Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

Do you know what I really want?

Uncategorized
1 1 3

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
Post suggeriti
  • Planning your week?

    Uncategorized booktalk enshittification
    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1 Views
    Planning your week? Cory Doctorow’s #booktalk on ENSHITTIFICATION is your chance to learn who broke the internet & how we can fix it.The concept became the 2023 Word of the Year & was cited as inspiration for the 2025 season of Black Mirror. Co-hosted with @AuthorsAlliance.📆 Friday, Nov 21st 🕙 10 AM PT / 1 PM ET📍 Online🎟️ https://blog.archive.org/event/book-talk-with-cory-doctorow/#enshittification
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    Tucking into this one because @pluralistic@mamot.fr told me I had to. I don't know how nuts it's going to be, but the first couple chapters start out with some truly wild stories. Promoting because the author is not allowed to. #bookstodon #greed #facebook #enshittification(comment on Careless People)
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    7 Views
    Today in grading undergraduate writing assignments;"the journal name is real, the title is the real name of an article, the DOI is real, the authors are real… but nothing matches. For example, the DOI is not from the same article as the journal name, or title, or authors. Same with all other elements of the citation.I think this is likely a Claude hallucination (rather than Chat GPT); Claude is known for doing a better job at pulling real citations or pulling real information to create a fake citation. "So we assigned students a straightforward writing assignment; pick one of five proposed policy changes and write 500 words in support or in opposition to it. Two or three citations were required. No ChatGPT without sharing your original 500 words, your AI prompt , the resulting AI output and your final revision. 90% awesome, reasonable arguments for and against and then 10% that were essentially perfect. We went into the citations via PubMed and other sources and found the above. So, obviously 10 points for that section and we indicated that we'd carefully evaluate all future work from the students with hallucinations, any further indication of AI use outside the syllabus will be zero on the assignment and a referral to student affairs for cheating.So does anyone have any idea why these citations are f-ed up in this reproducibly awful way? Like, what is Claude doing wrong, exactly? It's like Claude is ALMOST identifying relevant work but it can't quite produce actual citations, just things that look like citations. It's like they missed the step where you actually have to READ THE DAMN PAPER YOU WANT TO CITE. Which it could do of course, it could ingest the whole paper, summarize it, simply pattern match versus the students writing and insert a valid doi link. Why is it making this specific error? Anyone?#Enshittification #Science #AI #Citations #Hallucination
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    6 Views
    🔥 More Anti-enshittification features now live in Bonfire✨ Complete data portability: Export/import now supports circles/lists, bookmarks, likes, and boosts alongside follows, blocks, and posts. ✨ Transparency by design: A dedicated real-time dashboard to monitor migration progress in detail and troubleshoot issues.Read more about 1.0 RC3: https://bonfirenetworks.org/posts/bonfire-social-1-0rc3/#enshittification #release