Jimmy Wales getting rustled in this interview:
Uncategorized
1
Posts
1
Posters
1
Views
-
Jimmy Wales getting rustled in this interview:
T.J.: Alright. New episode of Jung&Naiv. I have a new guest. Who are you? J.W.: I'm Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia. T.J.: You're the founder or co-founder? [Because...] J.W. [interrupts]: I don't care. That's the dumbest question in the world. T.J.: Really? J.W.: Absolutely. T.J.: There seems to be a dispute. J.W.: There is no dispute! I don't care. So, yeah... Say what you like, it doesn't matter. T.J: Well, isn't that - like- when it comes to Wikipedia a problem? You know; What are the facts? J.W.: Yeah. [Laughs] Well, it's not a fact, it's an opinion. You can have whatever opinion you like. It doesn't matter. T.J.: But for you, you are the founder? J.W. [leans forward]: Can I just say again: It doesn't matter! I have answered your question four times. [Stands up] You know what? I'm done. [Leaves] T.J.: What's going on? J.W.[off camera, leaving]:It's stupid. Don't ask me stupid question! T.J.: How is this stupid? J.W.[off camera, far away]: It's a stupid question! T.J. [speaking off camera]: It was the first question?! T.J. [speaking towards audience]: Alright. We are done here. The shortest interview of Jung&Naiv. Bye. -
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic on
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@simonett_a seee. Che se poi mi piacciono sono fottuto :ciccione:
-
I think the claim is true.
The final price paid by most of us is an average of all energy prices and it raises up as an effect of oil price raise.
However, the price of solar and wind energy don't increase.
-
Here's Laundry Bear (allegedly) using headless Edge instances to execute malware
-
@fucinafibonacci @economia che schifo i tanti che conosco etici e 'compagni' che continuano ad usufruire di servizi schiavizzanti del genere...
-
Relays Run This Balanced Ternary Adder
If you’re at all familiar with digital computing, you’ll know that computers represent everything in binary values of one and zero. Except that’s not technically the only way to do computing! You can use any numerical system you like if you build your hardware to suit, as [Jeroen Brinkman’s] ternary adder demonstrates.
As you might guess from the prefix, “ternary” refers to a base-3 numerical system. In this case, [Jeroen] implemented a balanced ternary system, which effectively uses values of -, 0, and + instead of just 1 and 0. The adder is built using relay logic, and is designed to handle 4 trits—the ternary equivalent of bits, where each trit can have one of the three aforementioned states. On a hardware level, trit states are represented with voltages of -5, 0, or 5 V in this case, and are handled with special tri-state switching elements that [Jeroen] constructed out of simple SPDT relays.
[Jeroen]’s write-up does a great job of explaining both ternary basics as well as the functioning of the adder. It’s also quite intuitive because it’s possible to see the relays clicking away and the LEDs flashing on and off as the circuit does its work to add values stored in ternary format.
If you’re trying to get your head around ternary computing from the very lowest level, this project is a great place to start. We’ve seen base 3 hardware built before, too—like this simple ternary computer lashed together from accessible components.
If you’re cooking up your own computing apparatus that uses some weird number system or something, remember—we’d love to hear about it on the tipsline!
-
@kaveman Absolutely!!!
-
"meglio arrivare tardi in questo mondo che presto nell'altro"
-
@gmarcosanti dai provaci anche tu Gabriele! 🙋🏻♀️
