In corporate advisories, you don't say "I love you."
Uncategorized
4
Posts
4
Posters
0
Views
-
In corporate advisories, you don't say "I love you." You say "We take our users privacy seriously," which means "we were storing your social security number in plaintext." I think that's beautiful.
-
In corporate advisories, you don't say "I love you." You say "We take our users privacy seriously," which means "we were storing your social security number in plaintext." I think that's beautiful.
@Dio9sys sharing (your private data) is caring
-
In corporate advisories, you don't say "I love you." You say "We take our users privacy seriously," which means "we were storing your social security number in plaintext." I think that's beautiful.
@Dio9sys
*whispers* -
In corporate advisories, you don't say "I love you." You say "We take our users privacy seriously," which means "we were storing your social security number in plaintext." I think that's beautiful.
@Dio9sys We are serious about taking your privacy.
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@stefano We are with you. Stay strong.
-
@biglesp indeed!
-
BetaKit, *please* enable the ActivityPub plugin on your WordPress site, so we can follow you directly on the Fediverse. It only takes a few minutes, and it makes you a native first-class part of the social web. #ElbowsUp
-
A good article on BetaKit about #FediMTL
https://betakit.com/can-canada-find-digital-sovereignty-in-the-fediverse/
-
@sarajw meeeeeeeeee
-
So who am I seeing on Saturday at SotB?
-
@andypiper :( I still remember him soldering in the car park at Oggcamp 2011. He was a good sport and I'll miss him.
-
@mos_8502 that can backfire. It'll invent bugs if there aren't any to find. Somebody blogged about prompting "improve the quality of the code in this project" over and over, and it ended up adding hundreds of thousands of lines of code. It doesn't know how to say "no" or "I don't know". Gotta be specific. "Check for common security bugs" is probably not dangerous, but I'd still feel better about telling it to use all available static analysis tools to find common security bugs.
