Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

We're happy to announce a long-term partnership with Motorola.

Uncategorized
84 56 1

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
Post suggeriti
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    0 Views
    Concorso 2026 di #ProgrammailFuturo per le scuole!Quale è il tema 2026? stimolare la riflessione degli studenti sull'Informatica come strumento di collaborazione e cooperazione.Come?Le singole classi potranno partecipare seguendo le indicazioni che trovi a partire da questa pagina:https://programmailfuturo.it/progetto/concorso-2026Scadenza?Sarà possibile inviare gli elaborati fino al 30 APRILE 2026. I risultati del Concorso saranno annunciati nel corso dell'evento celebrativo del dodicesimo anno del progetto.
  • MaddAI

    Uncategorized
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1 Views
    RE: https://mastodon.social/@macrumors/116160662852489166MaddAI
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    0 Views
    Morto oggi un altro operaio nell'ILVA https://lists.peacelink.it/taranto/2026/03/msg00000.html#ILVA #Taranto
  • 0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1 Views
    @mro@digitalcourage.social Valid points. The “Large” in LLM indeed mirrors the “Big” in Big IT—that is precisely the materialist contradiction I'm highlighting. Currently, the scale required for these models forces a centralized, corporate structure. Regarding productivity: as a developer, I view LLM not just as a “code generator” (where the ±20% debate happens), but as a new layer of interface for complex information. Whether it's asbestos or X-ray, the reality is that the “means” are already being deployed at a massive scale, shaping our digital society. You mentioned focusing on the ends. I agree. But in our current system, the “ends” are dictated by those who own the “means.” If the means (LLMs) remain a corporate monopoly, the “ends” will always be profit and surveillance. My argument for socialization isn't about “more software” for the sake of it; it's about reclaiming the power to define the “ends.” We can't democratically decide how to use (or even limit) a technology if we don't own the infrastructure it runs on. Even if we decide to use it “narrowly and carefully” like X-rays, that decision should belong to the public, not a boardroom.