It seems like #ActivityPub was always supporting username changes when implemented correct.
General Discussion
3
Posts
2
Posters
0
Views
-
It seems like #ActivityPub was always supporting username changes when implemented correct. @snarfed.org@bsky.brid.gy's Bridgy Fed perfectly renamed my account as I changed domains on @bsky.app@bsky.brid.gy.
Fediverse Data is not Deleted ... -
It seems like #ActivityPub was always supporting username changes when implemented correct. @snarfed.org@bsky.brid.gy's Bridgy Fed perfectly renamed my account as I changed domains on @bsky.app@bsky.brid.gy.
Fediverse Data is not Deleted ...@cmislek.me well, yes and no.
When people talk about username changes in the context of AT-Proto, they mean it that the two users on each side of the rename can be clearly identified as the same entity (through the magic of cryptographic keys).
In ActivityPub even if you can create a new account, there's no way to link it unambiguously to the previous one because in the protocol the URL of the user itself is the identifying element, not a separate piece of information like a public key.
-
@cmislek.me well, yes and no.
When people talk about username changes in the context of AT-Proto, they mean it that the two users on each side of the rename can be clearly identified as the same entity (through the magic of cryptographic keys).
In ActivityPub even if you can create a new account, there's no way to link it unambiguously to the previous one because in the protocol the URL of the user itself is the identifying element, not a separate piece of information like a public key.
Damn, I got bridged. :D
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
Release v3.2.3 of Ktistec includes two big features:
FEP-1b12 Group federation
Improved federation with Lemmy and other forum-type servers. Ktistec supports community and thread follow/unfollow, as well as up-vote/like (down-vote/dislike is supported but there is no visual affordance for that yet).FEP-9098 Custom emojis
Support for viewing custom emoji in posts and on actor profiles. Ktistec does not yet support custom emoji creation and management.The full changelog:
Added
Support for viewing custom emoji in posts and on actor profiles.Actor type (Person, Group, etc.) overlay badges on actor panels.Colored fallback avatars for actors without icons.Support for robots.txt.Fixed
Federation with Lemmy and other servers that support FEP-1b12.Shared inbox support for local actors.Serialization of Undo includes the undone activity.Serialization of Like and Dislike does not.Notify only once for an object's first received activity.Changed
Accumulate metrics by hour for finer granularity.Clean up presentation of public followers/following pages.The next release will include support for Mastodon polls (FEP-9967).
-
Damn, I got bridged. :D
-
@cmislek.me well, yes and no.
When people talk about username changes in the context of AT-Proto, they mean it that the two users on each side of the rename can be clearly identified as the same entity (through the magic of cryptographic keys).
In ActivityPub even if you can create a new account, there's no way to link it unambiguously to the previous one because in the protocol the URL of the user itself is the identifying element, not a separate piece of information like a public key.
-
It seems like #ActivityPub was always supporting username changes when implemented correct. @snarfed.org@bsky.brid.gy's Bridgy Fed perfectly renamed my account as I changed domains on @bsky.app@bsky.brid.gy.
Fediverse Data is not Deleted ...
-
Sharing a blog post from a Japanese developer, re: #ActivityPub amase.cc/articles/en/...
Why don't recommend to impleme...
-
jdt@enigmatick.social thanks! Yeah it was important to me to get that right. That little highlight library has been chugging along all this time lol.
-
@julian@activitypub.space BTW, I love that your interface uses rich formatting for markdown code blocks - so many platforms just phone that bit in.
Enigmatick uses highlight.js too, so I tend to use that a lot.
-
@jdt@enigmatick.social Fixed. My code handles the Accept header per RFC specifications now (i.e., by explicit weight first and by order second).
