We've all been there. You start a quick TypeScript CLI with process.argv.slice(2), add a couple of options, and before you know it you're drowning in if/else blocks and parseInt calls. It works, until it doesn't.
In this guide, we'll move from manual argument parsing to a fully type-safe CLI with subcommands, mutually exclusive options, and shell completion.
The naïve approach: parsing process.argv
Let's start with the most basic approach. Say we want a greeting program that takes a name and optionally repeats the greeting:
// greet.ts
const args = process.argv.slice(2);
let name: string | undefined;
let count = 1;
for (let i = 0; i < args.length; i++) {
if (args[i] === "--name" || args[i] === "-n") {
name = args[++i];
} else if (args[i] === "--count" || args[i] === "-c") {
count = parseInt(args[++i], 10);
}
}
if (!name) {
console.error("Error: --name is required");
process.exit(1);
}
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) {
console.log(`Hello, ${name}!`);
}
Run node greet.js --name Alice --count 3 and you'll get three greetings.
But this approach is fragile. count could be NaN if someone passes --count foo, and we'd silently proceed. There's no help text. If someone passes --name without a value, we'd read the next option as the name. And the boilerplate grows fast with each new option.
The traditional libraries
You've probably heard of Commander.js and Yargs. They've been around for years and solve the basic problems:
// With Commander.js
import { program } from "commander";
program
.requiredOption("-n, --name <n>", "Name to greet")
.option("-c, --count <number>", "Number of times to greet", "1")
.parse();
const opts = program.opts();
These libraries handle help text, option parsing, and basic validation. But they were designed before TypeScript became mainstream, and the type safety is bolted on rather than built in.
The real problem shows up when you need mutually exclusive options. Say your CLI works either in "server mode" (with --port and --host) or "client mode" (with --url). With these libraries, you end up with a config object where all options are potentially present, and you're left writing runtime checks to ensure the user didn't mix incompatible flags. TypeScript can't help you because the types don't reflect the actual constraints.
Enter Optique
Optique takes a different approach. Instead of configuring options declaratively, you build parsers by composing smaller parsers together. The types flow naturally from this composition, so TypeScript always knows exactly what shape your parsed result will have.
Optique works across JavaScript runtimes: Node.js, Deno, and Bun are all supported. The core parsing logic has no runtime-specific dependencies, so you can even use it in browsers if you need to parse CLI-like arguments in a web context.
Let's rebuild our greeting program:
import { object } from "@optique/core/constructs";
import { option } from "@optique/core/primitives";
import { integer, string } from "@optique/core/valueparser";
import { withDefault } from "@optique/core/modifiers";
import { run } from "@optique/run";
const parser = object({
name: option("-n", "--name", string()),
count: withDefault(option("-c", "--count", integer({ min: 1 })), 1),
});
const config = run(parser);
// config is typed as { name: string; count: number }
for (let i = 0; i < config.count; i++) {
console.log(`Hello, ${config.name}!`);
}
Types are inferred automatically. config.name is string, not string | undefined. config.count is number, guaranteed to be at least 1. Validation is built in: integer({ min: 1 }) rejects non-integers and values below 1 with clear error messages. Help text is generated automatically, and the run() function handles errors and exits with appropriate codes.
Install it with your package manager of choice:
npm add @optique/core @optique/run
# or: pnpm add, yarn add, bun add, deno add jsr:@optique/core jsr:@optique/run
Building up: a file converter
Let's build something more realistic: a file converter that reads from an input file, converts to a specified format, and writes to an output file.
import { object } from "@optique/core/constructs";
import { optional, withDefault } from "@optique/core/modifiers";
import { argument, option } from "@optique/core/primitives";
import { choice, string } from "@optique/core/valueparser";
import { run } from "@optique/run";
const parser = object({
input: argument(string({ metavar: "INPUT" })),
output: option("-o", "--output", string({ metavar: "FILE" })),
format: withDefault(
option("-f", "--format", choice(["json", "yaml", "toml"])),
"json"
),
pretty: option("-p", "--pretty"),
verbose: option("-v", "--verbose"),
});
const config = run(parser, {
help: "both",
version: { mode: "both", value: "1.0.0" },
});
// config.input: string
// config.output: string
// config.format: "json" | "yaml" | "toml"
// config.pretty: boolean
// config.verbose: boolean
The type of config.format isn't just string. It's the union "json" | "yaml" | "toml". TypeScript will catch typos like config.format === "josn" at compile time.
The choice() parser is useful for any option with a fixed set of valid values: log levels, output formats, environment names, and so on. You get both runtime validation (invalid values are rejected with helpful error messages) and compile-time checking (TypeScript knows the exact set of possible values).
Mutually exclusive options
Now let's tackle the case that trips up most CLI libraries: mutually exclusive options. Say our tool can either run as a server or connect as a client, but not both:
import { object, or } from "@optique/core/constructs";
import { withDefault } from "@optique/core/modifiers";
import { argument, constant, option } from "@optique/core/primitives";
import { integer, string, url } from "@optique/core/valueparser";
import { run } from "@optique/run";
const parser = or(
// Server mode
object({
mode: constant("server"),
port: option("-p", "--port", integer({ min: 1, max: 65535 })),
host: withDefault(option("-h", "--host", string()), "0.0.0.0"),
}),
// Client mode
object({
mode: constant("client"),
url: argument(url()),
}),
);
const config = run(parser);
The or() combinator tries each alternative in order. The first one that successfully parses wins. The constant() parser adds a literal value to the result without consuming any input, which serves as a discriminator.
TypeScript infers a discriminated union:
type Config =
| { mode: "server"; port: number; host: string }
| { mode: "client"; url: URL };
Now you can write type-safe code that handles each mode:
if (config.mode === "server") {
console.log(`Starting server on ${config.host}:${config.port}`);
} else {
console.log(`Connecting to ${config.url.hostname}`);
}
Try accessing config.url in the server branch. TypeScript won't let you. The compiler knows that when mode is "server", only port and host exist.
This is the key difference from configuration-based libraries. With Commander or Yargs, you'd get a type like { port?: number; host?: string; url?: string } and have to check at runtime which combination of fields is actually present. With Optique, the types match the actual constraints of your CLI.
Subcommands
For larger tools, you'll want subcommands. Optique handles this with the command() parser:
import { object, or } from "@optique/core/constructs";
import { optional } from "@optique/core/modifiers";
import { argument, command, constant, option } from "@optique/core/primitives";
import { string } from "@optique/core/valueparser";
import { run } from "@optique/run";
const parser = or(
command("add", object({
action: constant("add"),
key: argument(string({ metavar: "KEY" })),
value: argument(string({ metavar: "VALUE" })),
})),
command("remove", object({
action: constant("remove"),
key: argument(string({ metavar: "KEY" })),
})),
command("list", object({
action: constant("list"),
pattern: optional(option("-p", "--pattern", string())),
})),
);
const result = run(parser, { help: "both" });
switch (result.action) {
case "add":
console.log(`Adding ${result.key}=${result.value}`);
break;
case "remove":
console.log(`Removing ${result.key}`);
break;
case "list":
console.log(`Listing${result.pattern ? ` (filter: ${result.pattern})` : ""}`);
break;
}
Each subcommand gets its own help text. Run myapp add --help and you'll see only the options relevant to add. Run myapp --help and you'll see a summary of all available commands.
The pattern here is the same as mutually exclusive options: or() to combine alternatives, constant() to add a discriminator. This consistency is one of Optique's strengths. Once you understand the basic combinators, you can build arbitrarily complex CLI structures by composing them.
Shell completion
Optique has built-in shell completion for Bash, zsh, fish, PowerShell, and Nushell. Enable it by passing completion: "both" to run():
const config = run(parser, {
help: "both",
version: { mode: "both", value: "1.0.0" },
completion: "both",
});
Users can then generate completion scripts:
$ myapp --completion bash >> ~/.bashrc
$ myapp --completion zsh >> ~/.zshrc
$ myapp --completion fish > ~/.config/fish/completions/myapp.fish
The completions are context-aware. They know about your subcommands, option values, and choice() alternatives. Type myapp --format <TAB> and you'll see json, yaml, toml as suggestions. Type myapp a<TAB> and it'll complete to myapp add.
Completion support is often an afterthought in CLI tools, but it makes a real difference in user experience. With Optique, you get it essentially for free.
Integrating with validation libraries
Already using Zod for validation in your project? The @optique/zod package lets you reuse those schemas as CLI value parsers:
import { z } from "zod";
import { zod } from "@optique/zod";
import { option } from "@optique/core/primitives";
const email = option("--email", zod(z.string().email()));
const port = option("--port", zod(z.coerce.number().int().min(1).max(65535)));
Your existing validation logic just works. The Zod error messages are passed through to the user, so you get the same helpful feedback you're used to.
Prefer Valibot? The @optique/valibot package works the same way:
import * as v from "valibot";
import { valibot } from "@optique/valibot";
import { option } from "@optique/core/primitives";
const email = option("--email", valibot(v.pipe(v.string(), v.email())));
Valibot's bundle size is significantly smaller than Zod's (~10KB vs ~52KB), which can matter for CLI tools where startup time is noticeable.
Tips
A few things I've learned building CLIs with Optique:
Start simple. Begin with object() and basic options. Add or() for mutually exclusive groups only when you need them. It's easy to over-engineer CLI parsers.
Use descriptive metavars. Instead of string(), write string({ metavar: "FILE" }) or string({ metavar: "URL" }). The metavar appears in help text and error messages, so it's worth the extra few characters.
Leverage withDefault(). It's better than making options optional and checking for undefined everywhere. Your code becomes cleaner when you can assume values are always present.
Test your parser. Optique's core parsing functions work without process.argv, so you can unit test your parser logic:
import { parse } from "@optique/core/parser";
const result = parse(parser, ["--name", "Alice", "--count", "3"]);
if (result.success) {
assert.equal(result.value.name, "Alice");
assert.equal(result.value.count, 3);
}
This is especially valuable for complex parsers with many edge cases.
Going further
We've covered the fundamentals, but Optique has more to offer:
Async value parsers for validating against external sources, like checking if a Git branch exists or if a URL is reachable
Path validation with path() for checking file existence, directory structure, and file extensions
Custom value parsers for domain-specific types (though Zod/Valibot integration is usually easier)
Reusable option groups with merge() for sharing common options across subcommands
The @optique/temporal package for parsing dates and times using the Temporal API
Check out the documentation for the full picture. The tutorial walks through the concepts in more depth, and the cookbook has patterns for common scenarios.
That's it
Building CLIs in TypeScript doesn't have to mean fighting with types or writing endless runtime validation. Optique lets you express constraints in a way that TypeScript actually understands, so the compiler catches mistakes before they reach production.
The source is on GitHub, and packages are available on both npm and JSR.
Questions or feedback? Find me on the fediverse or open an issue on the GitHub repo.
undefined stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe shared this topic on
