Tutti che amano i cani ma nessuno che vuole prenderli.
Uncategorized
3
Posts
2
Posters
0
Views
-
Tutti che amano i cani ma nessuno che vuole prenderli.
-
Tutti che amano i cani ma nessuno che vuole prenderli.
@gmarcosanti i vicentini amano i gatti
-
@gmarcosanti i vicentini amano i gatti
@DigiDavidex ne ho tre anche di quelli da dare via.
Stessa storia.
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
If Mozilla is really purpose-driven, I think the number one goal of the organization should be getting out of the monopoly headlock it's in right now. It should find another buyer for its search engine placement service, and it should diversify its revenue to get the business on a firm footing that doesn't keep governments from enforcing competitive markets.
-
I personally think that participating in an anti-competitive business practice that a court has found hurts American (and assumably also global) consumers and other businesses is not compatible with that purpose. I don't think that humans flourish in systems dominated by monopolies that use their power to extend those monopolies. Neither have most economists since about 1875.
-
@filosophy.bsky.social (@filosophy.bsky.social)
https://bsky.app/profile/filosophy.bsky.social/post/3mah2k2ihys2t
-
> it's only 16GB. Your laptop will be fine
Only if it was assembled within the first quarter of 2025 though 8-D
-
Here's the main point, though: Mozilla is supposed to be somewhat purpose-driven. Its goals and mission are somewhat laid out in the Mozilla Manifesto. In particular, it supports and open and accessible Internet.
-
Weirdly, the fact that Mozilla would be unable to find another buyer for its product (search engine placement), and the threat of another monopoly in browsers and browser engines, did not make Judge Mehta take *extra* remedies, like making Google sell Chrome and/or Android. Instead, the judge gave some pretty mild remedies, which probably won't do anything to make Google's 88% of the search engine market less of a problem for consumers or others in the ecosystem.
-
Mozilla Corporation has subsisted almost entirely on this kind of deal with Google since the company was founded. When the judge in US vs. Google was considering remedies (like forbidding that kind of deal), Mozilla argued that this remedy would make it unable to compete in the *other* area that Google has a near monopoly, namely browsers:
https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/internet-policy/google-remedies-browsers/
