Is ActivityPub a blatant violation of GDPR?
General Discussion
1
Posts
1
Posters
0
Views
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
Is ActivityPub a blatant violation of GDPR?
-
They might want to publish something that's clearer then, because it certainly sounded like they wanted to abandon ActivityPub. "MisskeyHQ (misskey.io) != Misskey" isn't particularly helpful.. lots of brand name confusion there.
-
nate.mecca1.net/posts/2025-12-…
New blog post, a bit of an addendum to my older microblogging protocols comparison post(s) until I do an updated version at some point. It mostly just goes over a handful of big events and shifts I've personally noticed since my last post in the summer of 2024.
-
Posting for historical purposes:
#Misskey is NOT getting rid of #ActivityPub support
-
@mayel @evana @scottjenson @mastodonmigration @stefan It would only make it a little more difficult. The 'brigading' is now a two-step process for every participant.
The vector is really the 'followers-only' option. If we want to keep it, no way around sending a mandatory copy to a designated 'brigading moderator'.
-
@erlend Appreciate it! Could you expand on how you envision a group following another group working?
-
@bonfire backing!
Very happy to hear compatibility with the threadiverse is a goal. On that note, I hope you’ll consider pioneering the ability for groups to follow other groups:
-
I've improved federation support for Lemmy and other servers that support FEP-1b12 Group Federation.
I had to increase the number of available file descriptors on my personal server 4x because of the resultant inbound volume of ActivityPub activities! I liked a federated post and DOSed my server.
