubuntu...

    How did we end up here? Well, first, I've been meaning to play with an old Ubuntu for a long time. Second, Atsuko unpacked out our Pentium III desktop last week. Third, Atsuko left me alone for half a day, and the only thing I could bring myself to do was trying out different Linuxes on this Pentium III machine.

    Buckle up, I'm about to share many screenshots of old Live CDs, and some of them might surprise you (a little bit?).

    Thread 🧵

    I guess I'll start with the conclusion: Ubuntu Live CD, at least 4.10, is a Knoppix derivative.

    "No, that can't be right, Ubuntu is based on Debian!"

    And so is Knoppix. And so is Knoppix fork called Morphix that was used as a LiveCD builder for Ubuntu 4.10. I have irrefutable evidence of this, and I am surprised that no one on the Internet seemingly ever mentioned that before.

    That is not to say that Ubuntu is not based on Debian - it is. I am not trying to say that it does not come with its own packages and kernel, either. But it is _also_ based on Morphix, at least in LiveCD 4.10.

    First, I'll share a few screenshots hinting at the similarities. Then I'll show you the solid proof I'm talking about. And then I'll just share a bunch of screenshots of old Linuxes just for fun!

    GRUB and splash screens are not a smoking gun, but consider how similar Ubuntu 4.10 Live and Morphix 0.5 boot experiences are (both circa October 2004).

    ( 🧵 cont)

  • I guess I'll start with the conclusion: Ubuntu Live CD, at least 4.10, is a Knoppix derivative.

    "No, that can't be right, Ubuntu is based on Debian!"

    And so is Knoppix. And so is Knoppix fork called Morphix that was used as a LiveCD builder for Ubuntu 4.10. I have irrefutable evidence of this, and I am surprised that no one on the Internet seemingly ever mentioned that before.

    That is not to say that Ubuntu is not based on Debian - it is. I am not trying to say that it does not come with its own packages and kernel, either. But it is _also_ based on Morphix, at least in LiveCD 4.10.

    First, I'll share a few screenshots hinting at the similarities. Then I'll show you the solid proof I'm talking about. And then I'll just share a bunch of screenshots of old Linuxes just for fun!

    GRUB and splash screens are not a smoking gun, but consider how similar Ubuntu 4.10 Live and Morphix 0.5 boot experiences are (both circa October 2004).

    ( 🧵 cont)

    @nina_kali_nina ...morphix?

  • Oh, serendipity! A few things line up together, creating opportunities for rare discoveries. This time it's a thing that probably will require someone to go and edit the Wikipedia page for Ubuntu...

    How did we end up here? Well, first, I've been meaning to play with an old Ubuntu for a long time. Second, Atsuko unpacked out our Pentium III desktop last week. Third, Atsuko left me alone for half a day, and the only thing I could bring myself to do was trying out different Linuxes on this Pentium III machine.

    Buckle up, I'm about to share many screenshots of old Live CDs, and some of them might surprise you (a little bit?).

    Thread 🧵

    @nina_kali_nina the CRT glow is magic :}

  • I guess I'll start with the conclusion: Ubuntu Live CD, at least 4.10, is a Knoppix derivative.

    "No, that can't be right, Ubuntu is based on Debian!"

    And so is Knoppix. And so is Knoppix fork called Morphix that was used as a LiveCD builder for Ubuntu 4.10. I have irrefutable evidence of this, and I am surprised that no one on the Internet seemingly ever mentioned that before.

    That is not to say that Ubuntu is not based on Debian - it is. I am not trying to say that it does not come with its own packages and kernel, either. But it is _also_ based on Morphix, at least in LiveCD 4.10.

    First, I'll share a few screenshots hinting at the similarities. Then I'll show you the solid proof I'm talking about. And then I'll just share a bunch of screenshots of old Linuxes just for fun!

    GRUB and splash screens are not a smoking gun, but consider how similar Ubuntu 4.10 Live and Morphix 0.5 boot experiences are (both circa October 2004).

    ( 🧵 cont)

    @nina_kali_nina @knoppix95 Remember any of that?

  • I guess I'll start with the conclusion: Ubuntu Live CD, at least 4.10, is a Knoppix derivative.

    "No, that can't be right, Ubuntu is based on Debian!"

    And so is Knoppix. And so is Knoppix fork called Morphix that was used as a LiveCD builder for Ubuntu 4.10. I have irrefutable evidence of this, and I am surprised that no one on the Internet seemingly ever mentioned that before.

    That is not to say that Ubuntu is not based on Debian - it is. I am not trying to say that it does not come with its own packages and kernel, either. But it is _also_ based on Morphix, at least in LiveCD 4.10.

    First, I'll share a few screenshots hinting at the similarities. Then I'll show you the solid proof I'm talking about. And then I'll just share a bunch of screenshots of old Linuxes just for fun!

    GRUB and splash screens are not a smoking gun, but consider how similar Ubuntu 4.10 Live and Morphix 0.5 boot experiences are (both circa October 2004).

    ( 🧵 cont)

    @nina_kali_nina nice, knoppix is a pretty interesting distribution. a while ago i read an old linux book from a library, back then most linux books would come with a live CD version of linux, and that book came with a slightly customized knoppix CD

    i do quite like pre-GNOME 3 ubuntu, it was simple, lean, and customizable. to me, linux mint is pretty similar to old ubuntu, the desktop is actually well put together and easy to customize and it doesn't shove advertisements and bloat into your face
  • I guess I'll start with the conclusion: Ubuntu Live CD, at least 4.10, is a Knoppix derivative.

    "No, that can't be right, Ubuntu is based on Debian!"

    And so is Knoppix. And so is Knoppix fork called Morphix that was used as a LiveCD builder for Ubuntu 4.10. I have irrefutable evidence of this, and I am surprised that no one on the Internet seemingly ever mentioned that before.

    That is not to say that Ubuntu is not based on Debian - it is. I am not trying to say that it does not come with its own packages and kernel, either. But it is _also_ based on Morphix, at least in LiveCD 4.10.

    First, I'll share a few screenshots hinting at the similarities. Then I'll show you the solid proof I'm talking about. And then I'll just share a bunch of screenshots of old Linuxes just for fun!

    GRUB and splash screens are not a smoking gun, but consider how similar Ubuntu 4.10 Live and Morphix 0.5 boot experiences are (both circa October 2004).

    ( 🧵 cont)

    @nina_kali_nina I remember using both back then but simply can’t remember any of it clearly now. Did Knoppix come first? I think it was pretty much the first usable live-cd way of doing things, and once that came out everything derived from that because that was how to do it. I used Knoppix a lot when it was the thing, because there wasn’t an easy to use alternative that I could easily use.

  • I guess I'll start with the conclusion: Ubuntu Live CD, at least 4.10, is a Knoppix derivative.

    "No, that can't be right, Ubuntu is based on Debian!"

    And so is Knoppix. And so is Knoppix fork called Morphix that was used as a LiveCD builder for Ubuntu 4.10. I have irrefutable evidence of this, and I am surprised that no one on the Internet seemingly ever mentioned that before.

    That is not to say that Ubuntu is not based on Debian - it is. I am not trying to say that it does not come with its own packages and kernel, either. But it is _also_ based on Morphix, at least in LiveCD 4.10.

    First, I'll share a few screenshots hinting at the similarities. Then I'll show you the solid proof I'm talking about. And then I'll just share a bunch of screenshots of old Linuxes just for fun!

    GRUB and splash screens are not a smoking gun, but consider how similar Ubuntu 4.10 Live and Morphix 0.5 boot experiences are (both circa October 2004).

    ( 🧵 cont)

    I made the discovery of Ubuntu 4.10 being based on Morphix by pure chance. The LiveCD didn't want to boot on my Pentium 3, so I restarted the system in the "expert mode". There I saw words "Morphix live CD". I would've completely ignored that if I didn't _just_ read that Morphix was one of the Knoppix forks from early 00s.

    It is a bit difficult to see, but if you check the photo of the CRT, you'd see that there are words "morphix rc" and "warty" on the same screen.

    Frankly, I was so surprised that I even thought, for a moment, that this Ubuntu 4.10 Live CD is a fake, a Morphix Live CD with Ubuntu skins and splash screen. But no, it is real Ubuntu Live CD, and you can download it too, right from the Ubuntu's website.

    This is pretty damning, but I have even more damning evidence of Ubuntu 4.10 Live being based off Morphix.

    ( 🧵 cont)

  • @nina_kali_nina I remember using both back then but simply can’t remember any of it clearly now. Did Knoppix come first? I think it was pretty much the first usable live-cd way of doing things, and once that came out everything derived from that because that was how to do it. I used Knoppix a lot when it was the thing, because there wasn’t an easy to use alternative that I could easily use.

    @u0421793 I'll talk about it a bit later, as I also have found a pretty rare ancient Knoppix 2.0

  • I guess I'll start with the conclusion: Ubuntu Live CD, at least 4.10, is a Knoppix derivative.

    "No, that can't be right, Ubuntu is based on Debian!"

    And so is Knoppix. And so is Knoppix fork called Morphix that was used as a LiveCD builder for Ubuntu 4.10. I have irrefutable evidence of this, and I am surprised that no one on the Internet seemingly ever mentioned that before.

    That is not to say that Ubuntu is not based on Debian - it is. I am not trying to say that it does not come with its own packages and kernel, either. But it is _also_ based on Morphix, at least in LiveCD 4.10.

    First, I'll share a few screenshots hinting at the similarities. Then I'll show you the solid proof I'm talking about. And then I'll just share a bunch of screenshots of old Linuxes just for fun!

    GRUB and splash screens are not a smoking gun, but consider how similar Ubuntu 4.10 Live and Morphix 0.5 boot experiences are (both circa October 2004).

    ( 🧵 cont)

    @nina_kali_nina I had a custom morphix back in the day, iirc it was super easy to make your own

  • I made the discovery of Ubuntu 4.10 being based on Morphix by pure chance. The LiveCD didn't want to boot on my Pentium 3, so I restarted the system in the "expert mode". There I saw words "Morphix live CD". I would've completely ignored that if I didn't _just_ read that Morphix was one of the Knoppix forks from early 00s.

    It is a bit difficult to see, but if you check the photo of the CRT, you'd see that there are words "morphix rc" and "warty" on the same screen.

    Frankly, I was so surprised that I even thought, for a moment, that this Ubuntu 4.10 Live CD is a fake, a Morphix Live CD with Ubuntu skins and splash screen. But no, it is real Ubuntu Live CD, and you can download it too, right from the Ubuntu's website.

    This is pretty damning, but I have even more damning evidence of Ubuntu 4.10 Live being based off Morphix.

    ( 🧵 cont)

    So, if you boot Ubuntu 4.10 and will check out its CD, you will find an interesting file /MorphixCD/morphix/mod.xml. The file is used to build the Morphix OS Live CD - actually Morphix 0.5 - but it uses archive.ubuntu instead of ftp.debian for its main repository. It also uses files from LaMont Jones'es personal repository :)

    And then dpkg lists a few packages from Morphix were specifically modified for Ubuntu.

    I don't think anyone ever tried to hide this. After all, all this information is pretty much in the open, from dmesg to the filesystem on the LiveCD. But it is interesting to see that it isn't mentioned anywhere, either. Not even by the Morphix's author.

    So, here we go: Ubuntu 4.10 LiveCD is a Knoppix+debian derivative.

    As far as I can tell, things have changed a lot in 5.04, so maybe this applies only to Ubuntu 4.10.

    ( screenshots 🧵 cont)

  • @nina_kali_nina I had a custom morphix back in the day, iirc it was super easy to make your own

    @amsomniac indeed, it is a pretty neat distro

  • @amsomniac indeed, it is a pretty neat distro

    @nina_kali_nina shame it's dead :/

  • Oh, serendipity! A few things line up together, creating opportunities for rare discoveries. This time it's a thing that probably will require someone to go and edit the Wikipedia page for Ubuntu...

    How did we end up here? Well, first, I've been meaning to play with an old Ubuntu for a long time. Second, Atsuko unpacked out our Pentium III desktop last week. Third, Atsuko left me alone for half a day, and the only thing I could bring myself to do was trying out different Linuxes on this Pentium III machine.

    Buckle up, I'm about to share many screenshots of old Live CDs, and some of them might surprise you (a little bit?).

    Thread 🧵

    @nina_kali_nina

    (Please don't let me interrupt you but I had to squeeeee at the Pentium III at 450)

  • So, if you boot Ubuntu 4.10 and will check out its CD, you will find an interesting file /MorphixCD/morphix/mod.xml. The file is used to build the Morphix OS Live CD - actually Morphix 0.5 - but it uses archive.ubuntu instead of ftp.debian for its main repository. It also uses files from LaMont Jones'es personal repository :)

    And then dpkg lists a few packages from Morphix were specifically modified for Ubuntu.

    I don't think anyone ever tried to hide this. After all, all this information is pretty much in the open, from dmesg to the filesystem on the LiveCD. But it is interesting to see that it isn't mentioned anywhere, either. Not even by the Morphix's author.

    So, here we go: Ubuntu 4.10 LiveCD is a Knoppix+debian derivative.

    As far as I can tell, things have changed a lot in 5.04, so maybe this applies only to Ubuntu 4.10.

    ( screenshots 🧵 cont)

    I've been using Ubuntu since version 6.06, and I had the impression that Ubuntu is fairly stable and versatile. I have been very surprised to discover today that Ubuntu 4.10 did not compare to other LiveCD Linuxes all that favourably.

    Morphix 0.5 booted on my Pentium 3 machine just fine, and found the internets, and had OpenOffice working (a bit later on that). But Ubuntu required me to run DHCP client manually, and its OpenOffice never fully loaded, even after I played a long match in Solitaire.

    ( screenshots 🧵 cont)

  • Oh, serendipity! A few things line up together, creating opportunities for rare discoveries. This time it's a thing that probably will require someone to go and edit the Wikipedia page for Ubuntu...

    How did we end up here? Well, first, I've been meaning to play with an old Ubuntu for a long time. Second, Atsuko unpacked out our Pentium III desktop last week. Third, Atsuko left me alone for half a day, and the only thing I could bring myself to do was trying out different Linuxes on this Pentium III machine.

    Buckle up, I'm about to share many screenshots of old Live CDs, and some of them might surprise you (a little bit?).

    Thread 🧵

    @nina_kali_nina ::memories come to surface, rushing with a supersonic shriek::

    Oh, man, ooph, haven't seen those screens for a hot minute.

    People under 30-something probably have no idea what Knoppix even was.

  • I've been using Ubuntu since version 6.06, and I had the impression that Ubuntu is fairly stable and versatile. I have been very surprised to discover today that Ubuntu 4.10 did not compare to other LiveCD Linuxes all that favourably.

    Morphix 0.5 booted on my Pentium 3 machine just fine, and found the internets, and had OpenOffice working (a bit later on that). But Ubuntu required me to run DHCP client manually, and its OpenOffice never fully loaded, even after I played a long match in Solitaire.

    ( screenshots 🧵 cont)

    I guess one really cool thing about Ubuntu is that it comes with Windows goodies on the CD: AbiWord, Audacity, Firefox (!!), GNU IMP, OpenOffice, GhostScript...

    But because of this, it doesn't have nearly as many goodies _in the system_ itself.

    ( screenshots 🧵 cont)

  • I guess one really cool thing about Ubuntu is that it comes with Windows goodies on the CD: AbiWord, Audacity, Firefox (!!), GNU IMP, OpenOffice, GhostScript...

    But because of this, it doesn't have nearly as many goodies _in the system_ itself.

    ( screenshots 🧵 cont)

    @nina_kali_nina yes i remember little me trying to run .exe-s on linux and wondering why they don't work

  • @nina_kali_nina ::memories come to surface, rushing with a supersonic shriek::

    Oh, man, ooph, haven't seen those screens for a hot minute.

    People under 30-something probably have no idea what Knoppix even was.

    @nina_kali_nina ok, where the hell did you find the stack of old CDs (or img thereof) for all that?


Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
Post suggeriti
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1 Views
    When Clever Hardware Hacks Bite Back: A Password Keeper Device AutopsySometimes you have this project idea in your mind that seems so simple and straightforward, and which feels just so right that you have to roll with it. Then, years later you stumble across the sad remnants of the tearful saga and the dismal failure that it portrays. Do you put it away again, like an unpleasant memory, or write it up in an article, as a tearful confession of past sins? After some coaxing by a friend, [Alessandro] worked up the courage to detail how he set about making a hardware-only password keeper, and why it failed.The idea was so simple: the device would pretend to be a keyboard and type the passwords for you. This is not that unusual, as hardware devices like the Mooltipass do something similar. Even better, it’d be constructed only out of parts lying around, including an ATtiny85 and an HD44780 display, with bit-banged USB connectivity.Prototyping the hardware on a breadboard.Overcoming the challenge of driving the LC display with one pin on the MCU required adding a 74HC595 demultiplexer and careful timing, which sort of worked when the stars aligned just right. Good enough, but what about adding new passwords?This is where things quickly skidded off the tracks in the most slapstick way possible, as [Alessandro] solved the problem of USB keyboard HID devices being technically ‘output-only’, by abusing the indicator statuses for Caps Lock, Num Lock, and Scroll Lock. By driving these from the host PC in just the right way you can use them as a sort of serial protocol. This incidentally turned out to be the most reliable part of the project.Where the project finally tripped and fell down the proverbial flight of stairs was when it came to making the bit-banged USB work reliably. As it turns out, USB is very unforgiving with its timing unlike PS/2, making for an infuriating user experience. After tossing the prototype hardware into a box, this is where the project gathered dust for the past years.If you want to give it a try yourself, maybe using an MCU that has more GPIO and perhaps even a USB hardware peripheral like the STM32F103, ESP32-S3 or something fruit-flavored, you can take a gander at the project files in the GitHub repository.We’re always happy to see projects that (ab)use the Lock status indicators, it’s always been one of our favorite keyboard hacks.hackaday.com/2026/02/07/when-c…
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    0 Views
    Silicon Valley accurately predicted the vibe coding era.
  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    0 Views
    @quinta #Firefox ha l'opzione "Copia link pulito". Ho una vaga memoria di un'applicazione analoga per #Android, ma non riesco più a ritrovarla
  • 0 Votes
    8 Posts
    8 Views
    @monnier you replied in the wrong thread!