I’m confused (you probably already knew that).
Uncategorized
9
Posts
4
Posters
1
Views
-
I’m confused (you probably already knew that). Is activitypub.space going to replace SocialHub? Is it cool (or even recommended) to create FEPs that use activitypub.space for discussion? #ActivityPub
-
I’m confused (you probably already knew that). Is activitypub.space going to replace SocialHub? Is it cool (or even recommended) to create FEPs that use activitypub.space for discussion? #ActivityPub
I am a former facilitator of SocialHub and part of the FEP team.
The whole idea of the FEP process is that it is accessible to all fedizens, and anyone can take the initiative and write, submit, and guide their own FEP document towards a FINAL status.
It is recommended practice to introduce a new FEP to the SocialHub developer forum for discussion, which the FEP forum category federates out. The forum thus also serves as an archive of past discussions around ActivityPub / fediverse evolution.
However, it is not *required* to discuss on SocialHub should you not want to do so for some reason. I'd say it has the disadvantage that it fragments discussion and it becomes harder to parse the 'body' of FEP's created over time. People would have to use the tracking issue accompanying a FEP to figure out where to discuss things.
But the freedom to choose is the important part. It helps lower the barrier to write FEP's.
-
I’m confused (you probably already knew that). Is activitypub.space going to replace SocialHub? Is it cool (or even recommended) to create FEPs that use activitypub.space for discussion? #ActivityPub
@eyeinthesky@mastodon.social my FEPs now host their discussion on ActivityPub.Space
Its entirely up to you where you want to do it. Some others use GitHub issues exclusively.
I built ActivityPub.Space because I wanted a place on the Fediverse to discuss AP development. A place that natively integrated with it, and a place that connects both the threadiverse and the wider fediverse.
-
I’m confused (you probably already knew that). Is activitypub.space going to replace SocialHub? Is it cool (or even recommended) to create FEPs that use activitypub.space for discussion? #ActivityPub
> @eyeinthesky@mastodon.social said in I’m confused (you probably already knew that).:
>
> Is activitypub.space going to replace SocialHub?As for this one — while ActivityPub.Space was create in the wake of a possible shutdown of SocialHub, the two are meant to be complementary. They are both listed on ActivityPub.rocks
-
> @eyeinthesky@mastodon.social said in I’m confused (you probably already knew that).:
>
> Is activitypub.space going to replace SocialHub?As for this one — while ActivityPub.Space was create in the wake of a possible shutdown of SocialHub, the two are meant to be complementary. They are both listed on ActivityPub.rocks
@julian Can you explain more about how they are complementary? (Not challenging the claim, just want to understand.) They seem to have significant overlap in their objectives. It feels a bit like another level of fractal fragmentation of fed dev discussions.
-
@julian Can you explain more about how they are complementary? (Not challenging the claim, just want to understand.) They seem to have significant overlap in their objectives. It feels a bit like another level of fractal fragmentation of fed dev discussions.
@eyeinthesky@mastodon.social there are complementary in the sense that they both speak ActivityPub and content on both is available on the other (standard federation limitations apply.)
-
@julian I don’t see the discussion about the collection filtering FEP that started a few days ago on SocialHub (although I see a few others), but I understand the goal. Thanks for the explanation.
Do I need to create an account to search activitypub.space?
-
I am a former facilitator of SocialHub and part of the FEP team.
The whole idea of the FEP process is that it is accessible to all fedizens, and anyone can take the initiative and write, submit, and guide their own FEP document towards a FINAL status.
It is recommended practice to introduce a new FEP to the SocialHub developer forum for discussion, which the FEP forum category federates out. The forum thus also serves as an archive of past discussions around ActivityPub / fediverse evolution.
However, it is not *required* to discuss on SocialHub should you not want to do so for some reason. I'd say it has the disadvantage that it fragments discussion and it becomes harder to parse the 'body' of FEP's created over time. People would have to use the tracking issue accompanying a FEP to figure out where to discuss things.
But the freedom to choose is the important part. It helps lower the barrier to write FEP's.
@smallcircles @eyeinthesky I like SocialHub and hope that it will remain online. But I haven't heard anything from its current admin for several months
-
@julian I don’t see the discussion about the collection filtering FEP that started a few days ago on SocialHub (although I see a few others), but I understand the goal. Thanks for the explanation.
Do I need to create an account to search activitypub.space?
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
Una pagina a caso dal:
A random page from:
#CodexSeraphinianus#LibriStrani #WeirdBooks #Surreal
#Asemic #AsemicArt #AsemicText
-
@davew It’s been a mixed bag for me but mostly leans towards success. :) As suggested above, maintaining context with the tools is the key factor.
Sometimes, responses to follow-up prompts often include snippets of code that, while correct, can sometimes be hard to see where they need to be applied as a change/addition/subtraction. I find myself prompting to, “Please provide the complete implementation with this update included.” and that (almost always) works.
It does feel magical,
though. 🪄
-
•
tiepido fuori
il richiamo del lago
aria di casa
-
@BoydStephenSmithJr @afreytes it's been some time since I last needed to share data, and in my days NTFS was “workable, but don't depend on it too much”, and vfat had the 4GB file limit. And of course forget about keeping the Unix permissions on either.
-
@davew My personal experience is only with Claude Code so far, and with it, the current state of things is to first have it make a plan that also details its “understanding” of the code base. That then you can edit and adapt, and only then let it make actual changes. You can even use different models for the different tasks and my configuration specifies to think hard on the planning phase (using more context).
-
One Grift After Another
-
@oblomov @afreytes IIRC, NTFS is writable from both, and relatively robust.
vfat also works, and that's what I use for USB drives shared between the systems.
I didn't dual boot long enough to find having a shared partition compelling. These days, with the way MS treats shared resources (boot sector, ESP, EFI entries / variables, etc.), I'd be concerned that MS Win would "screw up" any shared filesystem / partition.
-
Poll: Do you have a blog?
