Hey #ActivityPub friends.

[edent@mastodon.social]

@samedwards got it 🙂

[edent@mastodon.social]

@samedwards Aha! Thanks.

So does this look right to you?
http://example.viii.fi/outbox

[samedwards@mastodon.social]

@Edent Yup, that looks like what I'd expect to see, and mirrors Mastodon as well, ie. https://mastodon.social/users/Edent/outbox?page=true

[threkk@mastodon.social]

@Edent Delete and/or updating posts would be amazing. It would become a great reference implementation for basic ActivityPub interactions.

[edent@mastodon.social]

@threkk I'll have a think about how I could do that. Thanks 🙂

[threkk@mastodon.social]

@Edent No, thank you for making this <3

[silverpill@mitra.social]

@Edent

https://example.viii.fi/posts/69aeb347-03d0-dc44-83c8-9c7c488ff6e0.json

It is served by an instance of your bot? The value of inReplyTo in this document is an empty string, which is not a valid URI.

[edent@mastodon.social]

@silverpill good spot!
I assume if it isn't a reply, the field should be excluded?

Or should it be something else?

[julian@activitypub.space]

@edent@mastodon.social I've learned that it should be excluded altogether, and not a null value

[silverpill@mitra.social]

@julian @Edent Yep

(although I think we should bring back null)

[edent@mastodon.social]

@silverpill @julian @general
Ah, I assume that `cc` should also be null if it isn't copied to anyone?

[julian@activitypub.space]

@edent@mastodon.social :shrug: I was passing null around like candy but some implementations choke on that. In general, tolerance of odd values in cc is well handled, but I would just omit or send [].