Ryanair la spunta: gratis a bordo solo un piccolo bagaglio.
Uncategorized
2
Posts
2
Posters
0
Views
-
Ryanair la spunta: gratis a bordo solo un piccolo bagaglio. Ma i giudici chiedono più trasparenza
https://www.repubblica.it/economia/2026/02/26/news/ryanair_bagaglio_a_mano_piccolo_gratis_misure_ue-425185984/?utm_source=flipboard&utm_medium=activitypubPubblicato su Economia - La Repubblica @economia-la-repubblica-repubblica
-
Ryanair la spunta: gratis a bordo solo un piccolo bagaglio. Ma i giudici chiedono più trasparenza
https://www.repubblica.it/economia/2026/02/26/news/ryanair_bagaglio_a_mano_piccolo_gratis_misure_ue-425185984/?utm_source=flipboard&utm_medium=activitypubPubblicato su Economia - La Repubblica @economia-la-repubblica-repubblica
@repubblica @economia-la-repubblica-repubblica usate i giacconi multitasche all' interno
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@bestiolina non era:"Levante, tappami"? (cit.)
-
Eddie ma almeno una nota azzeccala ti prego 😩
-
Ma guardare Sanremo solo per criticarlo vale?
-
@mariosiniscalchi Perché scegliere?
-
Michael Jackson!
-
I will not be investigating further on either of these two scams. (The other guy is also still on the line, just emailed me today wondering why I'd ghosted him... I could still mess with him.)
I could still contact the issuing bank of the check. Someone wrote a bad check using their institution, and clearance is still pending. The crime is still in progress.
But the thing is, I don't have access to complete the case. The banks and LE DO. I don't have the power to do anything with any information I do dig up, and any problems I could cause these two by scambaiting them, risks retaliation that I can't protect myself from because they know who I am.
Further, I don't have the time and energy to do this. I'm disabled and looking for work (again). I have wasted enough time on these as it is.
I'd be eager and willing to offer my full cooperation to an investigation if I had the backing of institutions bigger than me. I've got some skills even (unlike the seniors the CU said had the worst end of it, which is true.)
But I can't go all Kitboga rogue on their asses. That's a full time job.
Meanwhile, .gov will put up a website!
https://www.helpwithmybank.gov/help-topics/fraud-scams/fraud/check-fraud/fraud-cashiers-check.html
Anyhow, I've covered my own ass by making the call and lodging a record with my bank. I wasn't any part of this scam. I won't spend the money, and I won't finish the work.
I guess I'll reply to her telling her I will not be sending her any refunds, as we have a contract (I have her signature, even if it's fake). I will not tell her she is suss. Let's see what she does.
I'm placing my bets on escalation to heavy manipulation and verbal abuse? As if I didn't have enough to worry about.
🧵
-
@GossiTheDog Ah yes the company that is known for it's ethics: https://wiki.icelist.is/index.php/Accenture
-
"Karen" might not even be in the US. But there is a CRIME IN PROGRESS that I reported the moment I confirmed it was a crime. The check hasn't even cleared yet. (It won't.) I have her pending in email waiting for my reply, waiting for me to send a cashier' check to a REAL US address! (It's residential.) I could say or do anything to keep her on the hook while more evidence is gathered, that between these two financial institutions, at least has a chance to make "her" job more difficult. And at best, could catch someone picking up the drop.
I could even do half this investigation myself. I already have with the low-hanging OSINT data! It's not *hard,* just no one has the will.
Hell, under these circumstances, "Karen" wouldn't even need to disguise the names and addresses. Because no one cares. It's just open season out there when it comes to fraud.
🧵
