Static Web Hosting on the Intel N150: FreeBSD, SmartOS, NetBSD, OpenBSD and Linux Compared

[stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

Static Web Hosting on the Intel N150: FreeBSD, SmartOS, NetBSD, OpenBSD and Linux Compared

Update: This post has been updated to include Docker benchmarks and a comparison of container overhead versus FreeBSD Jails and illumos Zones.

https://it-notes.dragas.net/2025/11/19/static-web-hosting-intel-n150-freebsd-smartos-netbsd-openbsd-linux/

#ITNotes #freebsd #illumos #jail #linux #netbsd #openbsd #ownyourdata #server #smartos #sysadmin #zoneshosting

[madduci@mastodon.social]

@stefano interesting read, question: why Debian 12 and not 13?

[stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

This post is deleted!

[dorubab@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

@stefano sadly the cryptographic functions from the illumos kernel might be a bit underperforming.

See https://www.illumos.org/issues/4896.

Unsure if they do impact TLS, but they do impact zfs native encryption performance for sure.

One of those things that are totally okay for self hosting in many cases, but that might be quite a pain for a production environment

[kinderstampfer@mstdn.social]

@stefano The performance of FreeBSD is quite interesting here.

Might this be due to all the optimization work for throughput and resource utilization that happened in the recent years? (at least partly driven by $large_streaming_provider as far as i'm aware)

[stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

This post is deleted!

[kinderstampfer@mstdn.social]

@stefano Very true that good engineering pays off :-)

And now that you say it, i kinda remember FreeBSD being the thing that was recommended back then if you wanted all the performance possible.

[jae@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

@stefano great writeup as always. those n150 machines are a great alternative to pi/arm. have two in the lab running freebsd for dns and other adventures. such a capable little machine.

[stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

This post is deleted!

[stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

This post is deleted!

[jae@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

@stefano good usecase for general purpose. for what i do i need more ram for my works. i did setup mastodon+caddy in jails on one and it didn't really tax it at all.

you may see it in your client work, but i all too often see clients pouring cash on the fastest/latest to future proof. most of the time their existing systems barely hit 30% capacity. they want headroom so i show them optics over time and shift their money to more meaningful initiatives. ive found it helps with credibility and to maintain the relationship. people remember good solutions and cost stewardship

[afb@mastodonapp.uk]

@stefano This was a really interesting read.

[stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

This post is deleted!

[cienmilojos@infosec.exchange]

@stefano great write up. Hit all major points fairly. It's good to see FreeBSD and Debian still kicking ass.

[tomaoki@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

@stefano
Interesting writing as usual, and interesting result!
Maybe supporting aesni or not, or how offloading to NIC matters here on TLS tests?

[stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

This post is deleted!

[stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

This post is deleted!

[pertho@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

This post is deleted!

[stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

This post is deleted!

[pertho@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

This post is deleted!