Salta al contenuto
0
  • Home
  • Piero Bosio
  • Blog
  • Mondo
  • Fediverso
  • News
  • Categorie
  • Old Web Site
  • Recenti
  • Popolare
  • Tag
  • Utenti
  • Home
  • Piero Bosio
  • Blog
  • Mondo
  • Fediverso
  • News
  • Categorie
  • Old Web Site
  • Recenti
  • Popolare
  • Tag
  • Utenti
Skin
  • Chiaro
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Scuro
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Predefinito (Cerulean)
  • Nessuna skin
Collassa

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone
  1. Home
  2. Categorie
  3. General Discussion
  4. A few facts and thoughts about #BlueSky being decentralized or not:

A few facts and thoughts about #BlueSky being decentralized or not:

Pianificato Fissato Bloccato Spostato General Discussion
blueskyatprotoactivitypubmastodon
3 Post 2 Autori 26 Visualizzazioni
  • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
  • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
  • Più Voti
Rispondi
  • Risposta alla discussione
Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
Questa discussione è stata eliminata. Solo gli utenti con diritti di gestione possono vederla.
  • res260@infosec.exchangeundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    res260@infosec.exchangeundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    res260@infosec.exchange
    scritto su ultima modifica di
    #1

    A few facts and thoughts about #BlueSky being decentralized or not:

    1. #ATProto (the protocol behind bluesky) is decentralized and open-source, but is controlled by a for-profit (albeit fiscally a public benefit) organization, "Bluesky Social PBC".

    2. "Bluesky" refers to a sum of ATProto concepts, notably the AppView (bsky.app), the main Personal Data Servers (PDS, bsky.social), and the Relays (or firehose, bsky.network). There are others, but they're the 3 important ones.

    3. Anyone can run their own AppView, PDS or Relay AND consume the content from/get their content consumed by the Bluesky infrastructure. HOWEVER, not everything is trivial or cheap to run.

    3.0 A PDS, which contains your data (account details but also posts, likes, follows, etc), is trivial and cheap to self-host. Cheaper than hosting a mastodon instance, even, because it does way less stuff and receives way less requests. See https://github.com/bluesky-social/pds

    3.1 An AppView (the presentation layer, where users interact with ATProto content) can be created by anyone, but the bsky.app backend is NOT open-source, so there are not a ton of options right now.
    EDIT: seems like I was wrong and that the bsky.app AppView is open-source: https://github.com/bluesky-social/atproto/tree/main/packages/bsky

    3.2 Running a relay is trivial but expensive to self-host. This is because its purpose is to act as an aggregator for all the PDS so that AppViews can consume the data in a way that scales better. The Bluesky relay implementation (bigsky) is open-source: https://github.com/bluesky-social/indigo/blob/main/cmd/bigsky/README.md
    About 2.5 months ago, 4.5TB of storage was needed and an OVH server costing 150$/month worked to host a full-atmosphere relay (more on that later).

    4.0 To make a comparison with #ActivityPub (the protocol behind #mastodon ), the AppView and PDS is the same thing in ActivityPub, and the concept of relay doesn't exist. There are advantages and drawbacks to both architectures, I might do a future post highlighting those.

    5.0 With those definitions out of the way, some observations:

    5.1 A lot of users self-host their PDS, but the vast majority of users chose the simpler option.

    5.2 There are some alternative AppViews built on ATProto, but the vast majority of users visit bsky.app.

    5.3 There are very little non-bluesky self-hosting of relays, mostly because of their prohibitive cost. Running the bigsky relay is expensive partly because of design decisions for ATProto and partly because it takes ALL content from ALL accounts for ALL the network on the atmosphere (in this case atmosphere == fediverse but for ATProto). This is like if your Mastodon instance queried ALL servers for ALL accounts querying ALL posts. In the future, there might exist relays that don't scrape ALL data but only a subset of it, which would bring down costs, but it's not yet the case.

    6.0 So "is Bluesky decentralized?"

    6.1 In theory, yes, everything that bluesky does on ATProto can be.

    6.2 In practice, however, the most decentralized part of Bluesky is the PDS, where the user data is stored, and even that is not that decentralized.

    6.3 Will it stay this way? I'm hopeful it won't, but I don't know. ATProto is fairly new compared to ActivityPub, and the ecosystem around it was mostly built by the BlueSky company, but I expect this to change in the future. However, the cost of entry for things built on ATProto will always be more than the cost of entry for things built on ActivityPub.

    6.4 Things built on ActivityPub will always be more decentralized than things built on ATProto, because of design decisions from both of these protocols.

    1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
    0
    • wendythedruid@thistleandmoss.orgundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      wendythedruid@thistleandmoss.orgundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      wendythedruid@thistleandmoss.org
      scritto su ultima modifica di
      #2
      While I like the protocol for what it is, and how it was written, it is indeed NOT actually decentralized in the classical sense. And it is also algorithmic, even if they say its not.
      res260@infosec.exchangeundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
      0
      • wendythedruid@thistleandmoss.orgundefined wendythedruid@thistleandmoss.org
        While I like the protocol for what it is, and how it was written, it is indeed NOT actually decentralized in the classical sense. And it is also algorithmic, even if they say its not.
        res260@infosec.exchangeundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        res260@infosec.exchangeundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        res260@infosec.exchange
        scritto su ultima modifica di
        #3

        @wendythedruid I really like the PDS part of the protocol and the way identity is handled. The fact that you decide where your data is regardless of the app you choose to use is neat

        1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
        0

        Ciao! Sembra che tu sia interessato a questa conversazione, ma non hai ancora un account.

        Stanco di dover scorrere gli stessi post a ogni visita? Quando registri un account, tornerai sempre esattamente dove eri rimasto e potrai scegliere di essere avvisato delle nuove risposte (tramite email o notifica push). Potrai anche salvare segnalibri e votare i post per mostrare il tuo apprezzamento agli altri membri della comunità.

        Con il tuo contributo, questo post potrebbe essere ancora migliore 💗

        Registrati Accedi
        Rispondi
        • Risposta alla discussione
        Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
        • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
        • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
        • Più Voti


        Feed RSS
        A few facts and thoughts about #BlueSky being decentralized or not:
        @pierobosio@soc.bosio.info
        V4.10.1 Contributors
        • Accedi

        • Accedi o registrati per effettuare la ricerca.
        • Primo post
          Ultimo post