Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

We wish everyone at #EuroBSDcon a great conference!

Uncategorized
1 1 13

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
Post suggeriti
  • Happy Friday #FreeBSD

    Uncategorized freebsd
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    8 Views
    Happy Friday #FreeBSD
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    6 Views
    Happy Friday to all the #BSD folks! 😎 #freebsd #openbsd #netbsd #bsd
  • Hello, new #FediMeteo friends

    Uncategorized fedimeteo freebsd
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    4 Views
    Hello, new #FediMeteo friends!As the great @FediFollows@social.growyourown.services posted about this service, many of you started following me and the cities. And I'm so glad about it!If you want to know something more about FediMeteo and its story (and how all this is still working on a 4 euro/month VPS powered by #FreeBSD), you can have a look here:FediMeteo: How a Tiny €4 FreeBSD VPS Became a Global Weather Service for Thousands - https://it-notes.dragas.net/2025/02/26/fedimeteo-how-a-tiny-freebsd-vps-became-a-global-weather-service-for-thousands/
  • Hey, #FreeBSD jail/networking folks:

    Uncategorized freebsd
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    16 Views
    Hey, #FreeBSD jail/networking folks:I've been trying to figure out whether VNET jail-networking *requires* a bridge0 device with both the LAN-facing adapter and all the common epair ends, or whether, since the epairs are all virtual interfaces, pf(4) can manage to do the routing/NAT without everything sitting on the same bridge0 device.However, when I try this (including net.{inet.ip,inet6,ip6}.forwarding=1) traffic doesn't seem to flow. Is there some obvious thing I've missed or that I should be testing? Or do I just need to throw everything on a bridge0 and deal with it?