Static Web Hosting on the Intel N150: FreeBSD, SmartOS, NetBSD, OpenBSD and Linux Compared
-
@stefano great writeup as always. those n150 machines are a great alternative to pi/arm. have two in the lab running freebsd for dns and other adventures. such a capable little machine.
@jae Thanks. I'm using one of them as workstation at office. It's perfect: no noise, low power consumption, good performance
-
@jae Thanks. I'm using one of them as workstation at office. It's perfect: no noise, low power consumption, good performance
@stefano good usecase for general purpose. for what i do i need more ram for my works. i did setup mastodon+caddy in jails on one and it didn't really tax it at all.
you may see it in your client work, but i all too often see clients pouring cash on the fastest/latest to future proof. most of the time their existing systems barely hit 30% capacity. they want headroom so i show them optics over time and shift their money to more meaningful initiatives. ive found it helps with credibility and to maintain the relationship. people remember good solutions and cost stewardship
-
Static Web Hosting on the Intel N150: FreeBSD, SmartOS, NetBSD, OpenBSD and Linux Compared
Update: This post has been updated to include Docker benchmarks and a comparison of container overhead versus FreeBSD Jails and illumos Zones.
#ITNotes #freebsd #illumos #jail #linux #netbsd #openbsd #ownyourdata #server #smartos #sysadmin #zoneshosting
@stefano This was a really interesting read.
-
@stefano This was a really interesting read.
@afb thank you!
-
Static Web Hosting on the Intel N150: FreeBSD, SmartOS, NetBSD, OpenBSD and Linux Compared
Update: This post has been updated to include Docker benchmarks and a comparison of container overhead versus FreeBSD Jails and illumos Zones.
#ITNotes #freebsd #illumos #jail #linux #netbsd #openbsd #ownyourdata #server #smartos #sysadmin #zoneshosting
@stefano great write up. Hit all major points fairly. It's good to see FreeBSD and Debian still kicking ass.
-
Static Web Hosting on the Intel N150: FreeBSD, SmartOS, NetBSD, OpenBSD and Linux Compared
Update: This post has been updated to include Docker benchmarks and a comparison of container overhead versus FreeBSD Jails and illumos Zones.
#ITNotes #freebsd #illumos #jail #linux #netbsd #openbsd #ownyourdata #server #smartos #sysadmin #zoneshosting
@stefano
Interesting writing as usual, and interesting result!
Maybe supporting aesni or not, or how offloading to NIC matters here on TLS tests? -
@stefano great write up. Hit all major points fairly. It's good to see FreeBSD and Debian still kicking ass.
@cienmilojos thank you!
-
@stefano
Interesting writing as usual, and interesting result!
Maybe supporting aesni or not, or how offloading to NIC matters here on TLS tests?@TomAoki Yes, probably. I haven't investigated deeply, but seeing the http result, I think it's related to the aes-ni.
-
Static Web Hosting on the Intel N150: FreeBSD, SmartOS, NetBSD, OpenBSD and Linux Compared
Update: This post has been updated to include Docker benchmarks and a comparison of container overhead versus FreeBSD Jails and illumos Zones.
#ITNotes #freebsd #illumos #jail #linux #netbsd #openbsd #ownyourdata #server #smartos #sysadmin #zoneshosting
@stefano Are there any sysctl knobs/dials you'd recommend for optimising a web stack on FreeBSD?
-
@stefano Are there any sysctl knobs/dials you'd recommend for optimising a web stack on FreeBSD?
@pertho it mostly depends on the workload. kTLS can really boost your performance, but there've been some problems with it, in the past (I think it's ok now). And tuning other stuff requires to fully understand the typical workload (Many small files? Big files, many connections? etc.)
So I can't recommend a "one size fits all" for a web stack. The default values are already reasonable for normal workloads as FreeBSD is already extremely efficient. -
@pertho it mostly depends on the workload. kTLS can really boost your performance, but there've been some problems with it, in the past (I think it's ok now). And tuning other stuff requires to fully understand the typical workload (Many small files? Big files, many connections? etc.)
So I can't recommend a "one size fits all" for a web stack. The default values are already reasonable for normal workloads as FreeBSD is already extremely efficient.@stefano but... We need... Moaaar. ..... Powerrrr! 😂
-
@stefano but... We need... Moaaar. ..... Powerrrr! 😂